FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2095234900> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2095234900 endingPage "181" @default.
• W2095234900 startingPage "165" @default.
• W2095234900 abstract "Marsilio Ficino’s Critique of the Lucretian Alternative James G. Snyder Introduction Marsilio Ficino is perhaps most widely remembered by historians of philosophy today as a fifteenth-century Platonist and Hermeticist who advocated the soul’s flight from the sordid world of matter and body. Ficino’s major contributions to philosophy include his Latin translations of Plato and Plotinus, as well as his voluminous and encyclopedic Platonic Theology, where he argues that the immortal soul occupies a privileged midpoint between God and inchoate prime matter. It therefore comes as a surprise to learn that Ficino, for a time in his early twenties, was drawn to the Roman poet Lucretius, who believed that most people are plagued by the superstitions of religiously-minded fable mongers. During this time Ficino composed a short commentary on Lucretius’ didactic Epicurean poem, On the Nature of Things. In 1417 one of the last surviving manuscript copies of this poem was found in a German monastery by the humanist Poggio Bracciolini after several centuries of dormancy.1 Also, in an early treatise on pleasure, Ficino [End Page 165] argues that the Epicurean emphasis on pleasure as the removal of pain is superior to the crass and vulgar hedonism of Aristippus.2 In time, however, Ficino developed into the Platonist that historians of philosophy are more familiar with today. He turned his back on Lucretius, destroyed his commentary on him, and he became a rigid opponent of those philosophers who, as Plato describes them in his Sophist, “insist that only what offers tangible contact is, since they define being as the same as body.”3 Despite the fact that Ficino ultimately rejected Lucretius, and in a letter to the poet Angelo Poliziano claimed to have “followed the divine Plato from my youth,” it appears that he was never able to successfully put the Epicurean poet completely out of his mind.4 The specter of Lucretius—that is, the specter of a potent and fully-articulated materialism and what it entails—casts a long shadow across the eighteen books of Ficino’s Platonic Theology. This work, which was printed in 1482 and remains his most extensive philosophical treatise, gives the impression that Ficino considered Lucretius a relevant and un-eliminated alternative to his own mature philosophical vision. The Lucretian alternative, as it will here be called, aspires to show that anything that exists is a composite of matter and void alone, and that there is no need to countenance the existence of some ghostly third constituent, such as soul, in order to explain adequately the phenomena of nature or consciousness.5 Ficino’s Platonic Theology argues for a profoundly different metaphysical picture of the nature of things. There Ficino wanted to demonstrate the essential immortality of the soul, and to further clarify the best way that it can, as he puts it, “cast off the bonds of our terrestrial chains” so that it may “fly unhindered to the ethereal abode.”6 However, in order for Ficino to accomplish this, he first had to show that the Lucretian alternative is not a living hypothesis, but a dead one. Refuting Lucretius, therefore, is central to the polemical aims and aspirations of this [End Page 166] work, and it is to this end that Ficino addresses several chapters to refuting the materialism of the “vulgar” and “impious” Epicurean poet and philosopher. The Lucretian alternative also explains in part why Ficino discusses, sometimes at great length, the nature of matter and body, especially in the early books of his Platonic Theology. The core argument that Ficino brings against the Lucretian alternative is that its materialist ontology is at best incomplete, and that something else—some ghostly incorporeal principle— is in fact necessary in order to adequately explain the nature of things. Both the Renaissance recovery of On the Nature of Things, and the subsequent role that it played in the advancement of early modern philosophy and science, are familiar to historians of philosophy today.7 Ficino’s fifteenth-century critique of Lucretius, however, is not. Nearly half a century ago Paul Oskar Kristeller noted that in the 1450s Ficino came under the influence of Lucretius, and he further speculated that “a trace..." @default.
• W2095234900 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2095234900 creator A5046119540 @default.
• W2095234900 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2095234900 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2095234900 title "Marsilio Ficino’s Critique of the Lucretian Alternative" @default.
• W2095234900 cites W120750485 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W139262112 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W144073089 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W1524070726 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W1528284714 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W1573319433 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W1581458942 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W1591456195 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W1969540150 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W2001778313 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W2035557577 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W2046287831 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W2048503630 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W2100969173 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W2163799319 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W2168857908 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W2170835745 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W2314086758 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W2331505622 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W566236255 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W610352746 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W624588192 @default.
• W2095234900 cites W2512358869 @default.
• W2095234900 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2011.0012" @default.
• W2095234900 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2095234900 type Work @default.
• W2095234900 sameAs 2095234900 @default.
• W2095234900 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2095234900 countsByYear W20952349002016 @default.
• W2095234900 countsByYear W20952349002019 @default.
• W2095234900 countsByYear W20952349002021 @default.
• W2095234900 countsByYear W20952349002022 @default.
• W2095234900 countsByYear W20952349002023 @default.
• W2095234900 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2095234900 hasAuthorship W2095234900A5046119540 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConcept C164913051 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConcept C179455192 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConcept C2779594674 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConcept C2780822299 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConceptScore W2095234900C124952713 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConceptScore W2095234900C138885662 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConceptScore W2095234900C142362112 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConceptScore W2095234900C164913051 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConceptScore W2095234900C179455192 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConceptScore W2095234900C27206212 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConceptScore W2095234900C2779594674 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConceptScore W2095234900C2780822299 @default.
• W2095234900 hasConceptScore W2095234900C74916050 @default.
• W2095234900 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2095234900 hasLocation W20952349001 @default.
• W2095234900 hasOpenAccess W2095234900 @default.
• W2095234900 hasPrimaryLocation W20952349001 @default.
• W2095234900 hasRelatedWork W192165680 @default.
• W2095234900 hasRelatedWork W1978560547 @default.
• W2095234900 hasRelatedWork W2379579258 @default.
• W2095234900 hasRelatedWork W2478829018 @default.
• W2095234900 hasRelatedWork W2490582312 @default.
• W2095234900 hasRelatedWork W2615803486 @default.
• W2095234900 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2095234900 hasRelatedWork W2904907861 @default.
• W2095234900 hasRelatedWork W4200271628 @default.
• W2095234900 hasRelatedWork W4249633992 @default.
• W2095234900 hasVolume "72" @default.
• W2095234900 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2095234900 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2095234900 magId "2095234900" @default.
• W2095234900 workType "article" @default.