FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2095679971> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2095679971 endingPage "548" @default.
• W2095679971 startingPage "536" @default.
• W2095679971 abstract "Purpose. The purpose of this study is to investigate the comparative clinical performance of two hyper Dk contact lenses: a silicone hydrogel lens (Focus Night & Day, Ciba Vision) and a rigid lens (Z-alpha, Menicon Co. Ltd.) when worn for up to 30 days of continuous wear (CW). The rigid lens was worn on an unplanned replacement basis, whereas the soft lens was replaced monthly. Methods. One hundred subjects were recruited. Fifty neophyte subjects were randomly assigned into one of the lens types (25 subjects per lens type). Twenty-five existing daily wear (DW) rigid lens users wore the rigid study lens and 25 existing DW soft lens users wore the soft study lens. Visual acuity, lens fit, keratometry, refraction, lens surface assessment, physiological response, and subjective response were investigated at baseline and after 1 week of DW and 24 hours, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of CW. Analysis compared lens type (rigid vs. soft) and subject group (experienced vs. neophyte). Results. Sixty-eight subjects completed the study. Visual acuity was similar for the two lens types and subject groups. Lens fit was judged to be adequate in all subjects. Corneal curvature of subjects in the rigid groups became flatter by 0.13 mm compared with 0.04 mm for subjects in the soft lens groups (F = 14.7, p = 0.0003); the refractive findings mirrored these corneal changes. The increasing rate of deposition on rigid lenses was consistent with the fact that these lenses were not replaced during the study. Conjunctival hyperemia and staining were similar for the two lens types but greater among experienced wearers at baseline (F = 13.8, p = 0.0005; F = 5.3, p = 0.02, respectively). Corneal staining was higher for the rigid lens wearers (F = 5.6, p = 0.02) but this was mainly the result of the initial higher scores in the rigid lens experienced group. The change in papillary conjunctivitis was greater for subjects in the soft lens groups than rigid lens groups (F = 4.6, p = 0.04). Comfort was initially lower for the rigid lens neophyte group (F = 4.2, p = 0.0001), but after the CW phase started, there were no differences between groups. Conclusions. Notwithstanding subtle differences in physiological responses, continuous wear hyper Dk rigid and soft silicone-containing contact lenses can be successfully worn by both those with previous contact lens experience and those with no history of contact lens wear." @default.
• W2095679971 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2095679971 creator A5020250770 @default.
• W2095679971 creator A5038424719 @default.
• W2095679971 creator A5047457945 @default.
• W2095679971 creator A5051013180 @default.
• W2095679971 date "2005-06-01" @default.
• W2095679971 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2095679971 title "Comparative Clinical Performance of Rigid versus Soft Hyper Dk Contact Lenses Used for Continuous Wear" @default.
• W2095679971 cites W1978657618 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W1980486054 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W1982347671 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W1983077118 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W1998745171 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W1999150121 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2005894021 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2007364460 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2016580064 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2044543792 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2050616395 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2053920035 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2068364217 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2068756546 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2078517186 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2081553478 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2082391401 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2085795038 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2086929200 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2093114245 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2093723987 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2126490288 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2129805090 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2147962278 @default.
• W2095679971 cites W2156538473 @default.
• W2095679971 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200506000-00018" @default.
• W2095679971 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15976592" @default.
• W2095679971 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2095679971 type Work @default.
• W2095679971 sameAs 2095679971 @default.
• W2095679971 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2095679971 countsByYear W20956799712012 @default.
• W2095679971 countsByYear W20956799712013 @default.
• W2095679971 countsByYear W20956799712014 @default.
• W2095679971 countsByYear W20956799712015 @default.
• W2095679971 countsByYear W20956799712017 @default.
• W2095679971 countsByYear W20956799712018 @default.
• W2095679971 countsByYear W20956799712019 @default.
• W2095679971 countsByYear W20956799712021 @default.
• W2095679971 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2095679971 hasAuthorship W2095679971A5020250770 @default.
• W2095679971 hasAuthorship W2095679971A5038424719 @default.
• W2095679971 hasAuthorship W2095679971A5047457945 @default.
• W2095679971 hasAuthorship W2095679971A5051013180 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConcept C15336307 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConcept C204442743 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConcept C205318122 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConcept C2781093698 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConcept C2781135284 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConcept C2986805488 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConceptScore W2095679971C118487528 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConceptScore W2095679971C119767625 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConceptScore W2095679971C120665830 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConceptScore W2095679971C121332964 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConceptScore W2095679971C15336307 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConceptScore W2095679971C204442743 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConceptScore W2095679971C205318122 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConceptScore W2095679971C2778257484 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConceptScore W2095679971C2781093698 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConceptScore W2095679971C2781135284 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConceptScore W2095679971C2986805488 @default.
• W2095679971 hasConceptScore W2095679971C71924100 @default.
• W2095679971 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2095679971 hasLocation W20956799711 @default.
• W2095679971 hasLocation W20956799712 @default.
• W2095679971 hasOpenAccess W2095679971 @default.
• W2095679971 hasPrimaryLocation W20956799711 @default.
• W2095679971 hasRelatedWork W2028139417 @default.
• W2095679971 hasRelatedWork W2058727211 @default.
• W2095679971 hasRelatedWork W2794401950 @default.
• W2095679971 hasRelatedWork W2885040358 @default.
• W2095679971 hasRelatedWork W2885988048 @default.
• W2095679971 hasRelatedWork W3084274891 @default.
• W2095679971 hasRelatedWork W3088610489 @default.
• W2095679971 hasRelatedWork W3164148278 @default.
• W2095679971 hasRelatedWork W3202264272 @default.
• W2095679971 hasRelatedWork W47383000 @default.
• W2095679971 hasVolume "82" @default.
• W2095679971 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2095679971 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2095679971 magId "2095679971" @default.
• W2095679971 workType "article" @default.