Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2095865619> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2095865619 endingPage "1339" @default.
- W2095865619 startingPage "1330" @default.
- W2095865619 abstract "Adult anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniques may be inappropriate to treat skeletally immature patients because of the risk of physeal complications. Physeal-sparing reconstruction techniques exist, but their ability to restore knee stability and contact mechanics is not well understood.(1) To assess the ability of the all-epiphyseal (AE) and over-the-top (OT) reconstruction techniques to restore knee kinematics, (2) to assess whether these reconstruction techniques decrease the high posterior contact stresses seen with ACL deficiency, and (3) to determine whether the AE or OT technique produces abnormal tibiofemoral contact stresses.Controlled laboratory study.Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a robotic manipulator. Tibiofemoral motions were recorded with the ACL intact, after sectioning the ACL, and after both reconstructions in each of the 10 specimens. The AE technique consisted of tunnels exclusively within the epiphysis and was fixed with suspensory cortical fixation devices. The OT procedure consisted of a central and vertical tibial tunnel with an over-the-top femoral position and was fixed with staples and posts on both ends. Anterior stability was assessed with 134-N anterior force at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. Rotational stability was assessed with combined 8 N·m and 4 N·m of abduction and internal rotation, respectively, at 5°, 15°, and 30° of knee flexion.Both reconstruction techniques off-loaded the posterior aspect of the tibial plateau compared with the ACL-deficient knee in response to both anterior loads and combined moments as demonstrated by reduced contact stresses in this region at all flexion angles. Compared with the ACL-intact condition, both the AE and OT procedures had increased posteromedial contact stresses in response to anterior load at some flexion angles, and the OT technique had increased peripheral posterolateral contact stresses at 15° in response to combined moments. Neither reconstruction technique completely restored the midjoint contact stresses. Both techniques restored anterior stability at flexion angles ≤30°; however, neither restored anterior stability at 60° and 90° of flexion. Both reconstruction techniques restored coupled anterior translation under combined moments. Additionally, the AE procedure overconstrained internal rotation in response to combined moments by 12% at 15° of flexion.Both reconstruction techniques provide anterior and rotational stability and decrease posterior joint contact stresses compared with the ACL-deficient knee. However, neither restored the contact mechanics and kinematics of the ACL-intact knee.Because the AE reconstruction technique has clinical advantages over the OT procedure, the results support this technique as a potential candidate for use in the skeletally immature athlete." @default.
- W2095865619 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2095865619 creator A5004725668 @default.
- W2095865619 creator A5057295605 @default.
- W2095865619 creator A5061864711 @default.
- W2095865619 creator A5065085077 @default.
- W2095865619 creator A5069276581 @default.
- W2095865619 creator A5070636730 @default.
- W2095865619 date "2013-04-23" @default.
- W2095865619 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2095865619 title "Contact Stress and Kinematic Analysis of All-Epiphyseal and Over-the-Top Pediatric Reconstruction Techniques for the Anterior Cruciate Ligament" @default.
- W2095865619 cites W1633116127 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W1882599226 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W1928968758 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W1929199757 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W1964189028 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W1967569324 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W1978312145 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W1985494366 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W1989644575 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W1989955041 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W1993185003 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2002497497 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2003546050 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2004208846 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2017676256 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2049885681 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2051398229 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2057782916 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2063993024 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2064776165 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2066372759 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2078936766 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2088041356 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2097765808 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2101197534 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2105163276 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2112480300 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2114354263 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2118588469 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2135521547 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2161003643 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2163273427 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2164414671 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2166019794 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2171126701 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2191770411 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2226322137 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2323031776 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2334921572 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W2408765871 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W24474524 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W4233999689 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W4236169181 @default.
- W2095865619 cites W4237383166 @default.
- W2095865619 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513483269" @default.
- W2095865619 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4041132" @default.
- W2095865619 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23613444" @default.
- W2095865619 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2095865619 type Work @default.
- W2095865619 sameAs 2095865619 @default.
- W2095865619 citedByCount "45" @default.
- W2095865619 countsByYear W20958656192014 @default.
- W2095865619 countsByYear W20958656192015 @default.
- W2095865619 countsByYear W20958656192016 @default.
- W2095865619 countsByYear W20958656192017 @default.
- W2095865619 countsByYear W20958656192018 @default.
- W2095865619 countsByYear W20958656192019 @default.
- W2095865619 countsByYear W20958656192020 @default.
- W2095865619 countsByYear W20958656192022 @default.
- W2095865619 countsByYear W20958656192023 @default.
- W2095865619 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2095865619 hasAuthorship W2095865619A5004725668 @default.
- W2095865619 hasAuthorship W2095865619A5057295605 @default.
- W2095865619 hasAuthorship W2095865619A5061864711 @default.
- W2095865619 hasAuthorship W2095865619A5065085077 @default.
- W2095865619 hasAuthorship W2095865619A5069276581 @default.
- W2095865619 hasAuthorship W2095865619A5070636730 @default.
- W2095865619 hasBestOaLocation W20958656192 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C170700871 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C189178095 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C2778434673 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C2780695755 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C2780887989 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C2908736133 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C39920418 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConcept C74650414 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConceptScore W2095865619C105702510 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConceptScore W2095865619C120665830 @default.
- W2095865619 hasConceptScore W2095865619C121332964 @default.