FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2095892981> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2095892981 endingPage "251" @default.
• W2095892981 startingPage "246" @default.
• W2095892981 abstract "Objective To determine if routine follow-up diuresis renography is indicated in all adult patients after pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Methods A multicenter retrospective analysis was conducted in adults who underwent pyeloplasty for symptomatic UPJO between January 2002 and August 2012. Patients with unilateral UPJO demonstrated on diuresis renography, treated with pyeloplasty, and aged >18 years at time of surgery were included in the study. Patients with contralateral renal abnormalities, genitourinary anomalies, and those who declined renography during follow-up were excluded. All eligible patients underwent diuresis renography approximately 3 months postoperatively. Minimal follow-up was 12 months. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with persistent pain at 3 months after pyeloplasty and patients who became asymptomatic. Treatment failures in each cohort were identified. Comparisons were performed using the Fisher exact test. Results A total of 100 pyeloplasties were performed. Of them, 90 were eligible for the study. Mean age was 40 years. Mean follow-up was 21 months. Seventy-three patients (81.1%) became pain free after pyeloplasty. One patient (1.4%) had worsening of differential renal function despite unobstructed drainage on diuresis renogram. None of the patients in the asymptomatic cohort was identified to have unequivocal drainage obstruction on postoperative renogram. Seventeen patients (18.9%) remained symptomatic with pain at 3 months after pyeloplasty; 3 (17.6%) of those patients with loin pain after pyeloplasty were confirmed to have persistent obstructed drainage postoperatively on diuresis renogram (P <.001). All 3 patients required insertion of ureteric stents and/or revision surgery (P <.007). Conclusion In our series, adult patients who became pain free after unilateral pyeloplasty for UPJO did not have persistent obstruction of renal drainage on renography. Routine diuresis renogram to assess drainage and differential renal function in patients who become pain free after pyeloplasty for UPJO may not be necessary. If objective evidence of postoperative outcome is required, then a single renogram at 3 months is recommended. To determine if routine follow-up diuresis renography is indicated in all adult patients after pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). A multicenter retrospective analysis was conducted in adults who underwent pyeloplasty for symptomatic UPJO between January 2002 and August 2012. Patients with unilateral UPJO demonstrated on diuresis renography, treated with pyeloplasty, and aged >18 years at time of surgery were included in the study. Patients with contralateral renal abnormalities, genitourinary anomalies, and those who declined renography during follow-up were excluded. All eligible patients underwent diuresis renography approximately 3 months postoperatively. Minimal follow-up was 12 months. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with persistent pain at 3 months after pyeloplasty and patients who became asymptomatic. Treatment failures in each cohort were identified. Comparisons were performed using the Fisher exact test. A total of 100 pyeloplasties were performed. Of them, 90 were eligible for the study. Mean age was 40 years. Mean follow-up was 21 months. Seventy-three patients (81.1%) became pain free after pyeloplasty. One patient (1.4%) had worsening of differential renal function despite unobstructed drainage on diuresis renogram. None of the patients in the asymptomatic cohort was identified to have unequivocal drainage obstruction on postoperative renogram. Seventeen patients (18.9%) remained symptomatic with pain at 3 months after pyeloplasty; 3 (17.6%) of those patients with loin pain after pyeloplasty were confirmed to have persistent obstructed drainage postoperatively on diuresis renogram (P <.001). All 3 patients required insertion of ureteric stents and/or revision surgery (P <.007). In our series, adult patients who became pain free after unilateral pyeloplasty for UPJO did not have persistent obstruction of renal drainage on renography. Routine diuresis renogram to assess drainage and differential renal function in patients who become pain free after pyeloplasty for UPJO may not be necessary. If objective evidence of postoperative outcome is required, then a single renogram at 3 months is recommended." @default.
• W2095892981 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2095892981 creator A5004753042 @default.
• W2095892981 creator A5008075197 @default.
• W2095892981 creator A5009477637 @default.
• W2095892981 creator A5014527262 @default.
• W2095892981 creator A5036833504 @default.
• W2095892981 creator A5059549729 @default.
• W2095892981 creator A5060464045 @default.
• W2095892981 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2095892981 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2095892981 title "Is Routine Postoperative Diuresis Renography Indicated in All Adult Patients After Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction?" @default.
• W2095892981 cites W1573500324 @default.
• W2095892981 cites W1649659372 @default.
• W2095892981 cites W1988828402 @default.
• W2095892981 cites W1993929821 @default.
• W2095892981 cites W2019771333 @default.
• W2095892981 cites W2026410177 @default.
• W2095892981 cites W2027441113 @default.
• W2095892981 cites W2034379540 @default.
• W2095892981 cites W2039413730 @default.
• W2095892981 cites W2054201831 @default.
• W2095892981 cites W2070625563 @default.
• W2095892981 cites W2111482420 @default.
• W2095892981 cites W2133467346 @default.
• W2095892981 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.033" @default.
• W2095892981 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25530392" @default.
• W2095892981 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2095892981 type Work @default.
• W2095892981 sameAs 2095892981 @default.
• W2095892981 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2095892981 countsByYear W20958929812015 @default.
• W2095892981 countsByYear W20958929812017 @default.
• W2095892981 countsByYear W20958929812018 @default.
• W2095892981 countsByYear W20958929812019 @default.
• W2095892981 countsByYear W20958929812020 @default.
• W2095892981 countsByYear W20958929812021 @default.
• W2095892981 countsByYear W20958929812023 @default.
• W2095892981 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2095892981 hasAuthorship W2095892981A5004753042 @default.
• W2095892981 hasAuthorship W2095892981A5008075197 @default.
• W2095892981 hasAuthorship W2095892981A5009477637 @default.
• W2095892981 hasAuthorship W2095892981A5014527262 @default.
• W2095892981 hasAuthorship W2095892981A5036833504 @default.
• W2095892981 hasAuthorship W2095892981A5059549729 @default.
• W2095892981 hasAuthorship W2095892981A5060464045 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConcept C159641895 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConcept C2777626661 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConcept C2777910003 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConcept C2779547328 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConcept C2781040948 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConcept C2781182678 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConceptScore W2095892981C126322002 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConceptScore W2095892981C141071460 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConceptScore W2095892981C159641895 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConceptScore W2095892981C167135981 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConceptScore W2095892981C2777626661 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConceptScore W2095892981C2777910003 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConceptScore W2095892981C2779547328 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConceptScore W2095892981C2781040948 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConceptScore W2095892981C2781182678 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConceptScore W2095892981C71924100 @default.
• W2095892981 hasConceptScore W2095892981C77411442 @default.
• W2095892981 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2095892981 hasLocation W20958929811 @default.
• W2095892981 hasLocation W20958929812 @default.
• W2095892981 hasOpenAccess W2095892981 @default.
• W2095892981 hasPrimaryLocation W20958929811 @default.
• W2095892981 hasRelatedWork W1982839602 @default.
• W2095892981 hasRelatedWork W1986946153 @default.
• W2095892981 hasRelatedWork W1996997541 @default.
• W2095892981 hasRelatedWork W2018045448 @default.
• W2095892981 hasRelatedWork W2095892981 @default.
• W2095892981 hasRelatedWork W2142877873 @default.
• W2095892981 hasRelatedWork W2429806463 @default.
• W2095892981 hasRelatedWork W4229458473 @default.
• W2095892981 hasRelatedWork W4294281611 @default.
• W2095892981 hasRelatedWork W2789449333 @default.
• W2095892981 hasVolume "85" @default.
• W2095892981 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2095892981 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2095892981 magId "2095892981" @default.
• W2095892981 workType "article" @default.