FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2095972394> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2095972394 endingPage "611" @default.
• W2095972394 startingPage "611" @default.
• W2095972394 abstract "Editor—The review by McAlister et al of secondary prevention programmes in coronary heart disease does not adhere to some of the major principals of good practice when conducting systematic reviews of the medical literature.1–3 These include a clearly defined research question, strict inclusion criteria so that the review can be replicated, an exhaustive search of the medical literature to find all relevant studies, and findings that can be interpreted easily by the reader and relate to clinical practice.McAlister et al, at first glance, have chosen a huge area of the medical literature to review, encompassing both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. On closer inspection, they say that it is their intention to review the literature concerned with disease management programmes for coronary heart disease. The definition of disease management programmes used is broad and is quoted as that proposed by Hunter et al as a combination of patient education, provider use of practice guidelines, appropriate consultation, and supplies of drugs and ancillary services; from the same source, Hunter et al also say that the spectrum of disease management extends from health promotion and disease prevention, through diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation to long term care.4 This highlights the need to be absolutely explicit about the inclusion and exclusion criteria applied to a review in this area.The trials included in the review are a mix of nursing and multidisciplinary team interventions, and also comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programmes. Single modality rehabilitation programmes were excluded. Many trials of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation—which should be considered admissible under the umbrella of disease management programmes—are missing from studies included in the review. A recent Cochrane review of exercise based rehabilitation for coronary heart disease, which was not picked up with the search strategy used by McAlister et al, cites at least 17 trials concerned with comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation that could have also been included in the review by McAlister et al.5 Including these trials in the current review results in a pooled odds ratio for all cause mortality of 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.0).A precise definition of disease management programmes is problematic, but using the authors' own description, it seems that deficiencies in searching and application of inclusion criteria have resulted in a review that that is difficult to interpret, is not replicable, and is potentially misleading." @default.
• W2095972394 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2095972394 creator A5052174968 @default.
• W2095972394 creator A5060634423 @default.
• W2095972394 date "2002-03-09" @default.
• W2095972394 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2095972394 title "Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease" @default.
• W2095972394 cites W2059196353 @default.
• W2095972394 cites W2060468615 @default.
• W2095972394 cites W2107328434 @default.
• W2095972394 cites W2161485389 @default.
• W2095972394 cites W2414167269 @default.
• W2095972394 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7337.611" @default.
• W2095972394 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1122525" @default.
• W2095972394 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11887886" @default.
• W2095972394 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2095972394 type Work @default.
• W2095972394 sameAs 2095972394 @default.
• W2095972394 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2095972394 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2095972394 hasAuthorship W2095972394A5052174968 @default.
• W2095972394 hasAuthorship W2095972394A5060634423 @default.
• W2095972394 hasBestOaLocation W20959723942 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConcept C2994432733 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConcept C3018906752 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConcept C3019417119 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConceptScore W2095972394C126322002 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConceptScore W2095972394C136764020 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConceptScore W2095972394C164705383 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConceptScore W2095972394C2522767166 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConceptScore W2095972394C2994432733 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConceptScore W2095972394C3018906752 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConceptScore W2095972394C3019417119 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConceptScore W2095972394C41008148 @default.
• W2095972394 hasConceptScore W2095972394C71924100 @default.
• W2095972394 hasIssue "7337" @default.
• W2095972394 hasLocation W20959723941 @default.
• W2095972394 hasLocation W20959723942 @default.
• W2095972394 hasLocation W20959723943 @default.
• W2095972394 hasLocation W20959723944 @default.
• W2095972394 hasOpenAccess W2095972394 @default.
• W2095972394 hasPrimaryLocation W20959723941 @default.
• W2095972394 hasRelatedWork W2015448836 @default.
• W2095972394 hasRelatedWork W2024056445 @default.
• W2095972394 hasRelatedWork W2090689793 @default.
• W2095972394 hasRelatedWork W2390633608 @default.
• W2095972394 hasRelatedWork W2410876956 @default.
• W2095972394 hasRelatedWork W2468342788 @default.
• W2095972394 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2095972394 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2095972394 hasRelatedWork W3029502618 @default.
• W2095972394 hasRelatedWork W166662075 @default.
• W2095972394 hasVolume "324" @default.
• W2095972394 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2095972394 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2095972394 magId "2095972394" @default.
• W2095972394 workType "article" @default.