Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2095996801> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W2095996801 endingPage "68" @default.
- W2095996801 startingPage "66" @default.
- W2095996801 abstract "You have just moved to a new town to open up your internal medicine practice, and now must find a doctor for your own young family. Two doctors are accepting new patients:Jane completed residency 2 years ago, and scored in the top 2% of her class on the certification exams.Susan completed residency 10 years ago, and scored in the top 25% of her class on the certification exams. Who do you choose?When this question has been posed to large clinical audiences over the past few years, only half a dozen people ever choose Jane over Susan. Why? Most people would accept that not only did Susan start off worse in formal knowledge, but also that it is very likely that her knowledge and application of current recommended care is likely to have fallen off further, as Choudhry et al have shown in a recent systematic review.1 Why, then, do audiences so unanimously choose the more experienced practitioner?Perhaps for just that reason—experience. The practice of medicine, like many other areas of human endeavour, requires considerable “hands on” experience to achieve mastery. Most physicians, when asked, indicate that they did not really feel competent for several years after they entered practice, which tallies with estimates from other domains that suggest 10 years or 10 000 hours are required to become a virtuoso.2 But what is gained from experience?Unfortunately, if you believe the conclusions of Choudhry et al , the answer is that nothing is gained and much is lost. They claim to have identified several studies where increasing years in practice are associated with increased mortality. But on closer scrutiny, the differences, when present, are small. The paper states that, in the best study of outcome,3 every year since graduation resulted in an increase of …" @default.
- W2095996801 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2095996801 creator A5010582683 @default.
- W2095996801 creator A5030421646 @default.
- W2095996801 date "2005-06-01" @default.
- W2095996801 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2095996801 title "Does clinical experience make up for failure to keep up to date?" @default.
- W2095996801 cites W1968217593 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W1974476540 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W1978094362 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W1979866174 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W1989691238 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W1993170512 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2014347290 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2016103676 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2016814724 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2029342902 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2064228794 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2064286884 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2068548108 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2086245315 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2091064227 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2098302682 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2115173015 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2123043494 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2132680454 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2134551201 @default.
- W2095996801 cites W2169860454 @default.
- W2095996801 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm.10.3.66-a" @default.
- W2095996801 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15862054" @default.
- W2095996801 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W2095996801 type Work @default.
- W2095996801 sameAs 2095996801 @default.
- W2095996801 citedByCount "11" @default.
- W2095996801 countsByYear W20959968012012 @default.
- W2095996801 countsByYear W20959968012014 @default.
- W2095996801 countsByYear W20959968012019 @default.
- W2095996801 countsByYear W20959968012021 @default.
- W2095996801 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2095996801 hasAuthorship W2095996801A5010582683 @default.
- W2095996801 hasAuthorship W2095996801A5030421646 @default.
- W2095996801 hasBestOaLocation W20959968011 @default.
- W2095996801 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
- W2095996801 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2095996801 hasConceptScore W2095996801C177713679 @default.
- W2095996801 hasConceptScore W2095996801C71924100 @default.
- W2095996801 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2095996801 hasLocation W20959968011 @default.
- W2095996801 hasLocation W20959968012 @default.
- W2095996801 hasOpenAccess W2095996801 @default.
- W2095996801 hasPrimaryLocation W20959968011 @default.
- W2095996801 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
- W2095996801 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
- W2095996801 hasRelatedWork W2039318446 @default.
- W2095996801 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
- W2095996801 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
- W2095996801 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2095996801 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2095996801 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
- W2095996801 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
- W2095996801 hasRelatedWork W4252371801 @default.
- W2095996801 hasVolume "10" @default.
- W2095996801 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2095996801 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2095996801 magId "2095996801" @default.
- W2095996801 workType "article" @default.