FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2096088894> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2096088894 endingPage "e107" @default.
• W2096088894 startingPage "e101" @default.
• W2096088894 abstract "Purpose Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) requires a high degree of expertise compared with standard radiation therapy (RT). We performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients treated with IMRT compared with standard RT to assess outcomes in national practice. Methods and Materials Using the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–Medicare linked database, we identified patients treated with radiation for cancer of the head and neck from 2002 to 2005. We used multivariate Cox models to determine whether the receipt of IMRT was associated with differences in survival. Results We identified 1613 patients, 33.7% of whom received IMRT. IMRT was not associated with differences in survival: the 3-year overall survival was 50.5% for IMRT vs. 49.6% for standard RT (p = 0.47). The 3-year cancer-specific survival was 60.0% for IMRT vs. 58.8% (p = 0.45). Conclusion Despite its complexity and resource intensive nature, IMRT use seems to be as safe as standard RT in national community practice, because the use of IMRT did not have an adverse impact on survival. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) requires a high degree of expertise compared with standard radiation therapy (RT). We performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients treated with IMRT compared with standard RT to assess outcomes in national practice. Using the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–Medicare linked database, we identified patients treated with radiation for cancer of the head and neck from 2002 to 2005. We used multivariate Cox models to determine whether the receipt of IMRT was associated with differences in survival. We identified 1613 patients, 33.7% of whom received IMRT. IMRT was not associated with differences in survival: the 3-year overall survival was 50.5% for IMRT vs. 49.6% for standard RT (p = 0.47). The 3-year cancer-specific survival was 60.0% for IMRT vs. 58.8% (p = 0.45). Despite its complexity and resource intensive nature, IMRT use seems to be as safe as standard RT in national community practice, because the use of IMRT did not have an adverse impact on survival." @default.
• W2096088894 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2096088894 creator A5001974421 @default.
• W2096088894 creator A5006355506 @default.
• W2096088894 creator A5010160289 @default.
• W2096088894 creator A5033836169 @default.
• W2096088894 creator A5037951527 @default.
• W2096088894 creator A5041542657 @default.
• W2096088894 creator A5061395570 @default.
• W2096088894 creator A5067450403 @default.
• W2096088894 creator A5078289544 @default.
• W2096088894 date "2012-05-01" @default.
• W2096088894 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2096088894 title "Patterns of Care and Outcomes Associated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy for Older Patients With Head-and-Neck Cancer" @default.
• W2096088894 cites W1581365839 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W1996267265 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W2040188492 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W2057780602 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W2062225986 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W2091888765 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W2094595050 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W2111719509 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W2115674295 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W2118772763 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W2125640401 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W2130707289 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W2140110477 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W2148511189 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W2315848302 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W4248559216 @default.
• W2096088894 cites W4250849363 @default.
• W2096088894 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.067" @default.
• W2096088894 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22342095" @default.
• W2096088894 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2096088894 type Work @default.
• W2096088894 sameAs 2096088894 @default.
• W2096088894 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2096088894 countsByYear W20960888942013 @default.
• W2096088894 countsByYear W20960888942014 @default.
• W2096088894 countsByYear W20960888942015 @default.
• W2096088894 countsByYear W20960888942016 @default.
• W2096088894 countsByYear W20960888942018 @default.
• W2096088894 countsByYear W20960888942019 @default.
• W2096088894 countsByYear W20960888942020 @default.
• W2096088894 countsByYear W20960888942021 @default.
• W2096088894 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2096088894 hasAuthorship W2096088894A5001974421 @default.
• W2096088894 hasAuthorship W2096088894A5006355506 @default.
• W2096088894 hasAuthorship W2096088894A5010160289 @default.
• W2096088894 hasAuthorship W2096088894A5033836169 @default.
• W2096088894 hasAuthorship W2096088894A5037951527 @default.
• W2096088894 hasAuthorship W2096088894A5041542657 @default.
• W2096088894 hasAuthorship W2096088894A5061395570 @default.
• W2096088894 hasAuthorship W2096088894A5067450403 @default.
• W2096088894 hasAuthorship W2096088894A5078289544 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConcept C107130276 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConcept C2776530083 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConcept C50382708 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConceptScore W2096088894C107130276 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConceptScore W2096088894C121608353 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConceptScore W2096088894C126322002 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConceptScore W2096088894C143998085 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConceptScore W2096088894C167135981 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConceptScore W2096088894C2776530083 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConceptScore W2096088894C50382708 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConceptScore W2096088894C509974204 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConceptScore W2096088894C71924100 @default.
• W2096088894 hasConceptScore W2096088894C72563966 @default.
• W2096088894 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2096088894 hasLocation W20960888941 @default.
• W2096088894 hasLocation W20960888942 @default.
• W2096088894 hasOpenAccess W2096088894 @default.
• W2096088894 hasPrimaryLocation W20960888941 @default.
• W2096088894 hasRelatedWork W2076245797 @default.
• W2096088894 hasRelatedWork W2079678666 @default.
• W2096088894 hasRelatedWork W2086793060 @default.
• W2096088894 hasRelatedWork W2384708512 @default.
• W2096088894 hasRelatedWork W2553255798 @default.
• W2096088894 hasRelatedWork W2603773853 @default.
• W2096088894 hasRelatedWork W3048057313 @default.
• W2096088894 hasRelatedWork W4235542796 @default.
• W2096088894 hasRelatedWork W4304808194 @default.
• W2096088894 hasRelatedWork W4311192294 @default.
• W2096088894 hasVolume "83" @default.
• W2096088894 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2096088894 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2096088894 magId "2096088894" @default.
• W2096088894 workType "article" @default.