FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2096413242> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2096413242 abstract "High-quality review evidence is useful for informing and influencing public health policy and practice decisions. However, certain topic areas lack representation in terms of the quantity and quality of review literature available. The objectives of this paper are to identify the quantity, as well as quality, of review-level evidence available on the effectiveness of public health interventions for public health decision makers. Searches conducted on http://www.health-evidence.ca produced an inventory of public health review literature in 21 topic areas. Gaps and areas of wealth in the review literature, as well as the proportion of reviews rated methodologically strong, moderate, or weak were identified. The top 10 topic areas of interest for registered users and visitors of http://www.health-evidence.ca were extracted from user profile data and Google Analytics. Registered users' top three interests included: 1) healthy communities, 2) chronic diseases, and 3) nutrition. The top three preferences for visitors included: 1) chronic diseases, 2) physical activity, and 3) addiction/substance use. All of the topic areas with many (301+) available reviews were of interest to registered users and/or visitors (mental health, physical activity, addiction/substance use, adolescent health, child health, nutrition, adult health, and chronic diseases). Conversely, the majority of registered users and/or visitors did not have preference for topic areas with few (≤ 150) available reviews (food safety and inspection, dental health, environmental health) with the exception of social determinants of health and healthy communities. Across registered users' and visitors' topic areas of preference, 80.2% of the reviews were of well-done methodological quality, with 43.5% of reviews having a strong quality rating and 36.7% a moderate review quality rating. In topic areas in which many reviews are available, higher level syntheses are needed to guide policy and practice. For other topic areas with few reviews, it is necessary to determine whether primary study evidence exists, or is needed, so that reviews can be conducted in the future. Considering that less than half of the reviews available on http://www.health-evidence.ca are of strong methodological quality, the quality of the review-level evidence needs to improve across the range of public health topic areas." @default.
• W2096413242 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2096413242 creator A5031833577 @default.
• W2096413242 creator A5050039311 @default.
• W2096413242 creator A5050207796 @default.
• W2096413242 creator A5063237932 @default.
• W2096413242 date "2011-10-03" @default.
• W2096413242 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2096413242 title "Missing and accounted for: gaps and areas of wealth in the public health review literature" @default.
• W2096413242 cites W146203330 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W1921374575 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W1966746061 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W1971344453 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2021911961 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2044408039 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2054652515 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2081159411 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2097025238 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2097110957 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2098032053 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2100782080 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2107226523 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2108973014 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2113003681 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2125297083 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2135382511 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2136347951 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2139294896 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2143857113 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2145452196 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2150491173 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2156116585 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2158217395 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2159916918 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2165137003 @default.
• W2096413242 cites W2167619051 @default.
• W2096413242 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-757" @default.
• W2096413242 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3229615" @default.
• W2096413242 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21967658" @default.
• W2096413242 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2096413242 type Work @default.
• W2096413242 sameAs 2096413242 @default.
• W2096413242 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2096413242 countsByYear W20964132422012 @default.
• W2096413242 countsByYear W20964132422014 @default.
• W2096413242 countsByYear W20964132422017 @default.
• W2096413242 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2096413242 hasAuthorship W2096413242A5031833577 @default.
• W2096413242 hasAuthorship W2096413242A5050039311 @default.
• W2096413242 hasAuthorship W2096413242A5050207796 @default.
• W2096413242 hasAuthorship W2096413242A5063237932 @default.
• W2096413242 hasBestOaLocation W20964132421 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConcept C140556311 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConcept C185618831 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConcept C47344431 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConcept C48856860 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConcept C78491826 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConceptScore W2096413242C118552586 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConceptScore W2096413242C134362201 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConceptScore W2096413242C138816342 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConceptScore W2096413242C140556311 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConceptScore W2096413242C159110408 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConceptScore W2096413242C185618831 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConceptScore W2096413242C27415008 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConceptScore W2096413242C47344431 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConceptScore W2096413242C48856860 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConceptScore W2096413242C71924100 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConceptScore W2096413242C78491826 @default.
• W2096413242 hasConceptScore W2096413242C99454951 @default.
• W2096413242 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2096413242 hasLocation W20964132421 @default.
• W2096413242 hasLocation W20964132422 @default.
• W2096413242 hasLocation W20964132423 @default.
• W2096413242 hasLocation W20964132424 @default.
• W2096413242 hasOpenAccess W2096413242 @default.
• W2096413242 hasPrimaryLocation W20964132421 @default.
• W2096413242 hasRelatedWork W186311989 @default.
• W2096413242 hasRelatedWork W1921097127 @default.
• W2096413242 hasRelatedWork W1935682708 @default.
• W2096413242 hasRelatedWork W1999214876 @default.
• W2096413242 hasRelatedWork W2067562061 @default.
• W2096413242 hasRelatedWork W2139027744 @default.
• W2096413242 hasRelatedWork W2163365179 @default.
• W2096413242 hasRelatedWork W2281523798 @default.
• W2096413242 hasRelatedWork W2367505823 @default.
• W2096413242 hasRelatedWork W2593813446 @default.
• W2096413242 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W2096413242 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2096413242 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2096413242 magId "2096413242" @default.
• W2096413242 workType "article" @default.