FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2096738067> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2096738067 abstract "Accurate measurement of the QT interval is very important from a clinical and pharmaceutical drug safety screening perspective. Expert manual measurement is both imprecise and imperfectly reproducible, yet it is used as the reference standard to assess the accuracy of current automatic computer algorithms, which thus produce reproducible but incorrect measurements of the QT interval. There is a scientific imperative to evaluate the most commonly used algorithms with an accurate and objective 'gold standard' and investigate novel automatic algorithms if the commonly used algorithms are found to be deficient.This study uses a validated computer simulation of 8 different noise contaminated ECG waveforms (with known QT intervals of 461 and 495 ms), generated from a cell array using Luo-Rudy membrane kinetics and the Crank-Nicholson method, as a reference standard to assess the accuracy of commonly used QT measurement algorithms. Each ECG contaminated with 39 mixtures of noise at 3 levels of intensity was first filtered then subjected to three threshold methods (T1, T2, T3), two T wave slope methods (S1, S2) and a Novel method. The reproducibility and accuracy of each algorithm was compared for each ECG.The coefficient of variation for methods T1, T2, T3, S1, S2 and Novel were 0.36, 0.23, 1.9, 0.93, 0.92 and 0.62 respectively. For ECGs of real QT interval 461 ms the methods T1, T2, T3, S1, S2 and Novel calculated the mean QT intervals(standard deviations) to be 379.4(1.29), 368.5(0.8), 401.3(8.4), 358.9(4.8), 381.5(4.6) and 464(4.9) ms respectively. For ECGs of real QT interval 495 ms the methods T1, T2, T3, S1, S2 and Novel calculated the mean QT intervals(standard deviations) to be 396.9(1.7), 387.2(0.97), 424.9(8.7), 386.7(2.2), 396.8(2.8) and 493(0.97) ms respectively. These results showed significant differences between means at >95% confidence level. Shifting ECG baselines caused large errors of QT interval with T1 and T2 but no error with Novel.The algorithms T2, T1 and Novel gave low coefficients of variation for QT measurement. The Novel technique gave the most accurate measurement of QT interval, T3 (a differential threshold method) was the next most accurate by a large margin. The objective and accurate 'gold standard' presented in this paper may be useful to assess new QT measurement algorithms. The Novel algorithm may prove to be more accurate and reliable method to measure the QT interval." @default.
• W2096738067 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2096738067 creator A5036189518 @default.
• W2096738067 date "2005-09-26" @default.
• W2096738067 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2096738067 title "Accuracy of popular automatic QT Interval algorithms assessed by a 'Gold Standard' and comparison with a Novel method: computer simulation study" @default.
• W2096738067 cites W1972786559 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W1973076271 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W1975481646 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W1981860274 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2022345575 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2028146834 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2037212218 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2045979817 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2047152727 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2051318552 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2063794300 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2088339616 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2092012936 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2099889091 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2104563593 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2107658445 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2125271591 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W2908757470 @default.
• W2096738067 cites W4233071758 @default.
• W2096738067 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-5-29" @default.
• W2096738067 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1262700" @default.
• W2096738067 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16185361" @default.
• W2096738067 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2096738067 type Work @default.
• W2096738067 sameAs 2096738067 @default.
• W2096738067 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2096738067 countsByYear W20967380672012 @default.
• W2096738067 countsByYear W20967380672013 @default.
• W2096738067 countsByYear W20967380672014 @default.
• W2096738067 countsByYear W20967380672015 @default.
• W2096738067 countsByYear W20967380672017 @default.
• W2096738067 countsByYear W20967380672020 @default.
• W2096738067 countsByYear W20967380672021 @default.
• W2096738067 countsByYear W20967380672022 @default.
• W2096738067 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2096738067 hasAuthorship W2096738067A5036189518 @default.
• W2096738067 hasBestOaLocation W20967380671 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C118441451 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C22679943 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C2778067643 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConcept C99498987 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C105795698 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C11413529 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C114614502 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C115961682 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C118441451 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C154945302 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C164705383 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C22679943 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C2778067643 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C33923547 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C40993552 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C41008148 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C71924100 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C9893847 @default.
• W2096738067 hasConceptScore W2096738067C99498987 @default.
• W2096738067 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2096738067 hasLocation W20967380671 @default.
• W2096738067 hasLocation W20967380672 @default.
• W2096738067 hasLocation W20967380673 @default.
• W2096738067 hasLocation W20967380674 @default.
• W2096738067 hasLocation W20967380675 @default.
• W2096738067 hasOpenAccess W2096738067 @default.
• W2096738067 hasPrimaryLocation W20967380671 @default.
• W2096738067 hasRelatedWork W2061894519 @default.
• W2096738067 hasRelatedWork W2073853883 @default.
• W2096738067 hasRelatedWork W2090532482 @default.
• W2096738067 hasRelatedWork W2181581115 @default.
• W2096738067 hasRelatedWork W2184874144 @default.
• W2096738067 hasRelatedWork W2200015300 @default.
• W2096738067 hasRelatedWork W2295574909 @default.
• W2096738067 hasRelatedWork W2369416013 @default.
• W2096738067 hasRelatedWork W2420322755 @default.
• W2096738067 hasRelatedWork W2734039738 @default.
• W2096738067 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W2096738067 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2096738067 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2096738067 magId "2096738067" @default.
• W2096738067 workType "article" @default.