FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2096759528> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2096759528 endingPage "74" @default.
• W2096759528 startingPage "65" @default.
• W2096759528 abstract "Development of an incisional hernia after abdominal surgery is a common complication following laparotomy. Following recent advancements in laparoscopic and open repair a literature review has demonstrated no difference in the short term outcomes between open and laparoscopic repair, concluding there was no favourable method of repair over the other and that both techniques are appropriate methods of surgical repair. However, long term outcomes in the available literature between these two approaches were not clearly analysed or described. The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic versus open abdominal incisional hernia repair, and to evaluate the short and long term outcomes in regards to hernia recurrence using meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials from 2008 to end of 2013.Patients who developed an abdominal hernia or abdominal incisional hernia following a laparotomy.Two methods of surgical repair, laparoscopic and open abdominal wall hernia repair. Comparison: To compare between laparoscopic and open repair in abdominal wall incisional hernia.length of hospital stay, operation time, wound infection and hernia recurrence rate.This study is a systematic review on all randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus open abdominal wall and incisional hernia repair. Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane library, Cinahl and Embase were the databases interrogated. Inclusion & exclusion criteria had been defined. The relevant studies identified from January 2008 to December 2013, are included in the analysis. The primary end point can be described as hernia recurrence, and secondary outcomes can be described as length of hospital stay post operatively, operation time and wound infection.Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and included in the final analysis with a total number of 611 patients randomized. Three hundreds and six patients were in the laparoscopic group and 305 patients in the open repair group. The range of follow up in the studies was two months to 35 months. The recurrence rate was similar (P = 0.30), wound infection was higher in the open repair group (P < 0.001), length of hospital stay was not statistically different (P = 0.92), and finally the operation time was longer in the laparoscopic group but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.05) CONCLUSION: The short and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open abdominal wall hernia repairs are equivalent; both techniques are safe and credible and the outcomes are very comparable." @default.
• W2096759528 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2096759528 creator A5038531695 @default.
• W2096759528 creator A5043967915 @default.
• W2096759528 creator A5065838509 @default.
• W2096759528 creator A5083905105 @default.
• W2096759528 date "2015-08-01" @default.
• W2096759528 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W2096759528 title "A systematic review of laparoscopic versus open abdominal incisional hernia repair, with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" @default.
• W2096759528 cites W110125952 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1517122477 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1576560392 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1583057736 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1585221476 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1768900926 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1964726553 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1967530203 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1968247393 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1971252022 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1973606699 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1974384139 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1985903610 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1990303808 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W1999323850 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2007581003 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2012253178 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2012658302 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2017114388 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2021353584 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2023153884 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2033705419 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2038083895 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2050082389 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2050637558 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2052158582 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2070261595 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2071405518 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2078442578 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2095403006 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2118139484 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2122618646 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2127900288 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2158553433 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W2165053748 @default.
• W2096759528 cites W4321060064 @default.
• W2096759528 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.050" @default.
• W2096759528 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26074289" @default.
• W2096759528 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2096759528 type Work @default.
• W2096759528 sameAs 2096759528 @default.
• W2096759528 citedByCount "142" @default.
• W2096759528 countsByYear W20967595282016 @default.
• W2096759528 countsByYear W20967595282017 @default.
• W2096759528 countsByYear W20967595282018 @default.
• W2096759528 countsByYear W20967595282019 @default.
• W2096759528 countsByYear W20967595282020 @default.
• W2096759528 countsByYear W20967595282021 @default.
• W2096759528 countsByYear W20967595282022 @default.
• W2096759528 countsByYear W20967595282023 @default.
• W2096759528 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2096759528 hasAuthorship W2096759528A5038531695 @default.
• W2096759528 hasAuthorship W2096759528A5043967915 @default.
• W2096759528 hasAuthorship W2096759528A5065838509 @default.
• W2096759528 hasAuthorship W2096759528A5083905105 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C2776724281 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C2777140462 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C2778754067 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C2779096551 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C2780778865 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C126322002 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C141071460 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C168563851 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C2776478404 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C2776724281 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C2777140462 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C2778754067 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C2779096551 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C2780047204 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C2780120127 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C2780778865 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C61434518 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C71924100 @default.
• W2096759528 hasConceptScore W2096759528C95190672 @default.
• W2096759528 hasLocation W20967595281 @default.
• W2096759528 hasLocation W20967595282 @default.
• W2096759528 hasOpenAccess W2096759528 @default.
• W2096759528 hasPrimaryLocation W20967595281 @default.
• W2096759528 hasRelatedWork W1895602847 @default.
• W2096759528 hasRelatedWork W1977751820 @default.

• next