FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2096822215> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2096822215 endingPage "593" @default.
• W2096822215 startingPage "577" @default.
• W2096822215 abstract "Abstract: In 2003, we compared two benthic macroinvertebrate sampling methods that are used for rapid biological assessment of wadeable streams. A single habitat method using kick sampling in riffles and runs was compared to a multiple habitat method that sampled all available habitats in proportion of occurrence. Both methods were performed side‐by‐side at 41 sites in lower gradient streams of the Piedmont and Northern Piedmont ecoregions of the United States, where riffle habitat is less abundant. Differences in sampling methods were examined using similarity indices, two multimetric indices [the family‐level Virginia Stream Condition Index (VSCI) and the species‐level Macroinvertebrate Biotic Integrity Index (MBII)], their component metrics, and bioassessment endpoints based on each index. Index scores were highly correlated between single and multiple habitat field methods, and sampling method comparability, based on comparison of similarities between and within sampling methods, was particularly high for species level data. The VSCI scores and values of most of its component metrics were not significantly higher for one particular method, but relationships between single and multiple habitat values were highly variable for percent Ephemeroptera, percent chironomids, and percent Plecoptera and Trichoptera (Hydropsychidae excluded). A similar level of variability in the relationship was observed for the MBII and most of its metrics, but Ephemeroptera richness, percent individuals in the dominant five taxa, and Hilsenhoff Biotic Index scores all exhibited differences in values between single and multiple habitat field methods. When applied to multiple habitat samples, the MBII exhibited greater precision, higher index scores, and higher assessment categories than when applied to single habitat samples at the same sites. In streams with limited or no riffle habitats, the multiple habitat method should provide an adequate sample for biological assessment, and at sites with abundant riffle habitat, little difference would be expected between the single and multiple habitat field methods. Thus, in geographic areas with a wide variety of stream types, the multiple habitat method may be more desirable. Even so, the variability in the relationship between single and multiple habitat methods indicates that the data are not interchangeable, and we suggest that any change in sampling method should be accompanied by a recalibration of any existing assessment tool (e.g., multimetric index) with data collected using the new method, regardless of taxonomic level." @default.
• W2096822215 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2096822215 creator A5012442606 @default.
• W2096822215 creator A5039721696 @default.
• W2096822215 creator A5061044529 @default.
• W2096822215 creator A5089566617 @default.
• W2096822215 date "2008-04-04" @default.
• W2096822215 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2096822215 title "A Comparison of Single and Multiple Habitat Protocols for Collecting Macroinvertebrates in Wadeable Streams" @default.
• W2096822215 cites W1518628939 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W1977751865 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W1979232381 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W1984662551 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W1990755513 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W2012772842 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W2025335482 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W2028352681 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W2030446028 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W2063136052 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W2083715806 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W2085246860 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W2089210870 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W2091655353 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W2104767862 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W2127761256 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W2146258419 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W2174249887 @default.
• W2096822215 cites W4233331630 @default.
• W2096822215 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00183.x" @default.
• W2096822215 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2096822215 type Work @default.
• W2096822215 sameAs 2096822215 @default.
• W2096822215 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2096822215 countsByYear W20968222152012 @default.
• W2096822215 countsByYear W20968222152013 @default.
• W2096822215 countsByYear W20968222152015 @default.
• W2096822215 countsByYear W20968222152017 @default.
• W2096822215 countsByYear W20968222152019 @default.
• W2096822215 countsByYear W20968222152020 @default.
• W2096822215 countsByYear W20968222152021 @default.
• W2096822215 countsByYear W20968222152022 @default.
• W2096822215 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2096822215 hasAuthorship W2096822215A5012442606 @default.
• W2096822215 hasAuthorship W2096822215A5039721696 @default.
• W2096822215 hasAuthorship W2096822215A5061044529 @default.
• W2096822215 hasAuthorship W2096822215A5089566617 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C106131492 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C13474642 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C140779682 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C2777947409 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C42090638 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C53565203 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C56978610 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C76886044 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C83042747 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConcept C94042126 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C106131492 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C127313418 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C13474642 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C140779682 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C185933670 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C187320778 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C18903297 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C2777947409 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C31258907 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C31972630 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C39432304 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C41008148 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C42090638 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C53565203 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C56978610 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C76886044 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C83042747 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C86803240 @default.
• W2096822215 hasConceptScore W2096822215C94042126 @default.
• W2096822215 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2096822215 hasLocation W20968222151 @default.
• W2096822215 hasOpenAccess W2096822215 @default.
• W2096822215 hasPrimaryLocation W20968222151 @default.
• W2096822215 hasRelatedWork W1496589075 @default.
• W2096822215 hasRelatedWork W1982793386 @default.
• W2096822215 hasRelatedWork W2003994939 @default.
• W2096822215 hasRelatedWork W2079033303 @default.
• W2096822215 hasRelatedWork W2096822215 @default.
• W2096822215 hasRelatedWork W2123327780 @default.
• W2096822215 hasRelatedWork W2147185123 @default.
• W2096822215 hasRelatedWork W2168986158 @default.
• W2096822215 hasRelatedWork W2176503896 @default.
• W2096822215 hasRelatedWork W3163549595 @default.

• next