FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2098262911> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2098262911 endingPage "373" @default.
• W2098262911 startingPage "373" @default.
• W2098262911 abstract "The series published by Davydov and associates [1] on extended resection of esophageal carcinoma associated with fistula seems to be unique in the recent literature. Although the paper reflects the high skill and courage of the authors some theoretical and practical questions remain open. The first one is that is it justified to perform extended esophageal resection in an advanced stage of the disease when even by combined resections (lung, pericardium, diaphragm, etc.) oncologically an RO status cannot be obtained? The majority of the esophageal surgeons with waste experience (Akiyama, Skinner, Siewert, etc.) consider that esophageal carcinomas invading into the mediastinum are not suitable for resection. The effort of the authors to perform such surgery is remarkable, but the high postoperative morbidity (40%) and mortality rate (13.6%) reveal the high risk of such kind of surgery. The second one is that when the fistula is associated with airway invasion and stricture, removal of the tumor is contraindicated by technical and oncological reasons. In the by-pass group of the patients the rout, the type of the ten esophagogastric by-pass and the level of the proximal anastomosis is not clearly indicated in the text. I agree with the authors that exclusion by-pass of tracheoesophageal fistulas offer the best palliation and nutritional conditions if the patients can tolerate such type of surgery. The magnitude of this procedure is well demonstrated by the 20% postoperative mortality of this series. In our 59 malignant esophagorespiratory fistulas only one patient was in a condition permitting exclusion by-pass operation. In the other 57 cases with severely affected respiratory function and/or malnutrition by inoperable esophageal or bronchial carcinoma, fistula obliteration by esophageal intubation [2] was the unique treatment modality as in other large series [3]. In the most critical fistulas with airway invasion and stricture, as a first step we performed airway stenting, followed by esophageal intubation in ten patients. Like other authors we found that the airway stents alone cannot exclude such fistulas, so combination with esophageal tube or stent implantation [4,5] is mandatory. Using our composite cuffed funnel tube with minimal invasive insertion technique [2] the overall mortality rate was 5.4% and the postoperative morbidity only 1.8%. All our survivors had resumed on oral soft diet. In the large majority of such fistulas palliation with special esophageal tubes or esophageal and bronchial stent, may be considered a low risk, effective management." @default.
• W2098262911 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2098262911 creator A5004626114 @default.
• W2098262911 creator A5041376656 @default.
• W2098262911 creator A5065521548 @default.
• W2098262911 date "2002-02-01" @default.
• W2098262911 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2098262911 title "The risk of surgical procedures for the treatment of malignant respiratory fistulas" @default.
• W2098262911 cites W2006329075 @default.
• W2098262911 cites W2039584595 @default.
• W2098262911 cites W2051107627 @default.
• W2098262911 cites W2052017971 @default.
• W2098262911 cites W2073651172 @default.
• W2098262911 cites W2083576086 @default.
• W2098262911 cites W2086456010 @default.
• W2098262911 cites W2109728792 @default.
• W2098262911 cites W2413417288 @default.
• W2098262911 cites W2414471053 @default.
• W2098262911 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(01)01092-2" @default.
• W2098262911 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11825767" @default.
• W2098262911 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2098262911 type Work @default.
• W2098262911 sameAs 2098262911 @default.
• W2098262911 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2098262911 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2098262911 hasAuthorship W2098262911A5004626114 @default.
• W2098262911 hasAuthorship W2098262911A5041376656 @default.
• W2098262911 hasAuthorship W2098262911A5065521548 @default.
• W2098262911 hasBestOaLocation W20982629111 @default.
• W2098262911 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2098262911 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2098262911 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2098262911 hasConcept C534529494 @default.
• W2098262911 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2098262911 hasConceptScore W2098262911C126322002 @default.
• W2098262911 hasConceptScore W2098262911C126838900 @default.
• W2098262911 hasConceptScore W2098262911C141071460 @default.
• W2098262911 hasConceptScore W2098262911C534529494 @default.
• W2098262911 hasConceptScore W2098262911C71924100 @default.
• W2098262911 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2098262911 hasLocation W20982629111 @default.
• W2098262911 hasLocation W20982629112 @default.
• W2098262911 hasOpenAccess W2098262911 @default.
• W2098262911 hasPrimaryLocation W20982629111 @default.
• W2098262911 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W2098262911 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2098262911 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2098262911 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2098262911 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2098262911 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2098262911 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2098262911 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2098262911 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
• W2098262911 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2098262911 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W2098262911 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2098262911 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2098262911 magId "2098262911" @default.
• W2098262911 workType "article" @default.