FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2098752968> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2098752968 endingPage "1623" @default.
• W2098752968 startingPage "1612" @default.
• W2098752968 abstract "Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing has shown higher sensitivity than cytology for detecting cervical lesions, but it is uncertain whether the higher sensitivity is dependent on the age of the woman being screened. We compared the age-specific performance of primary HPV DNA screening with that of conventional cytology screening in the setting of an organized population-based cervical cancer screening program in Finland.From January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2005, randomized invitations were sent to women aged 25-65 years for routine cervical cancer screening by primary high-risk HPV DNA testing (n = 54 207) with a Hybrid Capture 2 assay followed by cytology triage for women who were HPV DNA positive or by conventional cytology screening (n = 54 218). In both screening arms, cytology results of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse triggered a referral for colposcopy. Relative rates (RRs) of detection to assess test sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPVs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the histological endpoints of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 1 or higher (CIN 1+), CIN grade 2 or higher (CIN 2+), and CIN grade 3 or higher (CIN 3+). All statistical tests were two-sided.The overall frequency of colposcopy referrals was 1.2% in both screening arms. Women younger than 35 years were referred more often in the HPV DNA screening vs the conventional screening arm (RR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.60). The prevalence of histologically confirmed CIN or cancer was 0.59% in the HPV DNA screening arm vs 0.43% in the conventional screening arm. The relative rates of detection for CIN 1, CIN 2, and CIN 3+ for HPV DNA screening with cytology triage vs conventional screening were 1.44 (95% CI = 0.99 to 2.10), 1.39 (95% CI = 1.03 to 1.88), and 1.22 (95% CI = 0.78 to 1.92), respectively. The specificity of the HPV DNA test with cytology triage was equal to that of conventional screening for all age groups (99.2% vs 99.1% for CIN 2+, P = .13). Among women aged 35 years or older, the HPV DNA test with cytology triage tended to have higher specificity than conventional screening. The PPVs for HPV DNA screening with cytology triage were consistently higher than those for conventional screening. In both screening arms, the test specificities increased with increasing age of the women being screening, whereas the highest PPVs were observed among the youngest women being screened. Overall, 7.2% of women in the HPV DNA screening arm vs 6.6% of women in the conventional screening arm were recommended for intensified follow-up, and the percentages were highest among 25- to 29-year-olds (21.9% vs 10.0%, respectively).Primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage is more sensitive than conventional screening. Among women aged 35 years or older, primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage is also more specific than conventional screening and decreases colposcopy referrals and follow-up tests." @default.
• W2098752968 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2098752968 creator A5000688612 @default.
• W2098752968 creator A5037710040 @default.
• W2098752968 creator A5053425477 @default.
• W2098752968 creator A5069035614 @default.
• W2098752968 creator A5071210488 @default.
• W2098752968 creator A5082823961 @default.
• W2098752968 creator A5085063339 @default.
• W2098752968 date "2009-11-09" @default.
• W2098752968 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2098752968 title "Age-Specific Evaluation of Primary Human Papillomavirus Screening vs Conventional Cytology in a Randomized Setting" @default.
• W2098752968 cites W1511886371 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W1973908661 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W1980750660 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W1998023123 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2009082272 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2009256930 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2027259858 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2031739759 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2061505756 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2082070348 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2093714479 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2095250514 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2102791909 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2111855638 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2114212562 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2116458357 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2126725601 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2129220851 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2130272997 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2142575677 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2153941399 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2153952034 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2162034430 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W2170513471 @default.
• W2098752968 cites W4240777490 @default.
• W2098752968 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp367" @default.
• W2098752968 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19903804" @default.
• W2098752968 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2098752968 type Work @default.
• W2098752968 sameAs 2098752968 @default.
• W2098752968 citedByCount "226" @default.
• W2098752968 countsByYear W20987529682012 @default.
• W2098752968 countsByYear W20987529682013 @default.
• W2098752968 countsByYear W20987529682014 @default.
• W2098752968 countsByYear W20987529682015 @default.
• W2098752968 countsByYear W20987529682016 @default.
• W2098752968 countsByYear W20987529682017 @default.
• W2098752968 countsByYear W20987529682018 @default.
• W2098752968 countsByYear W20987529682019 @default.
• W2098752968 countsByYear W20987529682020 @default.
• W2098752968 countsByYear W20987529682021 @default.
• W2098752968 countsByYear W20987529682022 @default.
• W2098752968 countsByYear W20987529682023 @default.
• W2098752968 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2098752968 hasAuthorship W2098752968A5000688612 @default.
• W2098752968 hasAuthorship W2098752968A5037710040 @default.
• W2098752968 hasAuthorship W2098752968A5053425477 @default.
• W2098752968 hasAuthorship W2098752968A5069035614 @default.
• W2098752968 hasAuthorship W2098752968A5071210488 @default.
• W2098752968 hasAuthorship W2098752968A5082823961 @default.
• W2098752968 hasAuthorship W2098752968A5085063339 @default.
• W2098752968 hasBestOaLocation W20987529681 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C18823058 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C2775924586 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C2776117191 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C2776270601 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C2777343196 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C2778220009 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C2780647465 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C121608353 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C126322002 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C131872663 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C142724271 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C18823058 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C2775924586 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C2776117191 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C2776270601 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C2777343196 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C2778220009 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C2780647465 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C2908647359 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C29456083 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C71924100 @default.
• W2098752968 hasConceptScore W2098752968C99454951 @default.
• W2098752968 hasIssue "23" @default.
• W2098752968 hasLocation W20987529681 @default.
• W2098752968 hasLocation W20987529682 @default.
• W2098752968 hasOpenAccess W2098752968 @default.

• next