FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2098812662> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2098812662 endingPage "581" @default.
• W2098812662 startingPage "577" @default.
• W2098812662 abstract "The purpose of this study was to quantify treatment outcomes of endodontically treated teeth, in a representative, population-based adult sample. The “Florida Dental Care Study” was a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study of 873 subjects who had at least one tooth at baseline and who were 45 yr or older. An in-person interview and clinical examination were conducted at baseline, 24 months, and 48 months after baseline, with 6-monthly telephone interviews between those times. Dental record information was abstracted afterward. Seventy-five teeth had conventional root-canal therapy (RCT) performed and met the inclusion criteria of 1-yr of follow-up or extraction. The mean duration of follow-up after RCT was 24.8 months. The mean (SD) attachment loss (AL) on teeth receiving RCT was only 3.3 (1.4) mm. Permanent restorations were placed in 79% of teeth a mean of 4.4 months after the RCT. However, 12% of teeth did not have any restorative treatment after RCT. After RCT had been completed, 81% of teeth were retained and 19% were ultimately extracted. Taken as a whole, this community-based study of a representative sample of adults suggests a higher failure rate than reported from studies in highly controlled environments or insured populations. It also suggests that the length of time to initial restoration of RCT-treated teeth is less than optimal. RCT was almost never performed on teeth with advanced periodontal attachment loss. The purpose of this study was to quantify treatment outcomes of endodontically treated teeth, in a representative, population-based adult sample. The “Florida Dental Care Study” was a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study of 873 subjects who had at least one tooth at baseline and who were 45 yr or older. An in-person interview and clinical examination were conducted at baseline, 24 months, and 48 months after baseline, with 6-monthly telephone interviews between those times. Dental record information was abstracted afterward. Seventy-five teeth had conventional root-canal therapy (RCT) performed and met the inclusion criteria of 1-yr of follow-up or extraction. The mean duration of follow-up after RCT was 24.8 months. The mean (SD) attachment loss (AL) on teeth receiving RCT was only 3.3 (1.4) mm. Permanent restorations were placed in 79% of teeth a mean of 4.4 months after the RCT. However, 12% of teeth did not have any restorative treatment after RCT. After RCT had been completed, 81% of teeth were retained and 19% were ultimately extracted. Taken as a whole, this community-based study of a representative sample of adults suggests a higher failure rate than reported from studies in highly controlled environments or insured populations. It also suggests that the length of time to initial restoration of RCT-treated teeth is less than optimal. RCT was almost never performed on teeth with advanced periodontal attachment loss." @default.
• W2098812662 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2098812662 creator A5024061355 @default.
• W2098812662 creator A5028065855 @default.
• W2098812662 creator A5036233525 @default.
• W2098812662 creator A5041795778 @default.
• W2098812662 date "2004-08-01" @default.
• W2098812662 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2098812662 title "Root Canal Treatment in a Population-Based Adult Sample: Status of Teeth After Endodontic Treatment" @default.
• W2098812662 cites W1599204129 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W1966793009 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W1967783768 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W1976314696 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W1986706769 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W1993698783 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W1995287276 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W1995867241 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2002746180 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2005546152 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2018964860 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2038357859 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2044768958 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2060476637 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2077208447 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2084451243 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2094168324 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2101232688 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2110754128 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2116464414 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2118300749 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2119523778 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2130398152 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2154767875 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2165446168 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2169428743 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W2315701197 @default.
• W2098812662 cites W4237787297 @default.
• W2098812662 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000125874.80753.f3" @default.
• W2098812662 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15273639" @default.
• W2098812662 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2098812662 type Work @default.
• W2098812662 sameAs 2098812662 @default.
• W2098812662 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2098812662 countsByYear W20988126622012 @default.
• W2098812662 countsByYear W20988126622014 @default.
• W2098812662 countsByYear W20988126622017 @default.
• W2098812662 countsByYear W20988126622020 @default.
• W2098812662 countsByYear W20988126622022 @default.
• W2098812662 countsByYear W20988126622023 @default.
• W2098812662 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2098812662 hasAuthorship W2098812662A5024061355 @default.
• W2098812662 hasAuthorship W2098812662A5028065855 @default.
• W2098812662 hasAuthorship W2098812662A5036233525 @default.
• W2098812662 hasAuthorship W2098812662A5041795778 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConcept C2776594236 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConcept C2779747767 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConcept C2779847468 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConceptScore W2098812662C141071460 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConceptScore W2098812662C168563851 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConceptScore W2098812662C199343813 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConceptScore W2098812662C2776594236 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConceptScore W2098812662C2779747767 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConceptScore W2098812662C2779847468 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConceptScore W2098812662C2908647359 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConceptScore W2098812662C29694066 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConceptScore W2098812662C71924100 @default.
• W2098812662 hasConceptScore W2098812662C99454951 @default.
• W2098812662 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2098812662 hasLocation W20988126621 @default.
• W2098812662 hasLocation W20988126622 @default.
• W2098812662 hasOpenAccess W2098812662 @default.
• W2098812662 hasPrimaryLocation W20988126621 @default.
• W2098812662 hasRelatedWork W1909207236 @default.
• W2098812662 hasRelatedWork W2093083562 @default.
• W2098812662 hasRelatedWork W2098812662 @default.
• W2098812662 hasRelatedWork W2360156195 @default.
• W2098812662 hasRelatedWork W2390860674 @default.
• W2098812662 hasRelatedWork W2580224516 @default.
• W2098812662 hasRelatedWork W3003121164 @default.
• W2098812662 hasRelatedWork W3216714807 @default.
• W2098812662 hasRelatedWork W4285602183 @default.
• W2098812662 hasRelatedWork W3118436270 @default.
• W2098812662 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W2098812662 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2098812662 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2098812662 magId "2098812662" @default.
• W2098812662 workType "article" @default.