FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2098875723> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2098875723 abstract "This paper examines the effects of joint development programmes, like air-rights leasing, on local land markets as well as the cash flows of transit operators. Joint development takes place because both the public and private sectors recognize the potential financial rewards of coordinating projects. A variety of urban rail-related joint development programmes exist across the U.S., with around two-fifths involving forms of cost-sharing (e.g., sharing construction expenses) and about one-fifth involving revenue-sharing (mostly transit property leases and station connection fees). A healthy regional economy and conducive local land use regulations are important precursors to negotiating formal joint development agreements. To date, joint development cost-savings have comprised less than 1% of most U.S. transit properties' total capital expenditures. New York City's MTA has experienced cost savings of over $62 million, constituting about 4% of the agency's total capital outlays since 1984. Leasing revenues make up less than 1% of most rail systems' annual operating budgets. Among U.S. cities with rail systems, Washington, D.C. and Atlanta have been most successful at leasing station-area property and air-rights. Using data across five Washington, D.C. and Atlanta transit stations with joint development projects, this paper examines how transit investments in general and joint development in particular affected various indicators of office market performance. Average office rents near stations were found to increase with systemwide ridership; joint development projects added more than a $3 premium to office rents, controlling for other factors. Moreover, office vacancy rates were lower, average buildings were bigger, and shares of regional office growth were larger in station areas and when joint development projects were generating income. Overall, where regional market conditions are favorable, such as those found in the Washington, D.C. and Atlanta areas during much of the 1980s, rail transit appears capable of enhancing station area commercial real estate markets. Combining transit investments with private real estate projects through joint development ventures appears to further increase these benefits. Given the current saturation of most office markets in U.S. cities, a significant policy challenge for the 1990s will be to apply joint development to residential projects. This would not only enhance revenues," @default.
• W2098875723 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2098875723 creator A5025061454 @default.
• W2098875723 date "1992-01-01" @default.
• W2098875723 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2098875723 title "Land Market Impacts of Urban Rail Transit and Joint Development: An Empirical Study of Rail Transit in Washington, D.C. and Atlanta" @default.
• W2098875723 cites W1587257181 @default.
• W2098875723 cites W1608637384 @default.
• W2098875723 cites W622890259 @default.
• W2098875723 cites W644692746 @default.
• W2098875723 hasPublicationYear "1992" @default.
• W2098875723 type Work @default.
• W2098875723 sameAs 2098875723 @default.
• W2098875723 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2098875723 countsByYear W20988757232021 @default.
• W2098875723 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2098875723 hasAuthorship W2098875723A5025061454 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConcept C106866004 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConcept C158739034 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConcept C195487862 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConcept C2778037673 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConceptScore W2098875723C10138342 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConceptScore W2098875723C106866004 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConceptScore W2098875723C144133560 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConceptScore W2098875723C158739034 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConceptScore W2098875723C162324750 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConceptScore W2098875723C166957645 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConceptScore W2098875723C175444787 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConceptScore W2098875723C195487862 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConceptScore W2098875723C205649164 @default.
• W2098875723 hasConceptScore W2098875723C2778037673 @default.
• W2098875723 hasLocation W20988757231 @default.
• W2098875723 hasOpenAccess W2098875723 @default.
• W2098875723 hasPrimaryLocation W20988757231 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W1481553005 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W1539726633 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W1555335963 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W2023695732 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W2106716482 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W2263667634 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W246220895 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W2902668555 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W3121764903 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W3122576139 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W561935522 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W567036889 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W590778613 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W60707664 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W615018122 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W617148215 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W632650302 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W642417449 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W651343041 @default.
• W2098875723 hasRelatedWork W653114832 @default.
• W2098875723 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2098875723 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2098875723 magId "2098875723" @default.
• W2098875723 workType "article" @default.