FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2098879771> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2098879771 endingPage "194" @default.
• W2098879771 startingPage "180" @default.
• W2098879771 abstract "Large amounts of online reviews, the valuable voice of the customer, benefit consumers and product designers. Identifying and analyzing helpful reviews efficiently and accurately to satisfy both current and potential customers’ needs have become a critical challenge for market-driven product design. Existing evaluation methods only use the review voting ratios given by customers to measure helpfulness. Due to the issues such as viewpoints of interest, technical proficiency and domain knowledge involved, it may mislead designers in identifying those truly valuable and insightful opinions from designers’ perspective. Thus, in this study, we initiate our work to explore a possible approach that bridges the opinions expressed by consumers and the understanding gathered by designers in terms of how helpful these opinions are. Our ultimate research focus is on how to automatically evaluate the helpfulness of an online review from a designer’s viewpoint entirely based on the review content itself. We start our work by first conducting an exploratory study to understand the fundamental question of what makes an online customer review helpful from product designers’ viewpoint. Through our study, we propose four categories of features that reflect designers’ concerns in judging review helpfulness. Based on our experiments, it reveals that discrepancy does exist between both online customer voting and designers’ rating. Furthermore, for the cases where review ratings are not steadily available, we have proposed to use regression to predict and interpret review helpfulness with the help of the aforementioned four categories of features that are entirely extracted from review content. Finally, using review data crawled from Amazon.com and real ratings given by design personnel, it demonstrates the effectiveness of our proposal and it also suggests that helpful product reviews can be identified from a designer’s angle by automatically analyzing the review content. We argue that the study reported is able to improve designer’s ability in business intelligence processing by offering more targeted customer opinions. It highlights the urgency to uncover sensible user requirements from such quality opinions in our future research." @default.
• W2098879771 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2098879771 creator A5002574451 @default.
• W2098879771 creator A5009804612 @default.
• W2098879771 creator A5029794656 @default.
• W2098879771 creator A5069721547 @default.
• W2098879771 creator A5072080566 @default.
• W2098879771 date "2013-02-01" @default.
• W2098879771 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2098879771 title "Identifying helpful online reviews: A product designer’s perspective" @default.
• W2098879771 cites W1994917534 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W2040416338 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W2066761753 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W2067716074 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W2100765983 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W2111721291 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W2112422413 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W2124612856 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W2129508793 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W2132914604 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W2135231399 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W2160660844 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W2168625136 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W4212883601 @default.
• W2098879771 cites W4232359393 @default.
• W2098879771 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2012.07.008" @default.
• W2098879771 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2098879771 type Work @default.
• W2098879771 sameAs 2098879771 @default.
• W2098879771 citedByCount "131" @default.
• W2098879771 countsByYear W20988797712013 @default.
• W2098879771 countsByYear W20988797712014 @default.
• W2098879771 countsByYear W20988797712015 @default.
• W2098879771 countsByYear W20988797712016 @default.
• W2098879771 countsByYear W20988797712017 @default.
• W2098879771 countsByYear W20988797712018 @default.
• W2098879771 countsByYear W20988797712019 @default.
• W2098879771 countsByYear W20988797712020 @default.
• W2098879771 countsByYear W20988797712021 @default.
• W2098879771 countsByYear W20988797712022 @default.
• W2098879771 countsByYear W20988797712023 @default.
• W2098879771 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2098879771 hasAuthorship W2098879771A5002574451 @default.
• W2098879771 hasAuthorship W2098879771A5009804612 @default.
• W2098879771 hasAuthorship W2098879771A5029794656 @default.
• W2098879771 hasAuthorship W2098879771A5069721547 @default.
• W2098879771 hasAuthorship W2098879771A5072080566 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C2776035091 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C2781265381 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C520049643 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C85973986 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C90673727 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C12713177 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C142362112 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C144024400 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C153349607 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C154945302 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C15744967 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C17744445 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C19165224 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C199539241 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C2522767166 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C2524010 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C2776035091 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C2781265381 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C33923547 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C41008148 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C520049643 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C77805123 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C85973986 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C90673727 @default.
• W2098879771 hasConceptScore W2098879771C94625758 @default.
• W2098879771 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2098879771 hasLocation W20988797711 @default.
• W2098879771 hasOpenAccess W2098879771 @default.
• W2098879771 hasPrimaryLocation W20988797711 @default.
• W2098879771 hasRelatedWork W1596372614 @default.
• W2098879771 hasRelatedWork W2314001870 @default.
• W2098879771 hasRelatedWork W2357575823 @default.
• W2098879771 hasRelatedWork W2593317905 @default.
• W2098879771 hasRelatedWork W2810256691 @default.
• W2098879771 hasRelatedWork W2992643760 @default.
• W2098879771 hasRelatedWork W3007970570 @default.

• next