FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2099245890> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2099245890 endingPage "13" @default.
• W2099245890 startingPage "7" @default.
• W2099245890 abstract "Antenatal screening for syphilis is well established in the United Kingdom. The prevalence of syphilis is now very low, prompting the question as to whether this screening programme is still necessary. This paper aims at identifying possible screening strategy options for the programme and comparing their effectiveness and cost effectiveness.The cost of the screening programme in the United Kingdom was estimated. This was based on the cost of screening tests, treatment, and follow up of infected women and their infants. This information was obtained from laboratories, antenatal clinics, and genitourinary medicine clinics. Epidemiological data from a survey of women treated for syphilis in pregnancy were analysed to identify groups at increased risk of syphilis. Strategic options for the screening programme were then identified. The effectiveness, number needed to treat, and cost effectiveness of these options were compared.Antenatal screening in the United Kingdom detected at least 40 pregnant women who need treatment for syphilis every year. This means that 18602 women are screened for every woman detected who needs treatment for syphilis. The marginal annual cost of this screening programme in the United Kingdom is 672366 pounds sterling. This is equivalent to 90p per woman screened, or 16670 pounds sterling to detect one woman who needs treatment for syphilis. The screening programme could be targeted geographically at pregnant women in the Thames regions. This option has the potential to save 482185 pounds sterling. Other strategic options are to target pregnant women in non-white ethnic groups, or those born outside the United Kingdom. These targeted options would each detect between 70% and 77% of women needing treatment for syphilis. These options could potentially save 592938 pounds sterling and 562691 pounds sterling respectively.Targeting or stopping the screening programme would save relatively little money. Although selectively screening groups by country of birth or by ethnic group could detect at least 70% of cases, this would be politically and practically difficult. Targeting by region would facts and the changing international epidemiology of syphilis lead us to recommend that the current universal antenatal screening for syphilis should continue." @default.
• W2099245890 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2099245890 creator A5030590711 @default.
• W2099245890 creator A5068618928 @default.
• W2099245890 creator A5069897062 @default.
• W2099245890 date "2000-03-01" @default.
• W2099245890 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2099245890 title "Strategic options for antenatal screening for syphilis in the United Kingdom: a cost effectiveness analysis" @default.
• W2099245890 cites W1967840552 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W1974489373 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W1985516135 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W1997887907 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W1999569706 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W2005128192 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W2005664283 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W2018163055 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W2027164115 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W2078801573 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W2089132436 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W2091294673 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W2110100841 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W2157084693 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W2391818698 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W2408946959 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W2417688481 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W2418882541 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W6831936 @default.
• W2099245890 cites W425219785 @default.
• W2099245890 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/jms.7.1.7" @default.
• W2099245890 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10807140" @default.
• W2099245890 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2099245890 type Work @default.
• W2099245890 sameAs 2099245890 @default.
• W2099245890 citedByCount "41" @default.
• W2099245890 countsByYear W20992458902012 @default.
• W2099245890 countsByYear W20992458902013 @default.
• W2099245890 countsByYear W20992458902014 @default.
• W2099245890 countsByYear W20992458902015 @default.
• W2099245890 countsByYear W20992458902016 @default.
• W2099245890 countsByYear W20992458902017 @default.
• W2099245890 countsByYear W20992458902020 @default.
• W2099245890 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2099245890 hasAuthorship W2099245890A5030590711 @default.
• W2099245890 hasAuthorship W2099245890A5068618928 @default.
• W2099245890 hasAuthorship W2099245890A5069897062 @default.
• W2099245890 hasBestOaLocation W20992458901 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C137403100 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C2776983459 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C2910401862 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C3013748606 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C112930515 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C137403100 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C144024400 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C187212893 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C19165224 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C2776983459 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C2779234561 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C2910401862 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C29456083 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C3013748606 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C3019080777 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C512399662 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C54355233 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C71924100 @default.
• W2099245890 hasConceptScore W2099245890C86803240 @default.
• W2099245890 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2099245890 hasLocation W20992458901 @default.
• W2099245890 hasLocation W20992458902 @default.
• W2099245890 hasOpenAccess W2099245890 @default.
• W2099245890 hasPrimaryLocation W20992458901 @default.
• W2099245890 hasRelatedWork W2077839924 @default.
• W2099245890 hasRelatedWork W2099245890 @default.
• W2099245890 hasRelatedWork W2334714975 @default.
• W2099245890 hasRelatedWork W2351045413 @default.
• W2099245890 hasRelatedWork W2351336687 @default.
• W2099245890 hasRelatedWork W2353664058 @default.
• W2099245890 hasRelatedWork W2358223642 @default.
• W2099245890 hasRelatedWork W2364924586 @default.
• W2099245890 hasRelatedWork W2405316854 @default.
• W2099245890 hasRelatedWork W2898608713 @default.
• W2099245890 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W2099245890 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2099245890 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2099245890 magId "2099245890" @default.
• W2099245890 workType "article" @default.