Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2099424961> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2099424961 endingPage "406" @default.
- W2099424961 startingPage "400" @default.
- W2099424961 abstract "Summary Reason for performing study: The recovery quality scoring systems (RQSSs) in current use have not been critically reviewed for reliability. Objective: To examine reliability (reproducibility) of 4 RQSSs when applied to a ranked series. Methods: A DVD incorporating the recordings of 9 horses recovering from general anaesthesia was evaluated by final year students over 5 days. On Day 1, each evaluator ranked recoveries from 1–9 (1 = best). Over the following 4 days, each evaluator scored the same recoveries using 4 different RQSSs (3 of them in common usage and previously published) applied in random order. The scores from each RQSS were ranked and plotted against the Day 1 ranking of each evaluator to establish the extent of agreement using generalisability theory. The same 9 recoveries were also ranked by 12 experienced equine anaesthetists and the Spearman Rank Correlation coefficient calculated to determine the agreement between experienced and inexperienced evaluators. Results: The recoveries were evaluated by 117 students. All 4 RQSSs were equally reliable with low (<4%) interobserver variability. The main (80%) source of total variation arose from differences between horses. The overall ranking within each RQSS was strongly correlated with Day 1 ranking. There was strong correlation (r = 0.983) between the students' ranking and that established by experienced anaesthetists. Interobserver reliability was similar with all 4 RQSSs. Conclusion: All 4 RQSSs studied were similarly reliable. Potential relevance: The selection of a universally acceptable RQSS from amongst the 4 examined can be based on criteria other than reliability, e.g. ease of use. This will facilitate wider scale multi‐centre studies in recovery quality after anaesthesia in horses." @default.
- W2099424961 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2099424961 creator A5011994906 @default.
- W2099424961 creator A5018137972 @default.
- W2099424961 creator A5023228013 @default.
- W2099424961 date "2010-06-15" @default.
- W2099424961 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2099424961 title "A comparison of four systems for scoring recovery quality after general anaesthesia in horses" @default.
- W2099424961 cites W1967105122 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W1987495495 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2009629029 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2018850688 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2021697998 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2039139215 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2060525445 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2073652524 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2082588324 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2083075735 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2086082862 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2102765915 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2105313135 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2112515700 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2113313511 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2113431875 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2126785323 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2135327696 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2136218388 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2138295075 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W2139531245 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W3146566578 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W36221249 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W4238804190 @default.
- W2099424961 cites W4293168481 @default.
- W2099424961 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00093.x" @default.
- W2099424961 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20636775" @default.
- W2099424961 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2099424961 type Work @default.
- W2099424961 sameAs 2099424961 @default.
- W2099424961 citedByCount "33" @default.
- W2099424961 countsByYear W20994249612012 @default.
- W2099424961 countsByYear W20994249612013 @default.
- W2099424961 countsByYear W20994249612014 @default.
- W2099424961 countsByYear W20994249612015 @default.
- W2099424961 countsByYear W20994249612016 @default.
- W2099424961 countsByYear W20994249612017 @default.
- W2099424961 countsByYear W20994249612018 @default.
- W2099424961 countsByYear W20994249612020 @default.
- W2099424961 countsByYear W20994249612021 @default.
- W2099424961 countsByYear W20994249612022 @default.
- W2099424961 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2099424961 hasAuthorship W2099424961A5011994906 @default.
- W2099424961 hasAuthorship W2099424961A5018137972 @default.
- W2099424961 hasAuthorship W2099424961A5023228013 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C101601086 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C117220453 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C159744936 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C2780092901 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C101601086 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C105795698 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C117220453 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C119857082 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C121332964 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C159744936 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C163258240 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C189430467 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C2524010 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C2780092901 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C33923547 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C41008148 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C43214815 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C62520636 @default.
- W2099424961 hasConceptScore W2099424961C71924100 @default.
- W2099424961 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2099424961 hasLocation W20994249611 @default.
- W2099424961 hasLocation W20994249612 @default.
- W2099424961 hasOpenAccess W2099424961 @default.
- W2099424961 hasPrimaryLocation W20994249611 @default.
- W2099424961 hasRelatedWork W1996881917 @default.
- W2099424961 hasRelatedWork W2357941858 @default.
- W2099424961 hasRelatedWork W2358850878 @default.
- W2099424961 hasRelatedWork W2360949080 @default.
- W2099424961 hasRelatedWork W2384219337 @default.
- W2099424961 hasRelatedWork W2389190814 @default.
- W2099424961 hasRelatedWork W2562018983 @default.
- W2099424961 hasRelatedWork W3085398489 @default.
- W2099424961 hasRelatedWork W4200439127 @default.
- W2099424961 hasRelatedWork W4232475722 @default.