FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2099450109> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2099450109 endingPage "292" @default.
• W2099450109 startingPage "292" @default.
• W2099450109 abstract "We thank Dr Joan Trujols for his comments on our review. We did indeed briefly raise, but not discuss in detail, one of the key claims made for the socially desirable impacts of the brain disease model of addiction (BDMA), that public acceptance of the BDMA will reduce stigmatisation of addicted persons. Space limitations did not permit us to do so. We agree that there is a paucity of empirical studies of this issue. Dr Trujols cited work we have undertaken on the attitudes of the Australian public towards BDMA that found little enthusiasm and no evidence that acceptance of BDMA reduced stigmatisation stigmatisation.1Meurk C Carter A Partidge B Lucke J Hall W How is acceptance of the brain disease model of addiction related to Australians' attitudes toward addicted individuals and treatments for addiction?.BMC Psychiatry. 2014; 14: 9Crossref PubMed Scopus (33) Google Scholar We agree with Dr Trujols' interpretation of the limited empirical research on the effect of acceptance of neurobiological conceptualizations of psychiatric disorders on stigma.2Kvaale EP Gottdiener WH Haslam N Biogenetic expanations and stigma: a meta-analytic review of associations among laypeople.Soc Sci Med. 2013; 96: 95-103Crossref PubMed Scopus (167) Google Scholar, 3Angermeyer MC Dietrich S Public beliefs about and attitudes towards people with mental illness: a review of population studies.Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006; 113: 163-179Crossref PubMed Scopus (704) Google Scholar, 4Pescosolido BA Martin JK Long JS Medina TR Phelan JC Link BG “A disease like any other”? A decade of change in public relations to schizophrenia, depression, and alcohol dependence.Am J Psychiatry. 2010; 167: 1321-1330Crossref PubMed Scopus (736) Google Scholar Had space permitted our conclusion would have been the same as his, that there is very little evidence to support the view that framing addiction as a brain disease reduces stigma and that proponents need to produce evidence that BDMA will in fact reduce stigma, before highlighting this as a potential benefit. We declare no competing interests. The brain disease model of addiction: challenging or reinforcing stigma?In their critical analysis of the brain disease model of addiction (BDMA), Wayne Hall and colleagues1 have elegantly shown that the BDMA is insufficiently supported by animal-model and neuroimaging evidence; has not contributed to the development of more effective treatments; and has had a modest effect on public policies toward drugs and drug addiction. However, one of the key aspirational claims of advocates for the BDMA is left unaddressed—even though alluded to—by Hall and colleagues:1 the BDMA's potential to undermine the stigmatisation of addiction and people with drug addiction. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W2099450109 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2099450109 creator A5030527783 @default.
• W2099450109 creator A5035498460 @default.
• W2099450109 creator A5053840112 @default.
• W2099450109 date "2015-04-01" @default.
• W2099450109 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2099450109 title "The brain disease model of addiction: challenging or reinforcing stigma?–Authors' reply" @default.
• W2099450109 cites W2015352059 @default.
• W2099450109 cites W2062997109 @default.
• W2099450109 cites W2127148085 @default.
• W2099450109 cites W2130559519 @default.
• W2099450109 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00083-8" @default.
• W2099450109 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26360071" @default.
• W2099450109 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2099450109 type Work @default.
• W2099450109 sameAs 2099450109 @default.
• W2099450109 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2099450109 countsByYear W20994501092016 @default.
• W2099450109 countsByYear W20994501092017 @default.
• W2099450109 countsByYear W20994501092018 @default.
• W2099450109 countsByYear W20994501092022 @default.
• W2099450109 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2099450109 hasAuthorship W2099450109A5030527783 @default.
• W2099450109 hasAuthorship W2099450109A5035498460 @default.
• W2099450109 hasAuthorship W2099450109A5053840112 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C168285401 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C2776674806 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C2781354396 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C2781437451 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C2992895887 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C3013748606 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C48856860 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C118552586 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C134362201 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C142724271 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C15744967 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C168285401 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C17744445 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C199539241 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C2776674806 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C2779134260 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C2779473830 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C2781354396 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C2781437451 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C2908647359 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C2992895887 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C3013748606 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C48856860 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C512399662 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C542102704 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C70410870 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C71924100 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C77805123 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C83867959 @default.
• W2099450109 hasConceptScore W2099450109C99454951 @default.
• W2099450109 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2099450109 hasLocation W20994501091 @default.
• W2099450109 hasLocation W20994501092 @default.
• W2099450109 hasOpenAccess W2099450109 @default.
• W2099450109 hasPrimaryLocation W20994501091 @default.
• W2099450109 hasRelatedWork W2003768935 @default.
• W2099450109 hasRelatedWork W2024959857 @default.
• W2099450109 hasRelatedWork W2083235285 @default.
• W2099450109 hasRelatedWork W2099450109 @default.
• W2099450109 hasRelatedWork W2121365993 @default.
• W2099450109 hasRelatedWork W2145155307 @default.
• W2099450109 hasRelatedWork W2396776161 @default.
• W2099450109 hasRelatedWork W2409491543 @default.
• W2099450109 hasRelatedWork W3007623901 @default.
• W2099450109 hasRelatedWork W562588434 @default.
• W2099450109 hasVolume "2" @default.
• W2099450109 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2099450109 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2099450109 magId "2099450109" @default.
• W2099450109 workType "article" @default.