FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2099748512> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2099748512 abstract "To review the effectiveness and/or accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and predictive value of neuroimaging of the cerebral cortex to visualise the seizure focus in people with refractory epilepsy being considered for surgery.Electronic databases, Internet searches, hand searching and consultation with experts.A systematic review was undertaken according to published guidelines. Results of diagnostic accuracy studies were analysed according to the imaging test evaluated. For each study the proportion of patients who were correctly localised, not localised, partially localised or incorrectly localised by the index test was calculated. Due to the heterogeneity present between studies, statistical pooling was not performed. Instead, a narrative synthesis of results is presented. For studies using multivariate analysis to look at the association of neuroimaging findings and outcome following surgery, all factors considered in the analyses were presented. Studies were grouped according to the neuroimaging technique investigated and the findings discussed with reference to possible sources of heterogeneity between studies.No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified, with the majority of studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging techniques in the localisation of epileptic seizure foci. There was significant heterogeneity (p<0.05) between studies for at least one of the localisation categories (correctly localised, not localised, partially localised and incorrectly localised) for all imaging techniques. Possible explanations for this heterogeneity include differing study designs, index test characteristics, reference standards and population characteristics. Test performance was more promising in studies restricted to patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Ictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) generally had more correctly localising (70--100%) and fewer non-localising (0--7%) scans than other techniques evaluated in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Results for computed tomography and interictal SPECT suggest that these tests are relatively poor at localising the seizure focus. Volumeric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and position emission tomography (PET) appear promising, and subtraction ictal single photon emission computed tomography co-registered to magnetic resonance imaging (SISCOM) and magnetic resonance spectrosopy (MRS) less promising than ictal SPECT, but these technologies have been assessed in fewer studies. T2 relaxometry was reported in only one small study with inconclusive results. Seventeen studies (33 evaluations) provided sufficient data on the association of a localised scan with outcome following surgery to calculate a relative risk. The majority of evaluations (24/33) suggested that patients with a correctly or partially localised scan had a better outcome following surgery than those with an incorrectly localised or non-localised scan. However, this association was statistically significant in only three studies, two evaluating routine MRI [(relative risk (RR) 2.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32 to 5.67; RR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.63] and the other SISCOM (RR 2.12, 95% CI: 1.01, 4.44). Nine studies used multivariate analysis to investigate the association of MRI (7 studies), MRS and volumetric MRI (1 study), PET (3 studies), SPECT (1 study) and SISCOM (3 studies) with the outcome following surgery. There was a trend for localisation of abnormalities to be associated with a beneficial outcome.Due to the limitations of the included studies, the results of this review do little to inform clinical practice, with insufficient evidence regarding effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of imaging techniques in the work-up for epilepsy surgery. Given the inadequacy of existing data, there is a pressing need for studies investigating the utility of imaging techniques in the work up for epilepsy surgery. The most reliable method to achieve this is the RCT, which could examine the single tests or combinations of tests on patient outcome. The authors suggest that it is important that clinicians, patient groups, policy makers and healthcare/research funders meet and debate the most appropriate way to investigate these technologies." @default.
• W2099748512 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2099748512 creator A5005069325 @default.
• W2099748512 creator A5033055745 @default.
• W2099748512 creator A5047943091 @default.
• W2099748512 creator A5051011711 @default.
• W2099748512 creator A5054620845 @default.
• W2099748512 creator A5060065683 @default.
• W2099748512 creator A5069841995 @default.
• W2099748512 creator A5070161423 @default.
• W2099748512 creator A5077388783 @default.
• W2099748512 creator A5091600989 @default.
• W2099748512 date "2006-02-01" @default.
• W2099748512 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2099748512 title "A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of neuroimaging assessments used to visualise the seizure focus in people with refractory epilepsy being considered for surgery" @default.
• W2099748512 doi "https://doi.org/10.3310/hta10040" @default.
• W2099748512 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16487454" @default.
• W2099748512 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2099748512 type Work @default.
• W2099748512 sameAs 2099748512 @default.
• W2099748512 citedByCount "73" @default.
• W2099748512 countsByYear W20997485122012 @default.
• W2099748512 countsByYear W20997485122013 @default.
• W2099748512 countsByYear W20997485122014 @default.
• W2099748512 countsByYear W20997485122015 @default.
• W2099748512 countsByYear W20997485122016 @default.
• W2099748512 countsByYear W20997485122018 @default.
• W2099748512 countsByYear W20997485122019 @default.
• W2099748512 countsByYear W20997485122020 @default.
• W2099748512 countsByYear W20997485122021 @default.
• W2099748512 countsByYear W20997485122022 @default.
• W2099748512 countsByYear W20997485122023 @default.
• W2099748512 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2099748512 hasAuthorship W2099748512A5005069325 @default.
• W2099748512 hasAuthorship W2099748512A5033055745 @default.
• W2099748512 hasAuthorship W2099748512A5047943091 @default.
• W2099748512 hasAuthorship W2099748512A5051011711 @default.
• W2099748512 hasAuthorship W2099748512A5054620845 @default.
• W2099748512 hasAuthorship W2099748512A5060065683 @default.
• W2099748512 hasAuthorship W2099748512A5069841995 @default.
• W2099748512 hasAuthorship W2099748512A5070161423 @default.
• W2099748512 hasAuthorship W2099748512A5077388783 @default.
• W2099748512 hasAuthorship W2099748512A5091600989 @default.
• W2099748512 hasBestOaLocation W20997485121 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConcept C119423318 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConcept C2778186239 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConcept C2780803581 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConcept C2781099131 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConcept C58693492 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConceptScore W2099748512C118552586 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConceptScore W2099748512C119423318 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConceptScore W2099748512C141071460 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConceptScore W2099748512C168563851 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConceptScore W2099748512C19527891 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConceptScore W2099748512C2778186239 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConceptScore W2099748512C2780803581 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConceptScore W2099748512C2781099131 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConceptScore W2099748512C2908647359 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConceptScore W2099748512C58693492 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConceptScore W2099748512C71924100 @default.
• W2099748512 hasConceptScore W2099748512C99454951 @default.
• W2099748512 hasFunder F4320334661 @default.
• W2099748512 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2099748512 hasLocation W20997485121 @default.
• W2099748512 hasLocation W20997485122 @default.
• W2099748512 hasOpenAccess W2099748512 @default.
• W2099748512 hasPrimaryLocation W20997485121 @default.
• W2099748512 hasRelatedWork W1978120509 @default.
• W2099748512 hasRelatedWork W2064080063 @default.
• W2099748512 hasRelatedWork W2088349757 @default.
• W2099748512 hasRelatedWork W2105669039 @default.
• W2099748512 hasRelatedWork W2256201004 @default.
• W2099748512 hasRelatedWork W2317495993 @default.
• W2099748512 hasRelatedWork W2398211810 @default.
• W2099748512 hasRelatedWork W3168276156 @default.
• W2099748512 hasRelatedWork W4312306557 @default.
• W2099748512 hasRelatedWork W4362602003 @default.
• W2099748512 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W2099748512 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2099748512 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2099748512 magId "2099748512" @default.
• W2099748512 workType "article" @default.