FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2100332012> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2100332012 abstract "Open source has been championed by many scholars as a superior system for promoting innovation, not only in software but latterly in biology. Though software code and genes appear superficially similar in the sense that they both serve as algorithms for the production of specified results, the former may be more conducive to the open source model of innovation than the latter. Nevertheless, if an open source model of genetics were adopted, the model could have significant effects on the future of human genetic enhancement. If open source genetics were unsuccessful or counterproductive in promoting genetic innovation, the result would be slowed discovery and development of genetic enhancements. Yet, if open source genetics were successful in spurring genetic innovation, at least two results would be likely: (1) acceleration in the rate of innovation in new genetic enhancements, and (2) acceleration of the widespread adoption of genetic enhancements. By contrast, proprietary patent protection for genetic enhancements would tend to spur genetic innovation, but would tend to limit access to those genetic enhancements through discriminatory mechanisms such as price and favoritism. Open source genetics likely would offer different societal outcomes for genetic enhancement than would proprietary patent systems. Furthermore, the societal implications of an open source genetics approach to genetic enhancement likely would not have the simple, salutary effects many in the open biology movement tend to assume. Rather, open source genetics might lead to more widespread genetic enhancement than would proprietary patent approaches, though the potential pool of available genetic enhancements likely would be smaller. A proprietary patent approach would likely ensure high rates of genetic enhancement innovation, research, and development, and efficiently mediate access to genetic enhancements, but likely would allow access to genetic enhancements to fewer members of society. With both open source genetics and proprietary patent approaches, there remains the prospect that genetic enhancement might lead to human evolutionary change. Public policy and the law must grapple with the implications of genetic enhancement before current technological possibilities become societal realities. Open source genetics offers a significant alternative to the prospect of the patent system as a substantial arbiter of parental decisions regarding genetic enhancement of their offspring. Open source genetics holds the potential to democratize accessibility of genetic enhancements, while discouraging high rates of genetic enhancement innovation. However, the implications that open source genetics has for the future of human society - and even human evolution - are not clearly more beneficial than the implications the patent system would have. It is certain that the implications that open source genetics and proprietary patent systems have for future human genetic enhancement should be subjected to thorough analysis and debate prior to the imminent arrival of human genetic enhancement technologies." @default.
• W2100332012 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2100332012 creator A5077012602 @default.
• W2100332012 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W2100332012 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2100332012 title "Open and Proprietary Biological Innovation in Human Genetic Enhancement" @default.
• W2100332012 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2100332012 type Work @default.
• W2100332012 sameAs 2100332012 @default.
• W2100332012 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2100332012 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2100332012 hasAuthorship W2100332012A5077012602 @default.
• W2100332012 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2100332012 hasConcept C2777904410 @default.
• W2100332012 hasConcept C3018397939 @default.
• W2100332012 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2100332012 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2100332012 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2100332012 hasConceptScore W2100332012C199360897 @default.
• W2100332012 hasConceptScore W2100332012C2777904410 @default.
• W2100332012 hasConceptScore W2100332012C3018397939 @default.
• W2100332012 hasConceptScore W2100332012C41008148 @default.
• W2100332012 hasConceptScore W2100332012C54355233 @default.
• W2100332012 hasConceptScore W2100332012C86803240 @default.
• W2100332012 hasLocation W21003320121 @default.
• W2100332012 hasOpenAccess W2100332012 @default.
• W2100332012 hasPrimaryLocation W21003320121 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W113845861 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W157010831 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W1779833232 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W1845196070 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W1978625086 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W2061464073 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W2088003614 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W2108424050 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W2110227005 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W2149655112 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W2310085456 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W2471765234 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W2617610281 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W2764122811 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W2779452017 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W2996577392 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W3111418797 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W3125622729 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W3126122727 @default.
• W2100332012 hasRelatedWork W3203633459 @default.
• W2100332012 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2100332012 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2100332012 magId "2100332012" @default.
• W2100332012 workType "article" @default.