Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2100565988> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2100565988 endingPage "3240" @default.
- W2100565988 startingPage "3227" @default.
- W2100565988 abstract "Artificial hip joints are used in only one hip for about 85 per cent of the patients and in both hips (bilateral) for about 15 per cent of the patients. The occurrence of bilateral prostheses and the influence they have in survival analyses of joint arthroplasties are seldom considered. In this study we therefore focus on issues related to bilateral primary hip prostheses, time to revision surgery, and some commonly used statistical methods. We used information from 47 355 patients with 55 782 primary hip prostheses reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 1987 and 2000. Due to the large number of diagnoses, fixation techniques for the prostheses, and combination of prostheses brands, we furthermore considered a ‘homogeneous’ subset of 8703 prostheses from 7930 patients with primary osteoarthritis, and Charnley prosthesis fixed with antibiotic-containing Palacos cement. Kaplan–Meier curves for all prostheses, ignoring that some patients have bilateral prostheses, were compared with Kaplan–Meier curves using only the first inserted prostheses, and with survival curves modified for patients with bilateral prostheses. Cox regression analyses were used to assess explanatory variables and to adjust for confounding factors. The results from the ordinary Cox regression analyses were compared with results from a marginal model, a shared gamma frailty model, and a model using a time dependent covariate to condition on failures in the opposite hip. We found no practical difference between the three calculated survival curves for the hip replacement data. The ordinary Cox-model and the marginal model gave equivalent results. In the shared gamma frailty model estimates for the risk factors were comparable with the former two approaches. The estimated frailty variance was higher when all data were used, even after adjustment for confounding factors. For the ‘homogeneous’ data the estimated frailty variance was negligible. Using a time dependent covariate to condition on previous revisions in the opposite hip, we found a higher risk of revision for the remaining primary hip prosthesis if the opposite hip had been revised (RR=3.49, p<0.0001). There was no difference in risk for revision between right and left hip prostheses. If the time interval between the two primary operations was more than two years, for the full data, the first hip prosthesis had an increased risk of revision compared to prostheses in patients with only one prosthesis (RR=1.25, p=0.01). For the ‘homogeneous’ data no statistically significant difference was found between unilateral and bilateral prostheses. A revision in one hip, for patients with bilateral prostheses, is a risk factor for revision of the other hip. Thus, in analyses of prostheses survival, dependencies between two hip prostheses from one patient should be considered. However, ignoring possible dependencies does not necessarily have an impact on the results on standard risk factors. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd." @default.
- W2100565988 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2100565988 creator A5048226550 @default.
- W2100565988 creator A5058391855 @default.
- W2100565988 creator A5060575671 @default.
- W2100565988 creator A5061138918 @default.
- W2100565988 creator A5070613322 @default.
- W2100565988 date "2004-01-01" @default.
- W2100565988 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W2100565988 title "Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55 782 primary hip replacements from 47 355 patients" @default.
- W2100565988 cites W133235030 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W1570622790 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W1593493925 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W1964449287 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W1971211622 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W1978795821 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W1991017634 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2004376881 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2066012189 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2068231614 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2086980623 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2092648747 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2094553388 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2125953759 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2129530396 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2145072709 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2155666448 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2157367015 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2167001093 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2240848445 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2295636849 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2416539011 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W4229817929 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W4302952347 @default.
- W2100565988 cites W2105836661 @default.
- W2100565988 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1905" @default.
- W2100565988 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15449328" @default.
- W2100565988 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W2100565988 type Work @default.
- W2100565988 sameAs 2100565988 @default.
- W2100565988 citedByCount "96" @default.
- W2100565988 countsByYear W21005659882012 @default.
- W2100565988 countsByYear W21005659882013 @default.
- W2100565988 countsByYear W21005659882014 @default.
- W2100565988 countsByYear W21005659882015 @default.
- W2100565988 countsByYear W21005659882016 @default.
- W2100565988 countsByYear W21005659882017 @default.
- W2100565988 countsByYear W21005659882018 @default.
- W2100565988 countsByYear W21005659882019 @default.
- W2100565988 countsByYear W21005659882020 @default.
- W2100565988 countsByYear W21005659882021 @default.
- W2100565988 countsByYear W21005659882022 @default.
- W2100565988 countsByYear W21005659882023 @default.
- W2100565988 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2100565988 hasAuthorship W2100565988A5048226550 @default.
- W2100565988 hasAuthorship W2100565988A5058391855 @default.
- W2100565988 hasAuthorship W2100565988A5060575671 @default.
- W2100565988 hasAuthorship W2100565988A5061138918 @default.
- W2100565988 hasAuthorship W2100565988A5070613322 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C10515644 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C119043178 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C152877465 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C197656967 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C26831200 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C2776348710 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C2778715743 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C50382708 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConcept C77350462 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C10515644 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C105795698 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C119043178 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C126322002 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C141071460 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C142724271 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C152877465 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C197656967 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C204787440 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C26831200 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C2776164576 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C2776348710 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C2778336525 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C2778715743 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C33923547 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C50382708 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C71924100 @default.
- W2100565988 hasConceptScore W2100565988C77350462 @default.
- W2100565988 hasIssue "20" @default.
- W2100565988 hasLocation W21005659881 @default.
- W2100565988 hasLocation W21005659882 @default.