FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2100793044> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2100793044 endingPage "184" @default.
• W2100793044 startingPage "171" @default.
• W2100793044 abstract "Abstract Routine determination of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) is performed in numerous laboratories around the world using one of three families of methods: UV oxidation (UV), persulfate oxidation (PO), or high temperature combustion (HTC). Essentially all routine methods measure total dissolved nitrogen (TDN) and calculate DON by subtracting the dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN). While there is currently no strong suggestion that any of these methods is inadequate, there are continuing suspicions of slight inaccuracy by UV methods. This is a report of a broad community methods comparison where 29 sets (7 UV, 13 PO, and 9 HTC) of TDN analyses were performed on five samples with varying TDN and DIN concentrations. Analyses were done in a “blind” procedure with results sent to the first author. With editing out one set of extreme outliers (representing 5 out of 145 ampoules analyzed), the community comparability for analyzing the TDN samples was in the 8–28% range (coefficient of variation representing one standard deviation for the five individual samples by 28 analyses). When DIN concentrations were subtracted uniformly (single DIN value for each sample), the comparability was obviously worse (19–46% cv). This comparison represents a larger and more diverse set of analyses, but the overall comparability is only marginally better than that of the Seattle workshop of a decade ago. Grouping methods, little difference was seen other than inconclusive evidence that the UV methods gave TDN values for several of the samples higher than HTC methods. Since there was much scatter for each of the groups of methods and for all analyses when grouped, it is thought that more uniformity in procedures is probably needed. An important unplanned observation is that variability in DIN analyses (used in determining the final analyte in most UV and PO methods) is essentially as large as the variability in the TDN analyses. This exercise should not be viewed as a qualification exercise for the analysts, but should instead be considered a broad preliminary test of the comparison of the families of methods being used in various laboratories around the world. Based on many independent analyses here, none of the routinely used methods appears to be grossly inaccurate, thus, most routine TDN analyses being reported in the literature are apparently accurate. However, it is not reassuring that the ability of the international community to determine DON in deep oceanic waters continues to be poor. It is suggested that as an outgrowth of this paper, analysts using UV and PO methods experiment and look more carefully at the completeness of DIN conversion to the final analyte and also at the accuracy of their analysis of the final analyte. HTC methods appear to be relatively easy and convenient and have potential for routine adoption. Several of the authors of this paper are currently working together on an interlaboratory comparison on HTC methodology." @default.
• W2100793044 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5005956830 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5007065505 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5010156641 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5010496147 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5013187798 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5017815624 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5018546329 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5024029939 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5027608231 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5029580927 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5032746776 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5033559642 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5034346646 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5040943944 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5042032867 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5042345855 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5050153164 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5051392595 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5054763001 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5058797144 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5061517394 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5062242357 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5065228762 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5072203346 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5078090419 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5083871456 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5086535548 @default.
• W2100793044 creator A5087578121 @default.
• W2100793044 date "2002-06-01" @default.
• W2100793044 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2100793044 title "A preliminary methods comparison for measurement of dissolved organic nitrogen in seawater" @default.
• W2100793044 cites W1540367430 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W1966596209 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W1979670989 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W1996513601 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2004570116 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2010279255 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2019617366 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2020977186 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2033942831 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2038520314 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2042508300 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2045699999 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2060358015 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2062853634 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2070065964 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2070390192 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2073678840 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2077635771 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2083765911 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2090848603 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2091355073 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2095345494 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2117214178 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2131956565 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2147591350 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2317913270 @default.
• W2100793044 cites W2465825860 @default.
• W2100793044 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4203(02)00020-8" @default.
• W2100793044 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2100793044 type Work @default.
• W2100793044 sameAs 2100793044 @default.
• W2100793044 citedByCount "89" @default.
• W2100793044 countsByYear W21007930442012 @default.
• W2100793044 countsByYear W21007930442013 @default.
• W2100793044 countsByYear W21007930442014 @default.
• W2100793044 countsByYear W21007930442015 @default.
• W2100793044 countsByYear W21007930442016 @default.
• W2100793044 countsByYear W21007930442017 @default.
• W2100793044 countsByYear W21007930442018 @default.
• W2100793044 countsByYear W21007930442019 @default.
• W2100793044 countsByYear W21007930442020 @default.
• W2100793044 countsByYear W21007930442021 @default.
• W2100793044 countsByYear W21007930442022 @default.
• W2100793044 countsByYear W21007930442023 @default.
• W2100793044 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5005956830 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5007065505 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5010156641 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5010496147 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5013187798 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5017815624 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5018546329 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5024029939 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5027608231 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5029580927 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5032746776 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5033559642 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5034346646 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5040943944 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5042032867 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5042345855 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5050153164 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5051392595 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5054763001 @default.
• W2100793044 hasAuthorship W2100793044A5058797144 @default.

• next