Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2100858319> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2100858319 endingPage "73" @default.
- W2100858319 startingPage "63" @default.
- W2100858319 abstract "ObjectivesUltrasound velocity criteria for the diagnosis of in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) are not well established. In the present study, we test whether ultrasound velocity measurements correlate with increasing degrees of in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing CAS and develop customized velocity criteria to identify residual stenosis ≥20%, in-stent restenosis ≥50%, and high-grade in-stent restenosis ≥80%.MethodsCarotid angiograms performed at the completion of CAS were compared with duplex ultrasound (DUS) imaging performed immediately after the procedure. Patients were followed up with annual DUS imaging and underwent both ultrasound scans and computed tomography angiography (CTA) at their most recent follow-up visit. Patients with suspected high-grade in-stent restenosis on DUS imaging underwent diagnostic carotid angiograms. DUS findings were therefore available for comparison with luminal stenosis measured by carotid angiograms or CTA in all these patients. The DUS protocol included peak-systolic (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) measurements in the native common carotid artery (CCA), proximal stent, mid stent, distal stent, and distal internal carotid artery (ICA).ResultsOf 255 CAS procedures that were reviewed, 39 had contralateral ICA stenosis and were excluded from the study. During a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 1 to 10 years), 23 patients died and 64 were lost. Available for analysis were 189 pairs of ultrasound and procedural carotid angiogram measurements; 99 pairs of ultrasound and CTA measurements during routine follow-up; and 29 pairs of ultrasound and carotid angiograms measurements during follow-up for suspected high-grade in-stent restenosis ≥80% (n = 310 pairs of observations, ultrasound vs carotid angiograms/CTA). The accuracy of CTA vs carotid angiograms was confirmed (r2 = 0.88) in a subset of 19 patients. Post-CAS PSV (r2 = .85) and ICA/CCA ratios (r2 = 0.76) correlated most with the degree of stenosis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated the following optimal threshold criteria: residual stenosis ≥20% (PSV ≥150 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio ≥2.15), in-stent restenosis ≥50% (PSV ≥220 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio ≥2.7), and in-stent restenosis ≥80% (PSV 340 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio ≥4.15).ConclusionsProgressively increasing PSV and ICA/CCA ratios correlate with evolving restenosis within the stented carotid artery. Ultrasound velocity criteria developed for native arteries overestimate the degree of in-stent restenosis encountered. These changes persist during long-term follow-up and across all grades of in-stent restenosis after CAS. The proposed new velocity criteria accurately define residual stenosis ≥20%, in-stent restenosis ≥50%, and high-grade in-stent restenosis ≥80% in the stented carotid artery. Ultrasound velocity criteria for the diagnosis of in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) are not well established. In the present study, we test whether ultrasound velocity measurements correlate with increasing degrees of in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing CAS and develop customized velocity criteria to identify residual stenosis ≥20%, in-stent restenosis ≥50%, and high-grade in-stent restenosis ≥80%. Carotid angiograms performed at the completion of CAS were compared with duplex ultrasound (DUS) imaging performed immediately after the procedure. Patients were followed up with annual DUS imaging and underwent both ultrasound scans and computed tomography angiography (CTA) at their most recent follow-up visit. Patients with suspected high-grade in-stent restenosis on DUS imaging underwent diagnostic carotid angiograms. DUS findings were therefore available for comparison with luminal stenosis measured by carotid angiograms or CTA in all these patients. The DUS protocol included peak-systolic (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) measurements in the native common carotid artery (CCA), proximal stent, mid stent, distal stent, and distal internal carotid artery (ICA). Of 255 CAS procedures that were reviewed, 39 had contralateral ICA stenosis and were excluded from the study. During a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 1 to 10 years), 23 patients died and 64 were lost. Available for analysis were 189 pairs of ultrasound and procedural carotid angiogram measurements; 99 pairs of ultrasound and CTA measurements during routine follow-up; and 29 pairs of ultrasound and carotid angiograms measurements during follow-up for suspected high-grade in-stent restenosis ≥80% (n = 310 pairs of observations, ultrasound vs carotid angiograms/CTA). The accuracy of CTA vs carotid angiograms was confirmed (r2 = 0.88) in a subset of 19 patients. Post-CAS PSV (r2 = .85) and ICA/CCA ratios (r2 = 0.76) correlated most with the degree of stenosis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated the following optimal threshold criteria: residual stenosis ≥20% (PSV ≥150 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio ≥2.15), in-stent restenosis ≥50% (PSV ≥220 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio ≥2.7), and in-stent restenosis ≥80% (PSV 340 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio ≥4.15). Progressively increasing PSV and ICA/CCA ratios correlate with evolving restenosis within the stented carotid artery. Ultrasound velocity criteria developed for native arteries overestimate the degree of in-stent restenosis encountered. These changes persist during long-term follow-up and across all grades of in-stent restenosis after CAS. The proposed new velocity criteria accurately define residual stenosis ≥20%, in-stent restenosis ≥50%, and high-grade in-stent restenosis ≥80% in the stented carotid artery." @default.
- W2100858319 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2100858319 creator A5008700930 @default.
- W2100858319 creator A5010379011 @default.
- W2100858319 creator A5040412256 @default.
- W2100858319 creator A5042879306 @default.
- W2100858319 creator A5071630432 @default.
- W2100858319 creator A5079820098 @default.
- W2100858319 date "2008-01-01" @default.
- W2100858319 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W2100858319 title "Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery" @default.
- W2100858319 cites W1970653958 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W1973352840 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W1978030089 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W1981126219 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W1981614002 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2000610860 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2002101225 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2004770080 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2011668363 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2024575248 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2028664833 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2036435465 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2038169486 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2047318336 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2055721340 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2072731609 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2072881541 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2084856957 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2090480732 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2091789730 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2091984611 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2103742048 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2123898975 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2126255354 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2129417841 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2131625367 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2134158767 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2141203684 @default.
- W2100858319 cites W2767911074 @default.
- W2100858319 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.038" @default.
- W2100858319 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18178455" @default.
- W2100858319 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W2100858319 type Work @default.
- W2100858319 sameAs 2100858319 @default.
- W2100858319 citedByCount "170" @default.
- W2100858319 countsByYear W21008583192012 @default.
- W2100858319 countsByYear W21008583192013 @default.
- W2100858319 countsByYear W21008583192014 @default.
- W2100858319 countsByYear W21008583192015 @default.
- W2100858319 countsByYear W21008583192016 @default.
- W2100858319 countsByYear W21008583192017 @default.
- W2100858319 countsByYear W21008583192018 @default.
- W2100858319 countsByYear W21008583192019 @default.
- W2100858319 countsByYear W21008583192020 @default.
- W2100858319 countsByYear W21008583192021 @default.
- W2100858319 countsByYear W21008583192022 @default.
- W2100858319 countsByYear W21008583192023 @default.
- W2100858319 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2100858319 hasAuthorship W2100858319A5008700930 @default.
- W2100858319 hasAuthorship W2100858319A5010379011 @default.
- W2100858319 hasAuthorship W2100858319A5040412256 @default.
- W2100858319 hasAuthorship W2100858319A5042879306 @default.
- W2100858319 hasAuthorship W2100858319A5071630432 @default.
- W2100858319 hasAuthorship W2100858319A5079820098 @default.
- W2100858319 hasBestOaLocation W21008583191 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C2778283817 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C2778333808 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C2779169563 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C2780643987 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C2781064879 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C2781068581 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C2781347138 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C2987047532 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C552990157 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConcept C99611785 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C126838900 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C143753070 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C164705383 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C2778283817 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C2778333808 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C2778583881 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C2779169563 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C2780007028 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C2780643987 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C2781064879 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C2781068581 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C2781347138 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C2987047532 @default.
- W2100858319 hasConceptScore W2100858319C54355233 @default.