FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2101178490> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2101178490 endingPage "e113" @default.
• W2101178490 startingPage "e113" @default.
• W2101178490 abstract "During the last 5 years, an ethical debate has emerged, often in public media, about the potential positive and negative effects of physician rating sites and whether physician rating sites created by insurance companies or government agencies are ethical in their current states. Due to the lack of direct evidence of physician rating sites’ effects on physicians’ performance, patient outcomes, or the public’s trust in health care, most contributions refer to normative arguments, hypothetical effects, or indirect evidence. This paper aims, first, to structure the ethical debate about the basic concept of physician rating sites: allowing patients to rate, comment, and discuss physicians’ performance, online and visible to everyone. Thus, it provides a more thorough and transparent starting point for further discussion and decision making on physician rating sites: what should physicians and health policy decision makers take into account when discussing the basic concept of physician rating sites and its possible implications on the physician–patient relationship? Second, it discusses where and how the preexisting evidence from the partly related field of public reporting of physician performance can serve as an indicator for specific needs of evaluative research in the field of physician rating sites. This paper defines the ethical principles of patient welfare, patient autonomy, physician welfare, and social justice in the context of physician rating sites. It also outlines basic conditions for a fair decision-making process concerning the implementation and regulation of physician rating sites, namely, transparency, justification, participation, minimization of conflicts of interest, and openness for revision. Besides other issues described in this paper, one trade-off presents a special challenge and will play an important role when deciding about more- or less-restrictive physician rating sites regulations: the potential psychological and financial harms for physicians that can result from physician rating sites need to be contained without limiting the potential benefits for patients with respect to health, health literacy, and equity." @default.
• W2101178490 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2101178490 creator A5082173751 @default.
• W2101178490 date "2011-12-06" @default.
• W2101178490 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2101178490 title "Ethical Principles for Physician Rating Sites" @default.
• W2101178490 cites W1513172526 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W1978042049 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W1984093211 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W1985455827 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W1990376708 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W1992157430 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W1994499814 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W1999912876 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2008466159 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2022096170 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2031137530 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2041496366 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2044805863 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2050446316 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2050545314 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2052103799 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2052740487 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2071943008 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2077373238 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2080271974 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2085519191 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2091908703 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2092582371 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2097943597 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2113380309 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2129716887 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2143805299 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2304731190 @default.
• W2101178490 cites W2463156625 @default.
• W2101178490 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1899" @default.
• W2101178490 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3278099" @default.
• W2101178490 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22146737" @default.
• W2101178490 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2101178490 type Work @default.
• W2101178490 sameAs 2101178490 @default.
• W2101178490 citedByCount "49" @default.
• W2101178490 countsByYear W21011784902012 @default.
• W2101178490 countsByYear W21011784902013 @default.
• W2101178490 countsByYear W21011784902014 @default.
• W2101178490 countsByYear W21011784902015 @default.
• W2101178490 countsByYear W21011784902016 @default.
• W2101178490 countsByYear W21011784902017 @default.
• W2101178490 countsByYear W21011784902018 @default.
• W2101178490 countsByYear W21011784902019 @default.
• W2101178490 countsByYear W21011784902020 @default.
• W2101178490 countsByYear W21011784902021 @default.
• W2101178490 countsByYear W21011784902022 @default.
• W2101178490 countsByYear W21011784902023 @default.
• W2101178490 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2101178490 hasAuthorship W2101178490A5082173751 @default.
• W2101178490 hasBestOaLocation W21011784901 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C2780233690 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C65414064 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C84976871 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C139621336 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C151730666 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C15744967 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C160735492 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C17744445 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C199539241 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C2779343474 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C2780233690 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C39549134 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C44725695 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C65414064 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C71924100 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C77805123 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C84976871 @default.
• W2101178490 hasConceptScore W2101178490C86803240 @default.
• W2101178490 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2101178490 hasLocation W21011784901 @default.
• W2101178490 hasLocation W21011784902 @default.
• W2101178490 hasLocation W21011784903 @default.
• W2101178490 hasLocation W21011784904 @default.
• W2101178490 hasOpenAccess W2101178490 @default.
• W2101178490 hasPrimaryLocation W21011784901 @default.
• W2101178490 hasRelatedWork W2120386989 @default.
• W2101178490 hasRelatedWork W2155925088 @default.
• W2101178490 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2101178490 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.

• next