FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2101553917> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2101553917 endingPage "196" @default.
• W2101553917 startingPage "183" @default.
• W2101553917 abstract "The topic of ecological, practical, and political considerations in the selection of weed targets for biological control has been widely discussed during the past two decades, mostly from the perspective of insect herbivores. For conceptual and practical purposes, plant pathogens have been treated in these discussions as if they are a subset of inoculative biocontrol agents, with little said about the inherent differences between pathogens and insects as biocontrol agents or the selection of weed targets for control by the inundative, bioherbicide strategy. Herein, I attempt to address the question of what makes a good biological control target for plant pathogens used as inoculative as well as inundative agents, basing my analysis on examples from the past three decades. Despite the small number of examples available for this analysis, the following generalizations can be made: (1) Weeds with robust capacity for vegetative regeneration are more difficult to control with pathogens than those that lack this trait. (2) A plant’s growth habit is not a reliable guide for target selection; weeds that have been successfully controlled include annual and biennial herbs, perennial shrubs, perennial vines, and trees, while numerous failures have been reported irrespective of the target’s growth habit or reproductive mode. (3) It is more challenging to control species with genetic heterogeneity and capacity for introgression than genetically homogeneous and reproductively conserved species. (4) Matching the target host’s susceptibility with the candidate pathogen’s virulence is of utmost importance for biocontrol success since host–pathogen interactions at the species and subspecies levels are often governed by single-gene differences (e.g., varietal specificity). (5) Practical and political considerations are central to the selection of targets for control with pathogens. (6) Demand from influential stakeholders for control and/or for a nonchemical or economically sustainable control typically drives the initiative as well as the continuance of biocontrol projects to their completion. (7) In the case of inundative, bioherbicide agents, the continuity and ultimate implementation of a project will be dictated by the prospects of economic returns from developing and using a pathogen. (8) The stakeholders’ perceptions of the effectiveness of a biocontrol program can be unpredictable, leading to conflicting views of “success.” In the final analysis, a good weed target for control by a pathogen is one that has strong stakeholder backing and the list of available pathogens for the target suggests a possibility of acceptable control at a cost that is competitive with those of other control options. While this conclusion is also applicable to target selection for insect biocontrol agents, it is more relevant for pathogens because of limited funding and personnel available for development of pathogens and the added cost and technological complexity of implementing bioherbicides compared to classical biocontrols." @default.
• W2101553917 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2101553917 creator A5041411699 @default.
• W2101553917 date "2005-12-01" @default.
• W2101553917 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2101553917 title "Ecological, practical, and political inputs into selection of weed targets: What makes a good biological control target?" @default.
• W2101553917 cites W1574769493 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W1968550804 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W1970239128 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W1974125455 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W1974610100 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W1982318930 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W1988609609 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W1996065946 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W1996735293 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W1997329494 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2001266026 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2001804917 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2005994579 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2007539837 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2008927048 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2009470955 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2009719435 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2012515118 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2012882776 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2013662871 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2015342595 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2016162382 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2030448020 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2030562267 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2031623978 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2037780350 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2038499983 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2067429643 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2067680428 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2072730053 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2091931990 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2128532659 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2128769658 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2141374371 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2152067544 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2167996558 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2321076945 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2326967335 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2332765737 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2334240104 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2394826840 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W242437266 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2535676264 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2791138159 @default.
• W2101553917 cites W2947919378 @default.
• W2101553917 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.07.009" @default.
• W2101553917 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2101553917 type Work @default.
• W2101553917 sameAs 2101553917 @default.
• W2101553917 citedByCount "125" @default.
• W2101553917 countsByYear W21015539172012 @default.
• W2101553917 countsByYear W21015539172013 @default.
• W2101553917 countsByYear W21015539172014 @default.
• W2101553917 countsByYear W21015539172015 @default.
• W2101553917 countsByYear W21015539172016 @default.
• W2101553917 countsByYear W21015539172017 @default.
• W2101553917 countsByYear W21015539172018 @default.
• W2101553917 countsByYear W21015539172019 @default.
• W2101553917 countsByYear W21015539172020 @default.
• W2101553917 countsByYear W21015539172021 @default.
• W2101553917 countsByYear W21015539172022 @default.
• W2101553917 countsByYear W21015539172023 @default.
• W2101553917 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2101553917 hasAuthorship W2101553917A5041411699 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConcept C104727253 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConcept C150903083 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConcept C24461792 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConcept C2775891814 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConcept C2780843696 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConcept C44670240 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConcept C81917197 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConceptScore W2101553917C104727253 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConceptScore W2101553917C150903083 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConceptScore W2101553917C154945302 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConceptScore W2101553917C15744967 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConceptScore W2101553917C18903297 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConceptScore W2101553917C24461792 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConceptScore W2101553917C2775891814 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConceptScore W2101553917C2780843696 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConceptScore W2101553917C41008148 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConceptScore W2101553917C44670240 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConceptScore W2101553917C542102704 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConceptScore W2101553917C81917197 @default.
• W2101553917 hasConceptScore W2101553917C86803240 @default.
• W2101553917 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2101553917 hasLocation W21015539171 @default.

• next