FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2102251185> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2102251185 endingPage "166" @default.
• W2102251185 startingPage "164" @default.
• W2102251185 abstract "A Review of:&#x0D; Reilly, M., & Thompson, S. (2014). Understanding ultimate use data and its implication for digital library management: A case study. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(2), 196-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.901211 &#x0D; &#x0D; Abstract&#x0D; &#x0D; Objective – To investigate the implications of intended and actual usage data retrieved from a digital library on digital library management and design.&#x0D; &#x0D; Design – Case study.&#x0D; &#x0D; Setting – A digital library of predominantly high resolution images based at a large research university in the United States of America. &#x0D; &#x0D; Subjects – Responses from 917 users of an open access digital library.&#x0D; &#x0D; Methods – Researchers used a literature review to identify previous research on this topic and to inform the methodology for their research. Two distinct studies informed the methodology: research by Beaudoin (2009) that identified categories of both users and questions around usage was incorporated, and the ultimate use categories suggested by Chung and Yoon (2011) to compare against those used in this research. Researchers used data extracted via recorded system logs that are part of the statistics feature of the digital library. This feature is an in-house developed system, the Digital Cart Service (DCS). The logs tracked usage of 917 images recorded over a three year period, from 2011-2013. After eliminating personal information, researchers examined three fields: university affiliation, intended use, and description. After exporting the data from these three fields to a Microsoft Access database for text analysis, researchers normalized the data using a series of codes assigned to the responses. It is unclear how many description fields were used to yield more information.&#x0D; &#x0D; Main Results – Researchers identified five user-types among users of the digital library. The biggest user group was visitors, followed by university staff, while university faculty had the lowest usage. Visitors were found to use images for personal use, such as inspirational and artistic purposes. The products developed from images in the digital library were-wide ranging, and included image albums, research, artwork, and video productions. These findings have implications for four areas of practical management of digital libraries: metadata creation, system design, marketing and promotion, and content selection. Among the eight categories of intended uses recorded, the highest uses were found to be for personal use, followed by ‘other’ use. Researchers examined the ‘other’ use category and further divided it into 12 sub-categories. Of these sub-categories, the highest use was for publication and research, while the lowest use was for ‘gift’ and ‘industry.’&#x0D; &#x0D; Conclusion – Incorporating user-generated metadata and distributing it to digital library managers is found to produce enhanced metadata and to aid the promotion and awareness of collections. Usage data may inform marketing efforts, as it provides a more comprehensive picture of who uses digital libraries and why they use images retrieved from those libraries. Equally, usage data may reveal the least frequent users of digital libraries, which informs targeted user marketing campaigns. Finally, the authors find that usage data combined with user-generated metadata should form part of content selection criteria for digital library managers." @default.
• W2102251185 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2102251185 creator A5030931036 @default.
• W2102251185 date "2015-06-14" @default.
• W2102251185 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2102251185 title "Usage Data of Images from a Digital Library Informs Four Areas of Digital Library Management: Metadata Creation, System Design, Marketing and Promotion, and Content Selection" @default.
• W2102251185 cites W2057632850 @default.
• W2102251185 cites W2118492778 @default.
• W2102251185 cites W2138278078 @default.
• W2102251185 cites W2141175108 @default.
• W2102251185 doi "https://doi.org/10.18438/b8sp5p" @default.
• W2102251185 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2102251185 type Work @default.
• W2102251185 sameAs 2102251185 @default.
• W2102251185 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2102251185 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2102251185 hasAuthorship W2102251185A5030931036 @default.
• W2102251185 hasBestOaLocation W21022511851 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C136264566 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C164913051 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C513874922 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C93518851 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConcept C98147612 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C124952713 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C136264566 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C136764020 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C142362112 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C162324750 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C164913051 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C17744445 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C199539241 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C23123220 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C2780378061 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C41008148 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C513874922 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C93518851 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C94625758 @default.
• W2102251185 hasConceptScore W2102251185C98147612 @default.
• W2102251185 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2102251185 hasLocation W21022511851 @default.
• W2102251185 hasLocation W21022511852 @default.
• W2102251185 hasOpenAccess W2102251185 @default.
• W2102251185 hasPrimaryLocation W21022511851 @default.
• W2102251185 hasRelatedWork W1554993229 @default.
• W2102251185 hasRelatedWork W1556178152 @default.
• W2102251185 hasRelatedWork W1965294778 @default.
• W2102251185 hasRelatedWork W2009599571 @default.
• W2102251185 hasRelatedWork W2076264610 @default.
• W2102251185 hasRelatedWork W2146043838 @default.
• W2102251185 hasRelatedWork W2349174110 @default.
• W2102251185 hasRelatedWork W2361349944 @default.
• W2102251185 hasRelatedWork W2381351160 @default.
• W2102251185 hasRelatedWork W2963732858 @default.
• W2102251185 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W2102251185 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2102251185 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2102251185 magId "2102251185" @default.
• W2102251185 workType "article" @default.