FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2102585712> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2102585712 endingPage "1321" @default.
• W2102585712 startingPage "1313" @default.
• W2102585712 abstract "ObjectiveRecent randomized controlled trials have shown that age significantly affects the outcome of carotid revascularization procedures. This study used data from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Registry (VR) to report the influence of age on the comparative effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS).MethodsVR collects provider-reported data on patients using a Web-based database. Patients were stratified by age and symptoms. The primary end point was the composite outcome of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days.ResultsAs of December 7, 2010, there were 1347 CEA and 861 CAS patients aged <65 years and 4169 CEA and 2536 CAS patients aged ≥65 years. CAS patients in both age groups were more likely to have a disease etiology of radiation or restenosis, be symptomatic, and have more cardiac comorbidities. In patients aged <65 years, the primary end point (5.23% CAS vs 3.56% CEA; P = .065) did not reach statistical significance. Subgroup analyses showed that CAS had a higher combined death/stroke/MI rate (4.44% vs 2.10%; P < .031) in asymptomatic patients but there was no difference in the symptomatic (6.00% vs 5.47%; P = .79) group. In patients aged ≥65 years, CEA had lower rates of death (0.91% vs 1.97%; P < .01), stroke (2.52% vs 4.89%; P < .01), and composite death/stroke/MI (4.27% vs 7.14%; P < .01). CEA in patients aged ≥65 years was associated with lower rates of the primary end point in symptomatic (5.27% vs 9.52%; P < .01) and asymptomatic (3.31% vs 5.27%; P < .01) subgroups. After risk adjustment, CAS patients aged ≥65 years were more likely to reach the primary end point.ConclusionsCompared with CEA, CAS resulted in inferior 30-day outcomes in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients aged ≥65 years. These findings do not support the widespread use of CAS in patients aged ≥65 years. Recent randomized controlled trials have shown that age significantly affects the outcome of carotid revascularization procedures. This study used data from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Registry (VR) to report the influence of age on the comparative effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS). VR collects provider-reported data on patients using a Web-based database. Patients were stratified by age and symptoms. The primary end point was the composite outcome of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days. As of December 7, 2010, there were 1347 CEA and 861 CAS patients aged <65 years and 4169 CEA and 2536 CAS patients aged ≥65 years. CAS patients in both age groups were more likely to have a disease etiology of radiation or restenosis, be symptomatic, and have more cardiac comorbidities. In patients aged <65 years, the primary end point (5.23% CAS vs 3.56% CEA; P = .065) did not reach statistical significance. Subgroup analyses showed that CAS had a higher combined death/stroke/MI rate (4.44% vs 2.10%; P < .031) in asymptomatic patients but there was no difference in the symptomatic (6.00% vs 5.47%; P = .79) group. In patients aged ≥65 years, CEA had lower rates of death (0.91% vs 1.97%; P < .01), stroke (2.52% vs 4.89%; P < .01), and composite death/stroke/MI (4.27% vs 7.14%; P < .01). CEA in patients aged ≥65 years was associated with lower rates of the primary end point in symptomatic (5.27% vs 9.52%; P < .01) and asymptomatic (3.31% vs 5.27%; P < .01) subgroups. After risk adjustment, CAS patients aged ≥65 years were more likely to reach the primary end point. Compared with CEA, CAS resulted in inferior 30-day outcomes in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients aged ≥65 years. These findings do not support the widespread use of CAS in patients aged ≥65 years." @default.
• W2102585712 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2102585712 creator A5001839324 @default.
• W2102585712 creator A5013680558 @default.
• W2102585712 creator A5028497944 @default.
• W2102585712 creator A5062107169 @default.
• W2102585712 creator A5072676259 @default.
• W2102585712 creator A5075931249 @default.
• W2102585712 date "2012-05-01" @default.
• W2102585712 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2102585712 title "Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Vascular Registry evaluation of comparative effectiveness of carotid revascularization procedures stratified by Medicare age" @default.
• W2102585712 cites W127283835 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W1435001598 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W1740376762 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W1965652425 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W1975029410 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W1990138422 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2039146023 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2051412057 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2055375030 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2065740147 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2076513638 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2081385142 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2091789730 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2092501962 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2093837272 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2096569664 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2097446168 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2100194095 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2100589294 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2106844548 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2122528416 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2126636620 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2612334191 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W2767911074 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W4241441962 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W4324264875 @default.
• W2102585712 cites W4376848366 @default.
• W2102585712 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.128" @default.
• W2102585712 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5315490" @default.
• W2102585712 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22459755" @default.
• W2102585712 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2102585712 type Work @default.
• W2102585712 sameAs 2102585712 @default.
• W2102585712 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2102585712 countsByYear W21025857122012 @default.
• W2102585712 countsByYear W21025857122013 @default.
• W2102585712 countsByYear W21025857122014 @default.
• W2102585712 countsByYear W21025857122015 @default.
• W2102585712 countsByYear W21025857122016 @default.
• W2102585712 countsByYear W21025857122017 @default.
• W2102585712 countsByYear W21025857122019 @default.
• W2102585712 countsByYear W21025857122020 @default.
• W2102585712 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2102585712 hasAuthorship W2102585712A5001839324 @default.
• W2102585712 hasAuthorship W2102585712A5013680558 @default.
• W2102585712 hasAuthorship W2102585712A5028497944 @default.
• W2102585712 hasAuthorship W2102585712A5062107169 @default.
• W2102585712 hasAuthorship W2102585712A5072676259 @default.
• W2102585712 hasAuthorship W2102585712A5075931249 @default.
• W2102585712 hasBestOaLocation W21025857121 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C203092338 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C2777910003 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C2779745121 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C2781068581 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C29374701 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C126322002 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C127413603 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C141071460 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C164705383 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C168563851 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C203092338 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C2777910003 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C2779134260 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C2779464278 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C2779745121 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C2780007028 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C2780645631 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C2781068581 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C29374701 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C500558357 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C71924100 @default.
• W2102585712 hasConceptScore W2102585712C78519656 @default.
• W2102585712 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2102585712 hasLocation W21025857121 @default.
• W2102585712 hasLocation W21025857122 @default.

• next