FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2102632130> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2102632130 endingPage "448" @default.
• W2102632130 startingPage "444" @default.
• W2102632130 abstract "The aims of this study were to assess the value of specimen radiographs of stereotactic core biopsy, the usefulness of measuring size of calcifications on tissue sections, whether demonstration of calcifications in tissue sections alters the pathological diagnosis when specimen radiograph demonstrates calcifications, and to correlate these assessments with diagnostic outcome. A total of 301 core biopsies from 266 women with 274 mammographically suspicious areas of calcifications were examined. Core biopsies (five cores per procedure) were obtained stereotactically using a 14-gauge needle in an automated Biopty gun. Prior to processing of the tissue, 214 core biopsy specimens from 193 women with 197 lesions were radiographed. Of the 301 core biopsies, 56 (19%) were diagnosed as malignant, 15 (5%) were diagnosed as atypical ductal hyperplasia and 230 (76%) contained benign breast tissue. Of the core biopsies diagnosed as benign, 160 (70%) had specimen radiography prior to processing. Of these, 109 (69%) core biopsies showed calcifications on specimen radiographs. In 96 (88%) of these core biopsies, calcifications measuring >100 μm were found on the initial tissue sections. In 11 (10%) further deeper sections were required to detect calcifications >100 μm; however, this did not result in a change of the pathological diagnosis. Two of the 109 (1.8%) “benign” core biopsies, which contained tissue calcifications >100 μm and at that time were considered representative of the mammographic lesion, have had a malignant outcome on clinical and mammographic follow-up ranging from 2.4 to 7.5 years. Of the 51 (31%) core biopsies where calcifications were not seen on specimen radiographs, histological calcifications were not found in 34 (67%) core biopsies, whereas in 17 (33%) core biopsies, calcifications measuring <100 μm were found. All of these core biopsies were considered non-diagnostic and therefore not representative of the lesion targeted. Five (9.8%) of these cases had a malignant outcome with either immediate rebiopsy or excision. Accurate diagnosis of all mammographic lesions requires radiological-pathological correlation. This study shows that the presence of calcifications on the specimen radiograph and the demonstration of tissue calcifications >100 μm are an essential and highly reliable part of core biopsy assessment for mammographically “suspicious” calcifications. Nevertheless, lesions with “highly suspicious” calcifications on mammography should be considered for excision even if the core biopsy diagnosis is benign and calcifications >100 μm are present. The aims of this study were to assess the value of specimen radiographs of stereotactic core biopsy, the usefulness of measuring size of calcifications on tissue sections, whether demonstration of calcifications in tissue sections alters the pathological diagnosis when specimen radiograph demonstrates calcifications, and to correlate these assessments with diagnostic outcome. A total of 301 core biopsies from 266 women with 274 mammographically suspicious areas of calcifications were examined. Core biopsies (five cores per procedure) were obtained stereotactically using a 14-gauge needle in an automated Biopty gun. Prior to processing of the tissue, 214 core biopsy specimens from 193 women with 197 lesions were radiographed. Of the 301 core biopsies, 56 (19%) were diagnosed as malignant, 15 (5%) were diagnosed as atypical ductal hyperplasia and 230 (76%) contained benign breast tissue. Of the core biopsies diagnosed as benign, 160 (70%) had specimen radiography prior to processing. Of these, 109 (69%) core biopsies showed calcifications on specimen radiographs. In 96 (88%) of these core biopsies, calcifications measuring >100 μm were found on the initial tissue sections. In 11 (10%) further deeper sections were required to detect calcifications >100 μm; however, this did not result in a change of the pathological diagnosis. Two of the 109 (1.8%) “benign” core biopsies, which contained tissue calcifications >100 μm and at that time were considered representative of the mammographic lesion, have had a malignant outcome on clinical and mammographic follow-up ranging from 2.4 to 7.5 years. Of the 51 (31%) core biopsies where calcifications were not seen on specimen radiographs, histological calcifications were not found in 34 (67%) core biopsies, whereas in 17 (33%) core biopsies, calcifications measuring <100 μm were found. All of these core biopsies were considered non-diagnostic and therefore not representative of the lesion targeted. Five (9.8%) of these cases had a malignant outcome with either immediate rebiopsy or excision. Accurate diagnosis of all mammographic lesions requires radiological-pathological correlation. This study shows that the presence of calcifications on the specimen radiograph and the demonstration of tissue calcifications >100 μm are an essential and highly reliable part of core biopsy assessment for mammographically “suspicious” calcifications. Nevertheless, lesions with “highly suspicious” calcifications on mammography should be considered for excision even if the core biopsy diagnosis is benign and calcifications >100 μm are present." @default.
• W2102632130 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2102632130 creator A5025274207 @default.
• W2102632130 creator A5064156396 @default.
• W2102632130 date "2001-01-01" @default.
• W2102632130 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W2102632130 title "Histological correlation of mammographically detected microcalcifications in stereotactic core biopsies" @default.
• W2102632130 cites W1923098349 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W1972745603 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W1974162300 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W1993933044 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2009519539 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2014010162 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2016753863 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2018477537 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2021921677 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2032691177 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2039602243 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2039980786 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2059068665 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2079534040 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2095084464 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2099596451 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2125595605 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2134604983 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2137063700 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2145952358 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2321231343 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2331600498 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W2419356401 @default.
• W2102632130 cites W4248745787 @default.
• W2102632130 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/00313020120083160" @default.
• W2102632130 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11827410" @default.
• W2102632130 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2102632130 type Work @default.
• W2102632130 sameAs 2102632130 @default.
• W2102632130 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W2102632130 countsByYear W21026321302012 @default.
• W2102632130 countsByYear W21026321302013 @default.
• W2102632130 countsByYear W21026321302015 @default.
• W2102632130 countsByYear W21026321302016 @default.
• W2102632130 countsByYear W21026321302017 @default.
• W2102632130 countsByYear W21026321302018 @default.
• W2102632130 countsByYear W21026321302023 @default.
• W2102632130 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2102632130 hasAuthorship W2102632130A5025274207 @default.
• W2102632130 hasAuthorship W2102632130A5064156396 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C207886595 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C2780309369 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C2781129008 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C3019914693 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C3020109028 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C121608353 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C126322002 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C126838900 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C142724271 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C207886595 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C2775934546 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C2780309369 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C2780472235 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C2781129008 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C3019914693 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C3020109028 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C36454342 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C530470458 @default.
• W2102632130 hasConceptScore W2102632130C71924100 @default.
• W2102632130 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2102632130 hasLocation W21026321301 @default.
• W2102632130 hasLocation W21026321302 @default.
• W2102632130 hasOpenAccess W2102632130 @default.
• W2102632130 hasPrimaryLocation W21026321301 @default.
• W2102632130 hasRelatedWork W1973361179 @default.
• W2102632130 hasRelatedWork W1985884271 @default.
• W2102632130 hasRelatedWork W2069686878 @default.
• W2102632130 hasRelatedWork W2134604983 @default.
• W2102632130 hasRelatedWork W2355912880 @default.
• W2102632130 hasRelatedWork W2382505863 @default.
• W2102632130 hasRelatedWork W2413263973 @default.
• W2102632130 hasRelatedWork W2953999245 @default.
• W2102632130 hasRelatedWork W3014405674 @default.
• W2102632130 hasRelatedWork W4245485277 @default.
• W2102632130 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W2102632130 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2102632130 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2102632130 magId "2102632130" @default.
• W2102632130 workType "article" @default.