FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2102674179> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2102674179 endingPage "1165" @default.
• W2102674179 startingPage "1156" @default.
• W2102674179 abstract "Multiple meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, the highest available level of evidence, have been conducted to determine whether double-row (DR) or single-row (SR) rotator cuff repair (RCR) provides superior clinical outcomes and structural healing; however, results are discordant. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of meta-analyses comparing SR and DR RCR to elucidate the cause of discordance and to determine which meta-analysis provides the current best available evidence.In this study we evaluated available scientific support for SR versus DR RCR by systematically reviewing the literature for published meta-analyses. Data were extracted from these meta-analyses for patient outcomes and structural healing. Meta-analysis quality was assessed with the Oxman-Guyatt and Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses (QUOROM) systems. The Jadad algorithm was then applied to determine which meta-analyses provided the highest level of evidence.Eight meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria: 4 including Level I evidence and 4 including both Level I and Level II evidence. Six meta-analyses found no differences between SR and DR RCR for patient outcomes, whereas 2 favored DR RCR for tears greater than 3 cm. Two meta-analyses found no structural healing differences between SR and DR RCR, whereas 3 found DR repair to be superior for tears greater than 3 cm and 2 found DR repair to be superior for all tears. Four meta-analyses had low Oxman-Guyatt scores (<3) indicative of major flaws. After application of the Jadad algorithm, 3 concordant high-quality meta-analyses were selected, all of which found significantly better structural healing with DR compared with SR RCR.According to this systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses comparing SR and DR RCR, the current highest level of evidence suggests that DR RCR provides superior structural healing to SR RCR.Level II, systematic review of Level I and II studies." @default.
• W2102674179 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2102674179 creator A5022106962 @default.
• W2102674179 creator A5033926399 @default.
• W2102674179 creator A5055128851 @default.
• W2102674179 creator A5064391561 @default.
• W2102674179 creator A5078606310 @default.
• W2102674179 creator A5079427685 @default.
• W2102674179 creator A5085699565 @default.
• W2102674179 date "2014-09-01" @default.
• W2102674179 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2102674179 title "Is Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Clinically Superior to Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses" @default.
• W2102674179 cites W1863138831 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W1964603327 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W1964661220 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W1975378728 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W1981459394 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W1982804245 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W1983496240 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W1991967079 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W1996746804 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W1996752751 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2000442546 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2005694401 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2011402505 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2012970839 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2014868303 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2016343792 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2023552260 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2024645680 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2025353475 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2025739189 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2044165970 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2049146455 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2050537861 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2051634870 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2064301576 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2065150107 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2069431177 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2071269262 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2088291840 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2090264947 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2091676667 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2100097735 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2100603775 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2102376642 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2102728551 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2103637454 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2109345357 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2111321988 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2116024004 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2121758806 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2121910380 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2122271889 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2122717337 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2124047692 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2125174350 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2125651000 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2129444957 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2140138628 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2143928512 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2151955482 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2152412959 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2157071691 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2159627298 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2162333916 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2167851219 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W2168927320 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W4255097449 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W4294291846 @default.
• W2102674179 cites W4378763086 @default.
• W2102674179 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.015" @default.
• W2102674179 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24821226" @default.
• W2102674179 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2102674179 type Work @default.
• W2102674179 sameAs 2102674179 @default.
• W2102674179 citedByCount "90" @default.
• W2102674179 countsByYear W21026741792014 @default.
• W2102674179 countsByYear W21026741792015 @default.
• W2102674179 countsByYear W21026741792016 @default.
• W2102674179 countsByYear W21026741792017 @default.
• W2102674179 countsByYear W21026741792018 @default.
• W2102674179 countsByYear W21026741792019 @default.
• W2102674179 countsByYear W21026741792020 @default.
• W2102674179 countsByYear W21026741792021 @default.
• W2102674179 countsByYear W21026741792022 @default.
• W2102674179 countsByYear W21026741792023 @default.
• W2102674179 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2102674179 hasAuthorship W2102674179A5022106962 @default.
• W2102674179 hasAuthorship W2102674179A5033926399 @default.
• W2102674179 hasAuthorship W2102674179A5055128851 @default.
• W2102674179 hasAuthorship W2102674179A5064391561 @default.
• W2102674179 hasAuthorship W2102674179A5078606310 @default.
• W2102674179 hasAuthorship W2102674179A5079427685 @default.
• W2102674179 hasAuthorship W2102674179A5085699565 @default.
• W2102674179 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2102674179 hasConcept C136524200 @default.
• W2102674179 hasConcept C141071460 @default.

• next