FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2102986376> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2102986376 endingPage "1602" @default.
• W2102986376 startingPage "1602" @default.
• W2102986376 abstract "With great interest, we read the systematic review by Harris et al.1Harris J.D. Gupta A.K. Mall N.A. et al.Long-term outcomes after Bankart shoulder stabilization.Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 920-933Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (201) Google Scholar entitled “Long-Term Outcomes After Bankart Shoulder Stabilization,” and we compliment the authors on their extensive and well-designed overview. They describe the long-term outcome, including recurrent instability, return to sport, postoperative osteoarthritis, and Rowe and Constant scores, after the most frequently used Bankart repair techniques, both open and arthroscopic. To keep their pooled data homogeneous, Harris et al.1Harris J.D. Gupta A.K. Mall N.A. et al.Long-term outcomes after Bankart shoulder stabilization.Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 920-933Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (201) Google Scholar understandably included only those articles in which failures were defined as fully redislocated shoulders. This unfortunately excludes patient-reported subluxations, which would lead to a much higher failure rate. This raises a very important question: How should we define a failure after surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability? In our opinion, subluxations should be counted as failures too, based on 2 arguments. First, considering the fact that stable shoulder function is the purpose of our treatment, failure is a very important primary outcome after stabilization. The subjective experience of a shoulder subluxation is very inconvenient and an adverse surgical outcome for patients. Although only patients can tell their doctors what they experience during daily activities, we postulate that their own patients' experience or opinion should be central. Moreover, this is in line with the international trend of the increasing use of patient-reported outcome measurements to monitor results. Second, recurrent traumatic subluxation itself can be a reason for surgical treatment initially. Excluding subluxations postoperatively as failures would be applying a double standard. Although we agree with Harris et al.1Harris J.D. Gupta A.K. Mall N.A. et al.Long-term outcomes after Bankart shoulder stabilization.Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 920-933Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (201) Google Scholar that, ideally, both real dislocations and subluxations or positive apprehensions should be noted separately, we argue that defining only fully dislocated shoulders as failures is an underestimation of the effect of our surgical treatment. We emphasize that keeping patients' opinion central and being unambiguous in indication and outcome, it is justified to include both redislocations and subluxations as failures in future studies. Long-Term Outcomes After Bankart Shoulder StabilizationArthroscopyVol. 29Issue 5PreviewThe purposes of this study were (1) to analyze long-term outcomes in patients who have undergone open or arthroscopic Bankart repair and (2) to evaluate study methodologic quality through validated tools. Full-Text PDF Authors' ReplyArthroscopyVol. 29Issue 10PreviewWe thank Drs. van der Linde, van Kampen, and Willems for their interest and kind words regarding our article and appreciate their comments. They recognize a challenging postoperative evaluation of shoulder stability and recommend consideration of subluxations as failures based on sound argument. Both pre- and postoperatively, the assessment of shoulder stability exhibits a wide spectrum from positional apprehension to frank dislocation requiring manual reduction. In between, there is significant variation in the patient's reporting of “instability.” Since the primary purpose of surgery for instability is to gain stability, the subjective feeling of one's “shoulder popping out” after surgery is largely a “failure.” In fact, even without dislocation, this may lead a patient to undergo revision stabilization. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W2102986376 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2102986376 creator A5005352832 @default.
• W2102986376 creator A5023743416 @default.
• W2102986376 creator A5082127956 @default.
• W2102986376 date "2013-10-01" @default.
• W2102986376 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2102986376 title "How Should We Define Failure After Surgical Shoulder Stabilization?" @default.
• W2102986376 cites W2018452585 @default.
• W2102986376 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.008" @default.
• W2102986376 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24075611" @default.
• W2102986376 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2102986376 type Work @default.
• W2102986376 sameAs 2102986376 @default.
• W2102986376 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2102986376 countsByYear W21029863762015 @default.
• W2102986376 countsByYear W21029863762016 @default.
• W2102986376 countsByYear W21029863762017 @default.
• W2102986376 countsByYear W21029863762018 @default.
• W2102986376 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2102986376 hasAuthorship W2102986376A5005352832 @default.
• W2102986376 hasAuthorship W2102986376A5023743416 @default.
• W2102986376 hasAuthorship W2102986376A5082127956 @default.
• W2102986376 hasBestOaLocation W21029863761 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C2776824190 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C2777325788 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C2778436160 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C2780879209 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C2909651949 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C141071460 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C142724271 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C17744445 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C199539241 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C204787440 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C2776824190 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C2777325788 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C2778436160 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C2779162959 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C2779473830 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C2780879209 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C2909651949 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C61434518 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C71924100 @default.
• W2102986376 hasConceptScore W2102986376C83867959 @default.
• W2102986376 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2102986376 hasLocation W21029863761 @default.
• W2102986376 hasLocation W21029863762 @default.
• W2102986376 hasOpenAccess W2102986376 @default.
• W2102986376 hasPrimaryLocation W21029863761 @default.
• W2102986376 hasRelatedWork W1908741846 @default.
• W2102986376 hasRelatedWork W1976782511 @default.
• W2102986376 hasRelatedWork W2074892058 @default.
• W2102986376 hasRelatedWork W2087377818 @default.
• W2102986376 hasRelatedWork W2097102899 @default.
• W2102986376 hasRelatedWork W2117053878 @default.
• W2102986376 hasRelatedWork W2240378318 @default.
• W2102986376 hasRelatedWork W2930174514 @default.
• W2102986376 hasRelatedWork W3157656668 @default.
• W2102986376 hasRelatedWork W877005524 @default.
• W2102986376 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W2102986376 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2102986376 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2102986376 magId "2102986376" @default.
• W2102986376 workType "article" @default.