FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2103138110> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2103138110 endingPage "R191" @default.
• W2103138110 startingPage "R191" @default.
• W2103138110 abstract "Our aim in this study was to assess whether the new Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure (GAP) scoring system, which is a modification of the Mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Arterial Pressure (MGAP) scoring system, better predicts in-hospital mortality and can be applied more easily than previous trauma scores among trauma patients in the emergency department (ED).This multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted to analyze readily available variables in the ED, which are associated with mortality rates among trauma patients. The data used in this study were derived from the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB), which consists of 114 major emergency hospitals in Japan. A total of 35,732 trauma patients in the JTDB from 2004 to 2009 who were 15 years of age or older were eligible for inclusion in the study. Of these patients, 27,154 (76%) with complete sets of important data (patient age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, systolic blood pressure (SBP), respiratory rate and Injury Severity Score (ISS)) were included in our analysis. We calculated weight for the predictors of the GAP scores on the basis of the records of 13,463 trauma patients in a derivation data set determined by using logistic regression. Scores derived from four existing scoring systems (Revised Trauma Score, Triage Revised Trauma Score, Trauma and Injury Severity Score and MGAP score) were calibrated using logistic regression models that fit in the derivation set. The GAP scoring system was compared to the calibrated scoring systems with data from a total of 13,691 patients in a validation data set using c-statistics and reclassification tables with three defined risk groups based on a previous publication: low risk (mortality < 5%), intermediate risk, and high risk (mortality > 50%).Calculated GAP scores involved GCS score (from three to fifteen points), patient age < 60 years (three points) and SBP (> 120 mmHg, six points; 60 to 120 mmHg, four points). The c-statistics for the GAP scores (0.933 for long-term mortality and 0.965 for short-term mortality) were better than or comparable to the trauma scores calculated using other scales. Compared with existing instruments, our reclassification tables show that the GAP scoring system reclassified all patients except one in the correct direction. In most cases, the observed incidence of death in patients who were reclassified matched what would have been predicted by the GAP scoring system.The GAP scoring system can predict in-hospital mortality more accurately than the previously developed trauma scoring systems." @default.
• W2103138110 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2103138110 creator A5007448236 @default.
• W2103138110 creator A5010070478 @default.
• W2103138110 creator A5027052805 @default.
• W2103138110 creator A5036014752 @default.
• W2103138110 creator A5070060207 @default.
• W2103138110 creator A5089351072 @default.
• W2103138110 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2103138110 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2103138110 title "Revised trauma scoring system to predict in-hospital mortality in the emergency department: Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure score" @default.
• W2103138110 cites W1990942988 @default.
• W2103138110 cites W2009962304 @default.
• W2103138110 cites W2021162115 @default.
• W2103138110 cites W2025756876 @default.
• W2103138110 cites W2030199379 @default.
• W2103138110 cites W2034072713 @default.
• W2103138110 cites W2057251172 @default.
• W2103138110 cites W2058264367 @default.
• W2103138110 cites W2059801387 @default.
• W2103138110 cites W2083066201 @default.
• W2103138110 cites W2088221041 @default.
• W2103138110 cites W2133861584 @default.
• W2103138110 cites W4293108385 @default.
• W2103138110 cites W4320301321 @default.
• W2103138110 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10348" @default.
• W2103138110 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3387633" @default.
• W2103138110 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21831280" @default.
• W2103138110 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2103138110 type Work @default.
• W2103138110 sameAs 2103138110 @default.
• W2103138110 citedByCount "133" @default.
• W2103138110 countsByYear W21031381102012 @default.
• W2103138110 countsByYear W21031381102013 @default.
• W2103138110 countsByYear W21031381102014 @default.
• W2103138110 countsByYear W21031381102015 @default.
• W2103138110 countsByYear W21031381102016 @default.
• W2103138110 countsByYear W21031381102017 @default.
• W2103138110 countsByYear W21031381102018 @default.
• W2103138110 countsByYear W21031381102019 @default.
• W2103138110 countsByYear W21031381102020 @default.
• W2103138110 countsByYear W21031381102021 @default.
• W2103138110 countsByYear W21031381102022 @default.
• W2103138110 countsByYear W21031381102023 @default.
• W2103138110 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2103138110 hasAuthorship W2103138110A5007448236 @default.
• W2103138110 hasAuthorship W2103138110A5010070478 @default.
• W2103138110 hasAuthorship W2103138110A5027052805 @default.
• W2103138110 hasAuthorship W2103138110A5036014752 @default.
• W2103138110 hasAuthorship W2103138110A5070060207 @default.
• W2103138110 hasAuthorship W2103138110A5089351072 @default.
• W2103138110 hasBestOaLocation W21031381101 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C17624336 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C190385971 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C2777120189 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C2777175280 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C2777914111 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConcept C85004164 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C118552586 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C126322002 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C141071460 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C151956035 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C17624336 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C190385971 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C194828623 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C23131810 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C2777120189 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C2777175280 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C2777914111 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C2780724011 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C3017944768 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C545542383 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C71924100 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C84393581 @default.
• W2103138110 hasConceptScore W2103138110C85004164 @default.
• W2103138110 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2103138110 hasLocation W21031381101 @default.
• W2103138110 hasLocation W21031381102 @default.
• W2103138110 hasLocation W21031381103 @default.
• W2103138110 hasLocation W21031381104 @default.
• W2103138110 hasLocation W21031381105 @default.
• W2103138110 hasLocation W21031381106 @default.
• W2103138110 hasOpenAccess W2103138110 @default.
• W2103138110 hasPrimaryLocation W21031381101 @default.
• W2103138110 hasRelatedWork W1544072161 @default.
• W2103138110 hasRelatedWork W2025089825 @default.
• W2103138110 hasRelatedWork W2067356294 @default.

• next