FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2103281609> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2103281609 endingPage "919" @default.
• W2103281609 startingPage "909" @default.
• W2103281609 abstract "Context In prior research, the scores assessors assign can be biased away from the standard of preceding performances (i.e. ‘contrast effects’ occur). Objectives This study examines the mechanism and robustness of these findings to advance understanding of assessor cognition. We test the influence of the immediately preceding performance relative to that of a series of prior performances. Further, we examine whether assessors’ narrative comments are similarly influenced by contrast effects. Methods Clinicians (n = 61) were randomised to three groups in a blinded, Internet-based experiment. Participants viewed identical videos of good, borderline and poor performances by first-year doctors in varied orders. They provided scores and written feedback after each video. Narrative comments were blindly content-analysed to generate measures of valence and content. Variability of narrative comments and scores was compared between groups. Results Comparisons indicated contrast effects after a single performance. When a good performance was preceded by a poor performance, ratings were higher (mean 5.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.79–5.24) than when observation of the good performance was unbiased (mean 4.36, 95% CI 4.14–4.60; p < 0.05, d = 1.3). Similarly, borderline performance was rated lower when preceded by good performance (mean 2.96, 95% CI 2.56–3.37) than when viewed without preceding bias (mean 3.55, 95% CI 3.17–3.92; p < 0.05, d = 0.7). The series of ratings participants assigned suggested that the magnitude of contrast effects is determined by an averaging of recent experiences. The valence (but not content) of narrative comments showed contrast effects similar to those found in numerical scores. Conclusions These findings are consistent with research from behavioural economics and psychology that suggests judgement tends to be relative in nature. Observing that the valence of narrative comments is similarly influenced suggests these effects represent more than difficulty in translating impressions into a number. The extent to which such factors impact upon assessment in practice remains to be determined as the influence is likely to depend on context." @default.
• W2103281609 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2103281609 creator A5008381243 @default.
• W2103281609 creator A5028893280 @default.
• W2103281609 creator A5030421646 @default.
• W2103281609 creator A5086206984 @default.
• W2103281609 date "2015-08-22" @default.
• W2103281609 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2103281609 title "Relatively speaking: contrast effects influence assessors’ scores and narrative feedback" @default.
• W2103281609 cites W1057512088 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W1502781505 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W1542501957 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W1685900114 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W1810330899 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W1969912135 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W1975114734 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W1979295035 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W1984161620 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W1992387380 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W1994615095 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2018155718 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2026248601 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2037134292 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2038712641 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2044944116 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2063730763 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2069551090 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2075902832 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2079886100 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2084929094 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2098384763 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2107677116 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2118672623 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2121168102 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2126976394 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2134052602 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2141944061 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2154563310 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2167251676 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2168991419 @default.
• W2103281609 cites W2170153256 @default.
• W2103281609 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12777" @default.
• W2103281609 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26296407" @default.
• W2103281609 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2103281609 type Work @default.
• W2103281609 sameAs 2103281609 @default.
• W2103281609 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2103281609 countsByYear W21032816092015 @default.
• W2103281609 countsByYear W21032816092016 @default.
• W2103281609 countsByYear W21032816092017 @default.
• W2103281609 countsByYear W21032816092018 @default.
• W2103281609 countsByYear W21032816092019 @default.
• W2103281609 countsByYear W21032816092020 @default.
• W2103281609 countsByYear W21032816092021 @default.
• W2103281609 countsByYear W21032816092022 @default.
• W2103281609 countsByYear W21032816092023 @default.
• W2103281609 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2103281609 hasAuthorship W2103281609A5008381243 @default.
• W2103281609 hasAuthorship W2103281609A5028893280 @default.
• W2103281609 hasAuthorship W2103281609A5030421646 @default.
• W2103281609 hasAuthorship W2103281609A5086206984 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C168900304 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C2776502983 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C121332964 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C126322002 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C138885662 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C151730666 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C154945302 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C15744967 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C168900304 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C199033989 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C2776502983 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C2779343474 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C41008148 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C41895202 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C44249647 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C548259974 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C62520636 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C70410870 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C71924100 @default.
• W2103281609 hasConceptScore W2103281609C77805123 @default.

• next