FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2103417903> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2103417903 endingPage "173" @default.
• W2103417903 startingPage "157" @default.
• W2103417903 abstract "The article investigates the quality of audit services that international and local (operating nationally) audit firms are offering. There has been a great amount of effort put in recent years to improve audit quality due to the increase of auditing scandals in various corporations across the world. To improve audit quality, it is crucial to assure that all the stakeholders of the auditing triangular relationship would be satisfied with the outcomes (what is provided) and the process (how the service is provided) of audit services. Considerable attention should be paid not only to the external users (third-parties), but also to the audit clients as their perceptions of what is a quality audit are very subjective.In the last couple of decades, there has been a lot of effort put into research whether the best international audit firms do actually provide audits of higher quality than the local audit firms that are based nationally. The main criterion that these firms are compared in a vast body of literature is the accuracy of the information that was provided to the third parties in auditors’ reports, i.e. in many studies the correct auditor’s report is used as a proxy for audit quality.The aim of this study was to investigate whether Lithuanian audit clients perceive audit services to be better in quality when employing local or international audit firms. This paper will theoretically discuss the audit quality differences between international and local audit firms, and it will present the results of the survey of Lithuanian audit clients.The survey used the questionnaire based on 12 audit quality criteria assessible for the client. The criteria represented audit service’s value added and the performance, i.e. how the audit was conducted. Results of the survey imply that both international and local audit firms provide their clients with the same level of added value and audit performance, except the following significant differences. It can be stated that Lithuanian audit clients perceive audit provided by local audit firms to be of a higher quality than those provided by international audit firms in terms of the insights on tax risks (value added criterion), partner’s involvement in their audit, and perceived competence of audit assistants (audit performance criteria)." @default.
• W2103417903 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2103417903 creator A5065353217 @default.
• W2103417903 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2103417903 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2103417903 title "DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AUDIT QUALITY PROVIDED BY INTERNATIONAL AND LOCAL AUDIT FIRMS: THE RESEARCH ON AUDIT CLIENTS’ PERCEPTIONS IN THE AUDIT MARKET OF LITHUANIA" @default.
• W2103417903 cites W197819443 @default.
• W2103417903 cites W1986110121 @default.
• W2103417903 cites W1990317644 @default.
• W2103417903 cites W2006467310 @default.
• W2103417903 cites W2021311243 @default.
• W2103417903 cites W2119445328 @default.
• W2103417903 cites W2124544233 @default.
• W2103417903 cites W2133986828 @default.
• W2103417903 cites W2329820131 @default.
• W2103417903 cites W2954070891 @default.
• W2103417903 cites W32111692 @default.
• W2103417903 doi "https://doi.org/10.15388/ekon.2014.93.5045" @default.
• W2103417903 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2103417903 type Work @default.
• W2103417903 sameAs 2103417903 @default.
• W2103417903 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2103417903 countsByYear W21034179032022 @default.
• W2103417903 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2103417903 hasAuthorship W2103417903A5065353217 @default.
• W2103417903 hasBestOaLocation W21034179031 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConcept C140181557 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConcept C147007100 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConcept C152550464 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConcept C156223087 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConcept C170856484 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConcept C177309310 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConcept C191602146 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConcept C62190432 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConceptScore W2103417903C121955636 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConceptScore W2103417903C140181557 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConceptScore W2103417903C144133560 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConceptScore W2103417903C147007100 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConceptScore W2103417903C152550464 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConceptScore W2103417903C156223087 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConceptScore W2103417903C170856484 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConceptScore W2103417903C177309310 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConceptScore W2103417903C191602146 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConceptScore W2103417903C199521495 @default.
• W2103417903 hasConceptScore W2103417903C62190432 @default.
• W2103417903 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2103417903 hasLocation W21034179031 @default.
• W2103417903 hasOpenAccess W2103417903 @default.
• W2103417903 hasPrimaryLocation W21034179031 @default.
• W2103417903 hasRelatedWork W1839452030 @default.
• W2103417903 hasRelatedWork W2025203145 @default.
• W2103417903 hasRelatedWork W2053398727 @default.
• W2103417903 hasRelatedWork W2103417903 @default.
• W2103417903 hasRelatedWork W2902315649 @default.
• W2103417903 hasRelatedWork W3124215193 @default.
• W2103417903 hasRelatedWork W3125966120 @default.
• W2103417903 hasRelatedWork W3208085112 @default.
• W2103417903 hasRelatedWork W4221079057 @default.
• W2103417903 hasRelatedWork W305950719 @default.
• W2103417903 hasVolume "93" @default.
• W2103417903 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2103417903 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2103417903 magId "2103417903" @default.
• W2103417903 workType "article" @default.