FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2104023951> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2104023951 endingPage "802" @default.
• W2104023951 startingPage "795" @default.
• W2104023951 abstract "In 1995, the associate editors of the Journal of Pediatric Psychology (JPP) published an article to encourage the submission of case reports, studies, and series (Drotar, LaGreca, Lemanek, & Kazak, 1995), which had been remarkably underrepresented in the portfolio of published articles. Apparently, this article did little to encourage submissions of case studies and series because the situation is unchanged. But being undaunted and persistent, I would like to revisit this issue in light of the continuing importance of case studies and series to the field of pediatric psychology. In its formative years, JPP published many case studies, series, and descriptions of programs (e.g., Bachara & Lamb, 1976; Davidson, Adams, Schroeder, & Tyler, 1978; O’Malley & Koocher, 1977). At that time, pediatric psychologists published such work in order to call attention to important and challenging clinical problems, as well as to share their experiences, ideas, and data concerning clinical practice. Given the state of the art of the science at that time, early case studies and series focused more on description of clinical problems and intervention methods than on empirical demonstrations of treatment efficacy, with some notable exceptions (e.g., Barnard, Christophersen, & Wolf, 1976; Linscheid, Copeland, Jacobstein, & Smith, 1981; Varni, 1980). What conclusion should we draw from the fact that recent submissions to and publications of case studies and series in JPP are so few and far between? Is it the case that the field of pediatric psychology has moved beyond the need for case studies and series to inform clinical practice and research? In fact, the standards for the evaluation of science in our field, including studies of intervention efficacy (Spirito & Kazak, 2006), are much higher now than they were in the early days of the field. Are case studies and series no longer relevant or competitive for publication in JPP? Another possibility is that pediatric psychologists have simply stopped trying to write up their case studies for JPP because they do not see it as a ready outlet for publication. Alternatively, they could be writing them, but submitting them to journals other than JPP. It’s hard to know. As the current editor of JPP, I believe that case studies and series have not outlived their usefulness and that the field of pediatric psychology will continue to benefit from their publication. To address this issue, this editorial has the following goals: (1) underscore the continuing need for the publication of case studies and series in JPP; (2) clarify issues that need to be considered in preparing and reviewing case studies and series; (3) suggest ways to enhance publishability; and (4) invite authors to submit manuscripts that focus on case studies and series." @default.
• W2104023951 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2104023951 creator A5043170718 @default.
• W2104023951 date "2009-07-16" @default.
• W2104023951 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2104023951 title "Editorial: Case Studies and Series: A Call for Action and Invitation for Submissions" @default.
• W2104023951 cites W149270486 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W1605115465 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W1965326392 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2019873296 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2042624260 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2066395220 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2085536285 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2089555281 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2095711133 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2099472611 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2104300489 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2112291931 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2114417714 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2114792459 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2127123406 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2133555027 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2133978009 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2137983955 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2143700582 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2144043977 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2144883251 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2144998788 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2151652522 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2152626708 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2154918258 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2157403918 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2159744735 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2159912144 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2171709270 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W4232424506 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W4235813114 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W4239355337 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W4251918685 @default.
• W2104023951 cites W2097836619 @default.
• W2104023951 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp059" @default.
• W2104023951 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19608637" @default.
• W2104023951 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2104023951 type Work @default.
• W2104023951 sameAs 2104023951 @default.
• W2104023951 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2104023951 countsByYear W21040239512012 @default.
• W2104023951 countsByYear W21040239512013 @default.
• W2104023951 countsByYear W21040239512014 @default.
• W2104023951 countsByYear W21040239512016 @default.
• W2104023951 countsByYear W21040239512017 @default.
• W2104023951 countsByYear W21040239512020 @default.
• W2104023951 countsByYear W21040239512021 @default.
• W2104023951 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2104023951 hasAuthorship W2104023951A5043170718 @default.
• W2104023951 hasBestOaLocation W21040239511 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConcept C105152847 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConcept C143724316 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConceptScore W2104023951C105152847 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConceptScore W2104023951C112698675 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConceptScore W2104023951C121332964 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConceptScore W2104023951C143724316 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConceptScore W2104023951C144133560 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConceptScore W2104023951C151730666 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConceptScore W2104023951C15744967 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConceptScore W2104023951C2780791683 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConceptScore W2104023951C41008148 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConceptScore W2104023951C62520636 @default.
• W2104023951 hasConceptScore W2104023951C86803240 @default.
• W2104023951 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2104023951 hasLocation W21040239511 @default.
• W2104023951 hasLocation W21040239512 @default.
• W2104023951 hasOpenAccess W2104023951 @default.
• W2104023951 hasPrimaryLocation W21040239511 @default.
• W2104023951 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2104023951 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2104023951 hasRelatedWork W2978862106 @default.
• W2104023951 hasRelatedWork W323884962 @default.
• W2104023951 hasRelatedWork W4211000693 @default.
• W2104023951 hasRelatedWork W4237674591 @default.
• W2104023951 hasRelatedWork W4254014269 @default.
• W2104023951 hasRelatedWork W4291937059 @default.
• W2104023951 hasRelatedWork W4300246016 @default.
• W2104023951 hasRelatedWork W2460556749 @default.
• W2104023951 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W2104023951 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2104023951 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2104023951 magId "2104023951" @default.
• W2104023951 workType "editorial" @default.