FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2105063886> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2105063886 endingPage "328" @default.
• W2105063886 startingPage "310" @default.
• W2105063886 abstract "Background context The injection of various solutions aimed at producing a sclerosing effect has been used to treat soft tissues injuries (eg, inguinal hernia) for more than 100 years. In the 1930s, this treatment approach was applied to injured joints in an attempt to stimulate connective tissue repair. Although several studies have been published about this method of treatment for various orthopedic and spinal indications (termed prolotherapy), its use remains controversial. Purpose To conduct a critical review of the literature on prolotherapy for spinal pain. Study design/setting Critical review of the literature. Methods Computerized medical literature databases (Medline, CINAHL, Mantis, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched to uncover all published information about the use of sclerosing injections in humans with spinal pain disorders. Search results were reviewed for relevance, and information was abstracted from full-text articles. Results Our search uncovered almost 200 reference materials in various media related to prolotherapy, including 31 clinical studies related to spinal pain. There were 26 observational cohorts and 5 randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Indications in these studies were low back pain (22), neck pain (3), cervical headaches (3) and dorsal or thoracic pain (3). A total of 20 sclerosing solutions were used in these studies; the most common was a mixture of dextrose 12.5%, glycerin 12.5%, phenol 1.25% and lidocaine 0.25%. Wide variations were found in treatment protocols, such as dose, number of treatments and use of adjunct therapies. Most cohort studies were only of moderate quality and varied greatly in the substances injected and the use of co-interventions. Most clinical studies reported positive results such as decreased pain or disability, although differences between treatment and control groups did not always reach statistical significance. Commonly reported adverse reactions to this treatment include temporary postinjection pain and stiffness. A handful of more serious adverse events were reported in the 1950s and 1960s with stronger or unknown solutions. Conclusion Prolotherapy describes a variety of treatment approaches rather than a specific protocol. Results from clinical studies published to date indicate that it may be effective at reducing spinal pain. Great variation was found in the injection and treatment protocols used in these studies that preclude definite conclusions. Future research should focus on those solutions and protocols that are most commonly used in clinical practice and have been used in trials reporting effectiveness to help determine which patients, if any, are most likely to benefit from this treatment." @default.
• W2105063886 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2105063886 creator A5014635573 @default.
• W2105063886 creator A5017586301 @default.
• W2105063886 creator A5037226361 @default.
• W2105063886 date "2005-05-01" @default.
• W2105063886 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2105063886 title "Intraligamentous injection of sclerosing solutions (prolotherapy) for spinal pain: a critical review of the literature" @default.
• W2105063886 cites W1992679340 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W1994719902 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W1996260617 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2002300955 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2007392572 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2008484885 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2012623547 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2020536961 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2021227979 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2027514065 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2028694229 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2041285751 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2046548607 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2053671205 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2054702937 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2074783883 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2076519050 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2077775065 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2087207974 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2087949260 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2092022519 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2093568809 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2093610280 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2099785572 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2099901505 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2101789332 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2102849083 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2109436592 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2147991584 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2150030430 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2154907315 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W239751811 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2398359914 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2406927861 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2412849363 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2461552830 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2462849018 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2466472147 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2467940908 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2470849849 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2474144457 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2475908142 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2481844736 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2486493643 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2492932973 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2504453019 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2505649043 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2506911465 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2514342529 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2561177209 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2561316893 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2567669169 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2887204199 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W3006641047 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W4235111389 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W4242953408 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W4249180703 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W4249794616 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W4327847545 @default.
• W2105063886 cites W2049786305 @default.
• W2105063886 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.09.011" @default.
• W2105063886 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15863087" @default.
• W2105063886 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2105063886 type Work @default.
• W2105063886 sameAs 2105063886 @default.
• W2105063886 citedByCount "56" @default.
• W2105063886 countsByYear W21050638862012 @default.
• W2105063886 countsByYear W21050638862013 @default.
• W2105063886 countsByYear W21050638862014 @default.
• W2105063886 countsByYear W21050638862015 @default.
• W2105063886 countsByYear W21050638862016 @default.
• W2105063886 countsByYear W21050638862017 @default.
• W2105063886 countsByYear W21050638862019 @default.
• W2105063886 countsByYear W21050638862020 @default.
• W2105063886 countsByYear W21050638862021 @default.
• W2105063886 countsByYear W21050638862022 @default.
• W2105063886 countsByYear W21050638862023 @default.
• W2105063886 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2105063886 hasAuthorship W2105063886A5014635573 @default.
• W2105063886 hasAuthorship W2105063886A5017586301 @default.
• W2105063886 hasAuthorship W2105063886A5037226361 @default.
• W2105063886 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2105063886 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2105063886 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2105063886 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2105063886 hasConcept C152541439 @default.
• W2105063886 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2105063886 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2105063886 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2105063886 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.

• next