FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2105621447> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2105621447 endingPage "686" @default.
• W2105621447 startingPage "680" @default.
• W2105621447 abstract "Objectives. This study sought to assess the impact of myocardial perfusion studies on subsequent management in the very elderly with respect to referral to catheterization or revascularization. Background. The very elderly are a rapidly growing segment of the U.S. population, and myocardial perfusion studies are frequently performed in this patient subset for evaluation of coronary artery disease. Methods. The study utilized 1,006 consecutive patients ≥ 80 years old (511 men, 495 women) who underwent stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using pharmacologic stress (n = 605) or treadmill exercise (n = 401). Referral to catheterization or revascularization within 60 days of the nuclear scan was correlated with clinical and nuclear variables. Results. Catheterization and revascularization were performed in 119 and 77 patients, respectively. Stratification of referral rates showed a low rate in normal and mildly abnormal scan categories and significantly higher rates in patients with severely abnormal scan results irrespective of the presenting symptoms or pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease. Multiple logistic regression analysis of clinical and nuclear variables revealed that extent and severity of reversibility by SPECT and the final scan result were the two most powerful predictors of referral to catheterization and revascularization in men and women (catheterization: chi-square 65 and 78; revascularization: chi-square 37 and 68, respectively). Overall, referral rates to catheterization and revascularization were similar in men and women (catheterization: 13% vs. 11%; revascularization: 8% vs. 8%, respectively). However, women with severely abnormal scan results were more frequently referred to catheterization (28% vs. 18%, p < 0.03) and revascularization (21% vs. 12%, p < 0.01) than men. Conclusions. In patients ≥ 80 years old, myocardial perfusion SPECT had a significant impact on patient management. The apparent discrepancy in referal rates for interventional management in men and women is unexplained but may be appropriate in light of our previous observations that women with severely abnormal scan results are at increased risk for hard cardiac events than are men with severely abnormal scan results." @default.
• W2105621447 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2105621447 creator A5003520617 @default.
• W2105621447 creator A5015456000 @default.
• W2105621447 creator A5028438824 @default.
• W2105621447 creator A5041497560 @default.
• W2105621447 creator A5062520509 @default.
• W2105621447 creator A5080498110 @default.
• W2105621447 date "1996-09-01" @default.
• W2105621447 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2105621447 title "Impact of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography on referral to catheterization of the very elderly Is there evidence of gender-related referral bias?" @default.
• W2105621447 cites W1967861711 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W1998285493 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2002607089 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2003588391 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2024951927 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2026936122 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2029804139 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2036442606 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2040000825 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2056362996 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2058028280 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2068174105 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2072454650 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2084716436 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2142506456 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2312496054 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2331499127 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2333765518 @default.
• W2105621447 cites W2334748255 @default.
• W2105621447 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(96)00200-8" @default.
• W2105621447 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8772756" @default.
• W2105621447 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2105621447 type Work @default.
• W2105621447 sameAs 2105621447 @default.
• W2105621447 citedByCount "37" @default.
• W2105621447 countsByYear W21056214472012 @default.
• W2105621447 countsByYear W21056214472016 @default.
• W2105621447 countsByYear W21056214472017 @default.
• W2105621447 countsByYear W21056214472020 @default.
• W2105621447 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2105621447 hasAuthorship W2105621447A5003520617 @default.
• W2105621447 hasAuthorship W2105621447A5015456000 @default.
• W2105621447 hasAuthorship W2105621447A5028438824 @default.
• W2105621447 hasAuthorship W2105621447A5041497560 @default.
• W2105621447 hasAuthorship W2105621447A5062520509 @default.
• W2105621447 hasAuthorship W2105621447A5080498110 @default.
• W2105621447 hasBestOaLocation W21056214471 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C135691158 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C146957229 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C2776135927 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C2777385415 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C2778405248 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C2780441642 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C126322002 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C126838900 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C135691158 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C146957229 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C164705383 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C2776135927 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C2777385415 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C2778213512 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C2778405248 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C2779464278 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C2780441642 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C500558357 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C512399662 @default.
• W2105621447 hasConceptScore W2105621447C71924100 @default.
• W2105621447 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2105621447 hasLocation W21056214471 @default.
• W2105621447 hasLocation W21056214472 @default.
• W2105621447 hasOpenAccess W2105621447 @default.
• W2105621447 hasPrimaryLocation W21056214471 @default.
• W2105621447 hasRelatedWork W123886844 @default.
• W2105621447 hasRelatedWork W1992404996 @default.
• W2105621447 hasRelatedWork W2021450328 @default.
• W2105621447 hasRelatedWork W2039180416 @default.
• W2105621447 hasRelatedWork W2042121835 @default.
• W2105621447 hasRelatedWork W2321182487 @default.
• W2105621447 hasRelatedWork W2370490441 @default.
• W2105621447 hasRelatedWork W2795319685 @default.
• W2105621447 hasRelatedWork W3189843545 @default.
• W2105621447 hasRelatedWork W4255450024 @default.
• W2105621447 hasVolume "28" @default.
• W2105621447 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2105621447 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2105621447 magId "2105621447" @default.
• W2105621447 workType "article" @default.