FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2105646535> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2105646535 endingPage "434" @default.
• W2105646535 startingPage "431" @default.
• W2105646535 abstract "Introduction The prevalence of fatigue following stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) is disputed, with prevalences ranging from 30% to 72% reported. We hypothesized that methods and descriptors used may substantially affect the prevalence reported. Methods Subjects completed validated assessments of fatigue and sleepiness (the Fatigue Severity Scale [FSS] and Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) as well as 5-point Likert scores on frequency of symptoms using the 5 statements of fatigue derived from patient interviews. Results Among the 91 subjects, the mean FSS score was 3.8. FSS score correlated more strongly with the statement “I have a lack of energy” (r=0.470; ρ <0.001; Spearman's rho) than with the statement “I feel physical fatigue” (r=0.349; ρ=0.001). The statement “I have a lack of energy” also produced the highest prevalence of severe symptoms, with 37% agreeing that they had the symptom “often” or “always.” Agreement between Likert scales was only fair, the best being that for “I have a lack of energy” and “I feel physical fatigue” (κ=0.50). There was a gender difference in simple expression of fatigue, with the statement “I feel physical fatigue” correlating strongly with FSS score in males (r=0.61; ρ<0.001) but not correlating in females (r=0.039; ρ=0.29). Depending on which definition of fatigue was used, the prevalence of fatigue varied between 13% and 63%. FSS score correlated weakly with ESS score (r=0.287; ρ=0.008). Our data indicate significant variation in the prevalence of fatigue among subjects with stroke and transient ischemic attack depending on the descriptors and methods used to define it. Conclusion There is a significant difference between the genders in how fatigue is expressed. The prevalence of fatigue following stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) is disputed, with prevalences ranging from 30% to 72% reported. We hypothesized that methods and descriptors used may substantially affect the prevalence reported. Subjects completed validated assessments of fatigue and sleepiness (the Fatigue Severity Scale [FSS] and Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) as well as 5-point Likert scores on frequency of symptoms using the 5 statements of fatigue derived from patient interviews. Among the 91 subjects, the mean FSS score was 3.8. FSS score correlated more strongly with the statement “I have a lack of energy” (r=0.470; ρ <0.001; Spearman's rho) than with the statement “I feel physical fatigue” (r=0.349; ρ=0.001). The statement “I have a lack of energy” also produced the highest prevalence of severe symptoms, with 37% agreeing that they had the symptom “often” or “always.” Agreement between Likert scales was only fair, the best being that for “I have a lack of energy” and “I feel physical fatigue” (κ=0.50). There was a gender difference in simple expression of fatigue, with the statement “I feel physical fatigue” correlating strongly with FSS score in males (r=0.61; ρ<0.001) but not correlating in females (r=0.039; ρ=0.29). Depending on which definition of fatigue was used, the prevalence of fatigue varied between 13% and 63%. FSS score correlated weakly with ESS score (r=0.287; ρ=0.008). Our data indicate significant variation in the prevalence of fatigue among subjects with stroke and transient ischemic attack depending on the descriptors and methods used to define it. There is a significant difference between the genders in how fatigue is expressed." @default.
• W2105646535 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2105646535 creator A5026024722 @default.
• W2105646535 creator A5063353371 @default.
• W2105646535 creator A5079807430 @default.
• W2105646535 date "2010-11-01" @default.
• W2105646535 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2105646535 title "Estimated Prevalence of Fatigue Following Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Is Dependent on Terminology Used and Patient Gender" @default.
• W2105646535 cites W1572714703 @default.
• W2105646535 cites W1987358702 @default.
• W2105646535 cites W1991724665 @default.
• W2105646535 cites W2004232121 @default.
• W2105646535 cites W2019607509 @default.
• W2105646535 cites W2025144159 @default.
• W2105646535 cites W2041468347 @default.
• W2105646535 cites W2048739840 @default.
• W2105646535 cites W2067505687 @default.
• W2105646535 cites W2114242035 @default.
• W2105646535 cites W2128366371 @default.
• W2105646535 cites W2146987954 @default.
• W2105646535 cites W2151866555 @default.
• W2105646535 cites W2328234520 @default.
• W2105646535 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.07.017" @default.
• W2105646535 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20472462" @default.
• W2105646535 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2105646535 type Work @default.
• W2105646535 sameAs 2105646535 @default.
• W2105646535 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W2105646535 countsByYear W21056465352012 @default.
• W2105646535 countsByYear W21056465352013 @default.
• W2105646535 countsByYear W21056465352015 @default.
• W2105646535 countsByYear W21056465352016 @default.
• W2105646535 countsByYear W21056465352017 @default.
• W2105646535 countsByYear W21056465352019 @default.
• W2105646535 countsByYear W21056465352021 @default.
• W2105646535 countsByYear W21056465352022 @default.
• W2105646535 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2105646535 hasAuthorship W2105646535A5026024722 @default.
• W2105646535 hasAuthorship W2105646535A5063353371 @default.
• W2105646535 hasAuthorship W2105646535A5079807430 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConcept C2777026412 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConceptScore W2105646535C105776082 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConceptScore W2105646535C126322002 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConceptScore W2105646535C127413603 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConceptScore W2105646535C138496976 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConceptScore W2105646535C15744967 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConceptScore W2105646535C17744445 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConceptScore W2105646535C1862650 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConceptScore W2105646535C199539241 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConceptScore W2105646535C2777026412 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConceptScore W2105646535C2780645631 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConceptScore W2105646535C71924100 @default.
• W2105646535 hasConceptScore W2105646535C78519656 @default.
• W2105646535 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2105646535 hasLocation W21056465351 @default.
• W2105646535 hasLocation W21056465352 @default.
• W2105646535 hasOpenAccess W2105646535 @default.
• W2105646535 hasPrimaryLocation W21056465351 @default.
• W2105646535 hasRelatedWork W1789857725 @default.
• W2105646535 hasRelatedWork W2020547815 @default.
• W2105646535 hasRelatedWork W2049567231 @default.
• W2105646535 hasRelatedWork W2282635033 @default.
• W2105646535 hasRelatedWork W2427776549 @default.
• W2105646535 hasRelatedWork W2884234055 @default.
• W2105646535 hasRelatedWork W3095003771 @default.
• W2105646535 hasRelatedWork W3144789910 @default.
• W2105646535 hasRelatedWork W4895778 @default.
• W2105646535 hasRelatedWork W620660060 @default.
• W2105646535 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W2105646535 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2105646535 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2105646535 magId "2105646535" @default.
• W2105646535 workType "article" @default.