FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2105863657> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2105863657 endingPage "1053" @default.
• W2105863657 startingPage "1043" @default.
• W2105863657 abstract "Background Free flap breast reconstruction (BR) is generally believed to be more expensive than implant BR, but costs were previously shown to level out over time due to complications and re-operations. The aim of this study was to assess the economic implications of four BR techniques: silicone prosthesis (SP), implant preceded by tissue expansion (TE/SP), latissimus dorsi transposition with or without implant (LD±SP) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Methods A prospective historic cohort study was performed to evaluate intramural medical costs in 427 patients, who had undergone BR between 2002 and 2009. Short- and medium-term complications were incorporated. In addition, 58 patients, who had recently undergone BR, participated in a questionnaire study to prospectively evaluate extramural medical and non-medical costs. Estimates of mean short- and medium-term costs are presented per patient. Results Intramural medical costs for BR and short-term complications for unilateral DIEP flaps (€12,848) and TE/SP reconstructions (€12,400) were significantly higher than those for LD±SP reconstructions (€5804), which, in turn, were more expensive than SP reconstructions (€4731). In bilateral cases, costs of TE/SP (€12,723) and LD±SP (€10,760) reconstructions were comparable, while DIEP flaps (€15,747) were significantly more expensive and SP reconstructions were significantly cheaper (€6784). Overall, the medium-term costs for complications and additional operations were not significantly different (€3017–€4503). Extramural medical costs and non-medical costs were approximately €9300 per stage, regardless of technique. Conclusions Differences in short-term costs between techniques did not level out during follow-up and SP reconstructions remained least expensive. Single-stage SP reconstructions, however, are not suitable for all patients due to high complication rates. Definite implant placement is therefore increasingly preceded by tissue expansion at more comparable costs to autologous BR. Incorporation of non-medical costs into the cost analysis would render two-stage procedures more costly than autologous BR. To achieve the optimal result, careful patient selection is critical. Only in select cases where two options are equally applicable, cost comparison becomes a valid argument for treatment selection." @default.
• W2105863657 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2105863657 creator A5000498171 @default.
• W2105863657 creator A5009171234 @default.
• W2105863657 creator A5018120485 @default.
• W2105863657 creator A5068551112 @default.
• W2105863657 creator A5078540848 @default.
• W2105863657 creator A5080381120 @default.
• W2105863657 creator A5083170125 @default.
• W2105863657 creator A5090287563 @default.
• W2105863657 date "2011-08-01" @default.
• W2105863657 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2105863657 title "Medium-term cost analysis of breast reconstructions in a single Dutch centre: A comparison of implants, implants preceded by tissue expansion, LD transpositions and DIEP flaps" @default.
• W2105863657 cites W1963781125 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W1965359244 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W1966969941 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W1968804896 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W1981351216 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W1987365087 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W1988082513 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W1990302538 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W1994016813 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W2003274015 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W2015868879 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W2024113562 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W2027720140 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W2029745960 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W2036191107 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W2054046021 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W2058522744 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W2079431822 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W2080932913 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W2082180606 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W2127378653 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W2132417339 @default.
• W2105863657 cites W4239961624 @default.
• W2105863657 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.12.028" @default.
• W2105863657 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21317054" @default.
• W2105863657 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2105863657 type Work @default.
• W2105863657 sameAs 2105863657 @default.
• W2105863657 citedByCount "46" @default.
• W2105863657 countsByYear W21058636572012 @default.
• W2105863657 countsByYear W21058636572013 @default.
• W2105863657 countsByYear W21058636572014 @default.
• W2105863657 countsByYear W21058636572015 @default.
• W2105863657 countsByYear W21058636572016 @default.
• W2105863657 countsByYear W21058636572017 @default.
• W2105863657 countsByYear W21058636572019 @default.
• W2105863657 countsByYear W21058636572020 @default.
• W2105863657 countsByYear W21058636572021 @default.
• W2105863657 countsByYear W21058636572022 @default.
• W2105863657 countsByYear W21058636572023 @default.
• W2105863657 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2105863657 hasAuthorship W2105863657A5000498171 @default.
• W2105863657 hasAuthorship W2105863657A5009171234 @default.
• W2105863657 hasAuthorship W2105863657A5018120485 @default.
• W2105863657 hasAuthorship W2105863657A5068551112 @default.
• W2105863657 hasAuthorship W2105863657A5078540848 @default.
• W2105863657 hasAuthorship W2105863657A5080381120 @default.
• W2105863657 hasAuthorship W2105863657A5083170125 @default.
• W2105863657 hasAuthorship W2105863657A5090287563 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C2778715743 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C2779628157 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C2781001896 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C2781037480 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C2983335822 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C3019354653 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C121608353 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C126322002 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C127413603 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C141071460 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C160735492 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C162324750 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C188816634 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C200601418 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C2778715743 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C2779628157 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C2781001896 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C2781037480 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C2781411149 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C2983335822 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C3019354653 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C50522688 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C530470458 @default.
• W2105863657 hasConceptScore W2105863657C71924100 @default.

• next