FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2106264268> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2106264268 endingPage "445" @default.
• W2106264268 startingPage "441" @default.
• W2106264268 abstract "<h3>Background:</h3> Increasing interest in empirical ethics has enhanced understanding of healthcare professionals’ ethical problems and attendant decision-making. A four-stage decision-making model involving ethical attention, reasoning, intention and action offers further insights into how more than reasoning alone may contribute to decision-making. <h3>Aims:</h3> To explore how the four-stage model can increase understanding of decision-making in healthcare and describe the decision-making of an under-researched professional group. <h3>Methods:</h3> 23 purposively sampled UK community pharmacists were asked, in semi-structured interviews, to describe ethical problems in their work and how they were resolved. Framework analysis of transcribed interviews utilised the four decision-making stages, together with constant comparative methods and deviant-case analysis. <h3>Results:</h3> Pharmacists were often inattentive and constructed problems in legal terms. Ethical reasoning was limited, but examples of appeals to consequences, the golden rule, religious faith and common-sense experience emerged. Ethical intention was compromised by frequent concern about legal prosecution. Ethical inaction was common, typified by pharmacists’ failure to report healthcare professionals’ bad practices, and ethical passivity emerged to describe these negative examples of the four decision-making stages. Pharmacists occasionally described more ethically active decision-making, but this often involved ethical uncertainty. <h3>Discussion:</h3> The four decision-making stages are a useful tool in considering how healthcare professionals try to resolve ethical problems in practice. They reveal processes often ignored in normative theories, and their recognition and the emergence of ethical passivity indicates the complexity of decision-making in practice. Ethical passivity may be deleterious to patients’ welfare, and concerns emerge about improving pharmacists’ ethical training and promoting ethical awareness and responsibility." @default.
• W2106264268 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2106264268 creator A5030831195 @default.
• W2106264268 creator A5044837898 @default.
• W2106264268 creator A5054318382 @default.
• W2106264268 date "2008-06-01" @default.
• W2106264268 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2106264268 title "Ethical decision-making, passivity and pharmacy" @default.
• W2106264268 cites W119429051 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W138047100 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W1544053287 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W1558600619 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W1761168231 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W1793883808 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W1964955322 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W1981040297 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W1985443303 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W1987493337 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W2045403074 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W2047213184 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W2056546147 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W2087851324 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W2104253362 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W2124077410 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W2124561828 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W2150908642 @default.
• W2106264268 cites W581714837 @default.
• W2106264268 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2007.022624" @default.
• W2106264268 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18511616" @default.
• W2106264268 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2106264268 type Work @default.
• W2106264268 sameAs 2106264268 @default.
• W2106264268 citedByCount "42" @default.
• W2106264268 countsByYear W21062642682012 @default.
• W2106264268 countsByYear W21062642682013 @default.
• W2106264268 countsByYear W21062642682014 @default.
• W2106264268 countsByYear W21062642682015 @default.
• W2106264268 countsByYear W21062642682016 @default.
• W2106264268 countsByYear W21062642682017 @default.
• W2106264268 countsByYear W21062642682018 @default.
• W2106264268 countsByYear W21062642682019 @default.
• W2106264268 countsByYear W21062642682020 @default.
• W2106264268 countsByYear W21062642682021 @default.
• W2106264268 countsByYear W21062642682022 @default.
• W2106264268 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2106264268 hasAuthorship W2106264268A5030831195 @default.
• W2106264268 hasAuthorship W2106264268A5044837898 @default.
• W2106264268 hasAuthorship W2106264268A5054318382 @default.
• W2106264268 hasBestOaLocation W21062642682 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C104863432 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C2776768071 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C68122502 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C104863432 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C121332964 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C127413603 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C142724271 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C15744967 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C159110408 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C160735492 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C162324750 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C17744445 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C199539241 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C204787440 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C2776768071 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C2780791683 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C44725695 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C539667460 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C55587333 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C62520636 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C68122502 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C71924100 @default.
• W2106264268 hasConceptScore W2106264268C77805123 @default.
• W2106264268 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2106264268 hasLocation W21062642681 @default.
• W2106264268 hasLocation W21062642682 @default.
• W2106264268 hasLocation W21062642683 @default.
• W2106264268 hasOpenAccess W2106264268 @default.
• W2106264268 hasPrimaryLocation W21062642681 @default.
• W2106264268 hasRelatedWork W1999915459 @default.
• W2106264268 hasRelatedWork W2016301858 @default.
• W2106264268 hasRelatedWork W2101980082 @default.

• next