FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2106363945> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2106363945 endingPage "495" @default.
• W2106363945 startingPage "492" @default.
• W2106363945 abstract "Background Central line–associated bloodstream infections occur commonly and are a potentially preventable source of morbidity in the critical care setting. The purpose of this study was to find a way to decrease central line–associated bloodstream infections. Methods Data were collected from February 1, 2005, to April 31, 2007, on all patients in the critical care unit who had a central venous catheter placed at New York Methodist Hospital in Brooklyn, which is a community teaching hospital with 628 beds. After 5 months of baseline data collection, a multidisciplinary team created a central line bundle to be used when placing central venous catheters. A bundle is a protocol put in place to ensure that a procedure is performed using the latest evidence-based techniques. In this case, it included maximal barrier precautions, hand washing, skin preparation with ChloraPrep (Enturia, Leawood, Kan), use of a central line cart, and avoidance of femoral lines. All central lines placed from the time of intervention were placed using the bundle provided. The variables included the number of central lines, number of central line days, and development of a line infection. Results The study period was 24 months, which included 9,938 central line days from a total of 1,395 central venous catheters. The average number of central line–associated bloodstream infections per 1000 catheter days decreased from 5.0 to 0.90 (P < .001) after the bundle intervention was initiated. Conclusion The implementation of a central line bundle campaign resulted in a significant decrease in line-associated bloodstream infections. Based on our study, we recommend that this protocol be adopted nationwide. Central line–associated bloodstream infections occur commonly and are a potentially preventable source of morbidity in the critical care setting. The purpose of this study was to find a way to decrease central line–associated bloodstream infections. Data were collected from February 1, 2005, to April 31, 2007, on all patients in the critical care unit who had a central venous catheter placed at New York Methodist Hospital in Brooklyn, which is a community teaching hospital with 628 beds. After 5 months of baseline data collection, a multidisciplinary team created a central line bundle to be used when placing central venous catheters. A bundle is a protocol put in place to ensure that a procedure is performed using the latest evidence-based techniques. In this case, it included maximal barrier precautions, hand washing, skin preparation with ChloraPrep (Enturia, Leawood, Kan), use of a central line cart, and avoidance of femoral lines. All central lines placed from the time of intervention were placed using the bundle provided. The variables included the number of central lines, number of central line days, and development of a line infection. The study period was 24 months, which included 9,938 central line days from a total of 1,395 central venous catheters. The average number of central line–associated bloodstream infections per 1000 catheter days decreased from 5.0 to 0.90 (P < .001) after the bundle intervention was initiated. The implementation of a central line bundle campaign resulted in a significant decrease in line-associated bloodstream infections. Based on our study, we recommend that this protocol be adopted nationwide." @default.
• W2106363945 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2106363945 creator A5026053783 @default.
• W2106363945 creator A5031465664 @default.
• W2106363945 creator A5037126579 @default.
• W2106363945 creator A5037924544 @default.
• W2106363945 creator A5041886542 @default.
• W2106363945 date "2008-10-01" @default.
• W2106363945 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2106363945 title "Effectiveness of a central line bundle campaign on line-associated infections in the intensive care unit" @default.
• W2106363945 cites W206580140 @default.
• W2106363945 cites W2083100221 @default.
• W2106363945 cites W2159078156 @default.
• W2106363945 cites W2781474784 @default.
• W2106363945 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.004" @default.
• W2106363945 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18847630" @default.
• W2106363945 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2106363945 type Work @default.
• W2106363945 sameAs 2106363945 @default.
• W2106363945 citedByCount "85" @default.
• W2106363945 countsByYear W21063639452012 @default.
• W2106363945 countsByYear W21063639452013 @default.
• W2106363945 countsByYear W21063639452014 @default.
• W2106363945 countsByYear W21063639452015 @default.
• W2106363945 countsByYear W21063639452016 @default.
• W2106363945 countsByYear W21063639452017 @default.
• W2106363945 countsByYear W21063639452018 @default.
• W2106363945 countsByYear W21063639452019 @default.
• W2106363945 countsByYear W21063639452020 @default.
• W2106363945 countsByYear W21063639452021 @default.
• W2106363945 countsByYear W21063639452022 @default.
• W2106363945 countsByYear W21063639452023 @default.
• W2106363945 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2106363945 hasAuthorship W2106363945A5026053783 @default.
• W2106363945 hasAuthorship W2106363945A5031465664 @default.
• W2106363945 hasAuthorship W2106363945A5037126579 @default.
• W2106363945 hasAuthorship W2106363945A5037924544 @default.
• W2106363945 hasAuthorship W2106363945A5041886542 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConcept C166888038 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConcept C2776376669 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConcept C2778134712 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConcept C2778446481 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConcept C2781267111 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConcept C3018946976 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConcept C78221805 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConceptScore W2106363945C141071460 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConceptScore W2106363945C159985019 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConceptScore W2106363945C166888038 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConceptScore W2106363945C177713679 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConceptScore W2106363945C192562407 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConceptScore W2106363945C194828623 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConceptScore W2106363945C2776376669 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConceptScore W2106363945C2778134712 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConceptScore W2106363945C2778446481 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConceptScore W2106363945C2781267111 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConceptScore W2106363945C3018946976 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConceptScore W2106363945C71924100 @default.
• W2106363945 hasConceptScore W2106363945C78221805 @default.
• W2106363945 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2106363945 hasLocation W21063639451 @default.
• W2106363945 hasLocation W21063639452 @default.
• W2106363945 hasOpenAccess W2106363945 @default.
• W2106363945 hasPrimaryLocation W21063639451 @default.
• W2106363945 hasRelatedWork W2041081489 @default.
• W2106363945 hasRelatedWork W2094492575 @default.
• W2106363945 hasRelatedWork W2099739702 @default.
• W2106363945 hasRelatedWork W2358304568 @default.
• W2106363945 hasRelatedWork W2399844530 @default.
• W2106363945 hasRelatedWork W2733253002 @default.
• W2106363945 hasRelatedWork W2982207500 @default.
• W2106363945 hasRelatedWork W3009098191 @default.
• W2106363945 hasRelatedWork W4220883006 @default.
• W2106363945 hasRelatedWork W91100873 @default.
• W2106363945 hasVolume "144" @default.
• W2106363945 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2106363945 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2106363945 magId "2106363945" @default.
• W2106363945 workType "article" @default.