Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2106425473> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2106425473 endingPage "275" @default.
- W2106425473 startingPage "249" @default.
- W2106425473 abstract "Tonal Cues and Uncertain Values:Affect and Ethics in Mrs. Dalloway Molly Hite (bio) One important kind of literary criticism involved in the ethical turn describes and theorizes the ethical relations that readers perceive among characters or between characters and the narrator.1 My interest in such value structures within a literary text, however, begins from an issue still rarely treated. I am concerned with experimental narratives with third-person narrators who deliberately make it difficult for readers to discern what evaluative stance they are supposed to have toward characters, events, or descriptions.2 In Virginia Woolf's middle-period fiction, the narrator's tonal cues within the text are frequently contradictory, inconclusive, or simply absent. By tonal cues I mean textual markers that prompt readers to have one affective response rather than another—a response like sympathy, condescension, irritation, suspicion, approval—and to make conscious or unconscious evaluations accordingly: a character is good, pompous, or inferior; a passage of dialogue or indirect discourse is misleading, pretentious, or to the point. In the fiction that interests me here, third-person narrators give conflicting or insufficient guidance about whether a character is admirable or trustworthy or about whether a passage in the narrative voice or an utterance by a character should be regarded seriously or ironically. In Peter Rabinowitz's terms, readers lack the wherewithal to make snap moral judgments, a loss that makes moral judgment puzzling and thus important to the process of reading (Rabinowitz 84–93). Mrs. Dalloway, one of the most beloved of Woolf's novels, is also one of the most experimental in terms of the values its third-person narrator complicates or withholds. Its affective indeterminacy leaves elements of the story open to different responses, and these responses cue conscious or unconscious judgments.3 For [End Page 249] instance, to like a character (find him or her sympathetic) is generally to attribute positive qualities to that character, even if these qualities are not immediately perceived as ethically positive. As a consequence, Mrs. Dalloway has a history of strikingly divergent interpretations that conflict on the value and role assigned to the title character, the nature of the climactic scene, and the attitude readers should have toward the second, shadow protagonist, Septimus Smith. These questions of evaluation arise in the context of perhaps the largest ethical-political question of the twentieth century, egalitarianism. Woolf's ambiguous tonal cues engage this question by stressing both its urgency and its resistance to being understood, much less practiced. Rebecca Walkowitz observes that modernists sought to imagine models of social critique that would resist social codification (80). By using third-person narrators who provide insufficient or contradictory tonal cues, Woolf enabled an intense concern with social categories without allowing attentive readers to slot narratorial observations into overall judgments of admiration or censure. Rather than raising more usual questions in experimental fiction about the truth or reality of a represented situation or action (McHale, Postmodernist 3–25), Mrs. Dalloway traffics in affective uncertainty, leaving readers unclear how to feel about—or take—descriptions and utterances and, ultimately, events and characters. My use of take here invokes the colloquial American sense of having an attitude, or generally feeling about, as in I don't know how to take his jokes. Note that in this instance of taking someone's jokes the speaker expresses both cognitive and affective confusion. In terms of affect, this confusion might lay out an array of possible responses to the joke-teller without clearly favoring any one of them. The possible responses might include humiliation at feeling oneself mocked, offense at the rejection of a value that the listener had assumed was shared with the joker, or ridicule of the inadequacies of the telling. I suggest that one radically experimental effect of Woolf's middle-period fiction arises from a calculated refusing or perplexing of authoritative directions that would enable readers to take crucial elements of her narrative discourse: to assign what they perceive to be authorially sanctioned feelings and thus values to the main events and characters.4 James Phelan has observed that tone is a quality of narrative voice that indicates the attitude a speaker has toward her..." @default.
- W2106425473 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2106425473 creator A5079413425 @default.
- W2106425473 date "2010-01-01" @default.
- W2106425473 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2106425473 title "Tonal Cues and Uncertain Values: Affect and Ethics in <i>Mrs. Dalloway</i>" @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1480842047 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1480847064 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1482940133 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1491229434 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1494855612 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1516829637 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1519886599 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1525376619 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1530325852 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1530928181 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1538942742 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1540300011 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1553860104 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1566384204 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1578203948 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1578980726 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1585910012 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1588038912 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1601256388 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1635503449 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1974251467 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W1993072379 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2006973183 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2019487537 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2021925790 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2041430213 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2058683638 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2061049522 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2065804895 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2068159155 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2072352713 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2080237399 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2086468584 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2088878250 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2090926768 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2094327970 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2117227319 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2125821178 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2131323289 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2138796668 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2164867600 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W219207701 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2319111308 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2322546290 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2327952553 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2594254035 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W2796423899 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W3095933175 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W3132132780 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W46539433 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W575318802 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W577964394 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W578761614 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W589322336 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W590775160 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W597024182 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W625344756 @default.
- W2106425473 cites W649266090 @default.
- W2106425473 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2010.0003" @default.
- W2106425473 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2106425473 type Work @default.
- W2106425473 sameAs 2106425473 @default.
- W2106425473 citedByCount "19" @default.
- W2106425473 countsByYear W21064254732013 @default.
- W2106425473 countsByYear W21064254732014 @default.
- W2106425473 countsByYear W21064254732015 @default.
- W2106425473 countsByYear W21064254732016 @default.
- W2106425473 countsByYear W21064254732017 @default.
- W2106425473 countsByYear W21064254732021 @default.
- W2106425473 countsByYear W21064254732023 @default.
- W2106425473 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2106425473 hasAuthorship W2106425473A5079413425 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C115786838 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C2775852435 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C2779115301 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C2780861071 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
- W2106425473 hasConcept C554936623 @default.