FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2106595147> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2106595147 endingPage "e1001330" @default.
• W2106595147 startingPage "e1001330" @default.
• W2106595147 abstract "Background To minimize potential risk of intussusception, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended in 2009 that rotavirus immunization should be initiated by age 15 weeks and completed before 32 weeks. These restrictions could adversely impact vaccination coverage and thereby its health impact, particularly in developing countries where delays in vaccination often occur. Methods and Findings We conducted a modeling study to estimate the number of rotavirus deaths prevented and the number of intussusception deaths caused by vaccination when administered on the restricted schedule versus an unrestricted schedule whereby rotavirus vaccine would be administered with DTP vaccine up to age 3 years. Countries were grouped on the basis of child mortality rates, using WHO data. Inputs were estimates of WHO rotavirus mortality by week of age from a recent study, intussusception mortality based on a literature review, predicted vaccination rates by week of age from USAID Demographic and Health Surveys, the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS), and WHO-UNICEF 2010 country-specific coverage estimates, and published estimates of vaccine efficacy and vaccine-associated intussusception risk. On the basis of the error estimates and distributions for model inputs, we conducted 2,000 simulations to obtain median estimates of deaths averted and caused as well as the uncertainty ranges, defined as the 5th–95th percentile, to provide an indication of the uncertainty in the estimates. We estimated that in low and low-middle income countries a restricted schedule would prevent 155,800 rotavirus deaths (5th–95th centiles, 83,300–217,700) while causing potentially 253 intussusception deaths (76–689). In contrast, vaccination without age restrictions would prevent 203,000 rotavirus deaths (102,000–281,500) while potentially causing 547 intussusception deaths (237–1,160). Thus, removing the age restrictions would avert an additional 47,200 rotavirus deaths (18,700–63,700) and cause an additional 294 (161–471) intussusception deaths, for an incremental benefit-risk ratio of 154 deaths averted for every death caused by vaccine. These extra deaths prevented under an unrestricted schedule reflect vaccination of an additional 21%–25% children, beyond the 63%–73% of the children who would be vaccinated under the restricted schedule. Importantly, these estimates err on the side of safety in that they assume high vaccine-associated risk of intussusception and do not account for potential herd immunity or non-fatal outcomes. Conclusions Our analysis suggests that in low- and middle-income countries the additional lives saved by removing age restrictions for rotavirus vaccination would far outnumber the potential excess vaccine-associated intussusception deaths. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary" @default.
• W2106595147 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2106595147 creator A5033151792 @default.
• W2106595147 creator A5050444974 @default.
• W2106595147 creator A5054966986 @default.
• W2106595147 creator A5061848201 @default.
• W2106595147 creator A5087750390 @default.
• W2106595147 date "2012-10-23" @default.
• W2106595147 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2106595147 title "Removing the Age Restrictions for Rotavirus Vaccination: A Benefit-Risk Modeling Analysis" @default.
• W2106595147 cites W1964909819 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W1969410538 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W1973672232 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W1973756584 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W1977727222 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W1986829459 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W1992990024 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W1994632625 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2000828436 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2007480430 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2007918590 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2012232727 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2024469729 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2035064373 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2037011441 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2041786026 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2041857234 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2042592962 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2047097961 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2048472650 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2048796368 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2050844412 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2055735989 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2061374669 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2063149793 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2068533923 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2072236708 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2078803073 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2081808247 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2086835390 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2089710044 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2091204316 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2092377849 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2093046702 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2100178369 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2101100687 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2104021077 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2113014022 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2117524023 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2119425767 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2126569882 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2131154800 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2134824452 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2135985984 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2136464308 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2136880322 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2141577125 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2143233237 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2144470605 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2151719649 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2162222042 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2163306701 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2170749337 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2171811843 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2322552488 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W2333762130 @default.
• W2106595147 cites W66338170 @default.
• W2106595147 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001330" @default.
• W2106595147 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3479108" @default.
• W2106595147 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23109915" @default.
• W2106595147 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2106595147 type Work @default.
• W2106595147 sameAs 2106595147 @default.
• W2106595147 citedByCount "65" @default.
• W2106595147 countsByYear W21065951472012 @default.
• W2106595147 countsByYear W21065951472013 @default.
• W2106595147 countsByYear W21065951472014 @default.
• W2106595147 countsByYear W21065951472015 @default.
• W2106595147 countsByYear W21065951472016 @default.
• W2106595147 countsByYear W21065951472017 @default.
• W2106595147 countsByYear W21065951472018 @default.
• W2106595147 countsByYear W21065951472019 @default.
• W2106595147 countsByYear W21065951472020 @default.
• W2106595147 countsByYear W21065951472021 @default.
• W2106595147 countsByYear W21065951472023 @default.
• W2106595147 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2106595147 hasAuthorship W2106595147A5033151792 @default.
• W2106595147 hasAuthorship W2106595147A5050444974 @default.
• W2106595147 hasAuthorship W2106595147A5054966986 @default.
• W2106595147 hasAuthorship W2106595147A5061848201 @default.
• W2106595147 hasAuthorship W2106595147A5087750390 @default.
• W2106595147 hasBestOaLocation W21065951471 @default.
• W2106595147 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2106595147 hasConcept C122048520 @default.
• W2106595147 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2106595147 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2106595147 hasConcept C147483822 @default.
• W2106595147 hasConcept C149923435 @default.

• next