FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2106853345> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2106853345 endingPage "167" @default.
• W2106853345 startingPage "159" @default.
• W2106853345 abstract "Despite their importance, there has been surprisingly little scholarly examination of the NAGC Pre-K --Grade 12 Gifted Program Standards (NAGC, 2008/2000; Landrum, Callahan, & Shaklee, 2001) since their publication a decade ago. As part of a larger study investigating the effectiveness of local policies developed within the framework of state law, we used a qualitative approach to examine the ‘minimum’ and ‘exemplary’ criteria from the Student Identification portion of these NAGC Standards. Through this process we developed a 27-item checklist, which we then used to evaluate 43 locally developed plans for identifying diverse gifted learners from one large state in the southeastern United States. Based on this experience, we identify the strengths and weaknesses that we encountered in using the Standards for this purpose. We provide the checklist items we developed, and we offer specific suggestions for how the Gifted Program Standards in their currently ongoing revision process might be made more user-friendly for practitioners to apply toward effective evaluation of gifted program documents. Putting the Research to Use Our experience in using the Student Identification portion of the NAGC Pre-K --Grade 12 Gifted Program Standards highlights some difficulties in using a national standards document directly to evaluate district-level program descriptions and policies. Specifically, we found three aspects that hindered the application of the Student Identification framework to the evaluation of local policies: 1) A standard identified as Exemplary could be met in some cases without first satisfying the Minimum requirement of the same numbered standard; 2) Some standards included more than one criterion within a single numbered standard, and district documents satisfied one but not all of these criteria; and 3) The lack of consensus on terminology led to the use of some words such as “screening” to mean different things in the NAGC Standards than in the district documents, while other terms were too broad (such as “culturally fair”) or too narrow to prove useful in evaluating plan quality. The responsibility for developing and implementing policies and procedures often rests at the local level. Consequently, we believe that practitioners will find a checklist such as the one we have developed and presented here to be a useful bridge between the language and aims of standards documents and the tangible goals of those who develop and implement policies within the framework of state rules. We suggest that the currently ongoing revisions to these NAGC Standards should consider our findings in the three areas described above, and we recommend continued support for the development of ancillary materials as has been provided for these and other national standards documents." @default.
• W2106853345 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2106853345 creator A5069154440 @default.
• W2106853345 creator A5075280724 @default.
• W2106853345 date "2010-03-03" @default.
• W2106853345 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2106853345 title "Putting Standards Into Practice: Evaluating the Utility of the NAGC Pre-K—Grade 12 Gifted Program Standards" @default.
• W2106853345 cites W1974623828 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W1977261236 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W1991411182 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W1995267787 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2010497434 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2016531460 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2018868433 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2021531035 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2024143156 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2026492671 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2036641149 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2057219905 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2076704986 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2092242511 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2092691309 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2130979995 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2138231182 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2142888293 @default.
• W2106853345 cites W2156861186 @default.
• W2106853345 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209356708" @default.
• W2106853345 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2106853345 type Work @default.
• W2106853345 sameAs 2106853345 @default.
• W2106853345 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2106853345 countsByYear W21068533452012 @default.
• W2106853345 countsByYear W21068533452014 @default.
• W2106853345 countsByYear W21068533452016 @default.
• W2106853345 countsByYear W21068533452017 @default.
• W2106853345 countsByYear W21068533452018 @default.
• W2106853345 countsByYear W21068533452019 @default.
• W2106853345 countsByYear W21068533452020 @default.
• W2106853345 countsByYear W21068533452021 @default.
• W2106853345 countsByYear W21068533452022 @default.
• W2106853345 countsByYear W21068533452023 @default.
• W2106853345 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2106853345 hasAuthorship W2106853345A5069154440 @default.
• W2106853345 hasAuthorship W2106853345A5075280724 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConcept C116834253 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConcept C184356942 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConcept C72564820 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConceptScore W2106853345C116834253 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConceptScore W2106853345C15744967 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConceptScore W2106853345C17744445 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConceptScore W2106853345C180747234 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConceptScore W2106853345C184356942 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConceptScore W2106853345C19417346 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConceptScore W2106853345C199539241 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConceptScore W2106853345C2779356329 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConceptScore W2106853345C509550671 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConceptScore W2106853345C59822182 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConceptScore W2106853345C71924100 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConceptScore W2106853345C72564820 @default.
• W2106853345 hasConceptScore W2106853345C86803240 @default.
• W2106853345 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2106853345 hasLocation W21068533451 @default.
• W2106853345 hasOpenAccess W2106853345 @default.
• W2106853345 hasPrimaryLocation W21068533451 @default.
• W2106853345 hasRelatedWork W1966950287 @default.
• W2106853345 hasRelatedWork W2014949682 @default.
• W2106853345 hasRelatedWork W2027671210 @default.
• W2106853345 hasRelatedWork W2105927007 @default.
• W2106853345 hasRelatedWork W2106853345 @default.
• W2106853345 hasRelatedWork W2165201473 @default.
• W2106853345 hasRelatedWork W2170557077 @default.
• W2106853345 hasRelatedWork W2590471860 @default.
• W2106853345 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2106853345 hasRelatedWork W4200434338 @default.
• W2106853345 hasVolume "54" @default.
• W2106853345 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2106853345 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2106853345 magId "2106853345" @default.
• W2106853345 workType "article" @default.