FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2107359887> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2107359887 endingPage "1055" @default.
• W2107359887 startingPage "1047" @default.
• W2107359887 abstract "We responded to the claim by Greenwald et al. (2005) that the management recommendations for the northern goshawk in the Southwestern United States (MRNG; Reynolds et al. 1992), a food web-based conservation plan that incorporated both northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) and multiple prey habitats, may be inadequate to protect goshawks. Greenwald et al. (2005) based this claim on their review of 12 telemetry studies of goshawk habitat selection and 5 nontelemetry studies of the effects of vegetation structure at the home range scale on goshawk nest occupancy and reproduction that appeared after the 1992 publication of the MRNG. Greenwald et al. (2005) summarized their review as showing that 1) goshawks were habitat specialists limited to forests with mature and old-growth structures including large trees, high canopy cover, multiple canopy layering, and abundant woody debris; 2) habitats were not selected on the basis of prey abundance and, therefore, managing for prey habitats diluted goshawk habitats; and 3) selection for openings, edges, and habitat diversity was inconclusive. Our review found that when the studies' respective authors pooled their radiotagged goshawks there were weak to strong selections for old forest structures. However, the studies also documented extensive variation in use of vegetation types and structures by individual goshawks; some avoided openings, edges, young forests, and old forests, whereas others selected for these characteristics. Additionally, by virtue of their wide geographic distribution, the studies showed that the focal populations themselves occurred in a variety of forest types, some with large structural differences. We found no evidence in Greenwald's et al. (2005) review that the MRNG are inadequate to protect goshawks. Rather, the studies reviewed by Greenwald et al. (2005), as well as many studies they missed, supported the MRNG. The suggestion of inadequacy by Greenwald et al. (2005) appeared rooted in misunderstandings of goshawk habitats described in the MRNG, a discounting of the extent of variation in vegetation structural and seral stages used by goshawks, a limited understanding of the extent to which prey limits goshawks, a failure to recognize the dynamic nature of forests, and an incomplete review of the literature. We believe the MRNG are adequate because they maximize the sustainable amount of mature and old forests in goshawk home ranges and specify the kinds and intermixtures of prey habitats within home ranges. Implementation of MRNG should reduce the likelihood that the availability of vegetation structures suited to goshawk nesting and foraging, as well as abundance and availability of prey, will limit goshawk nest occupancy and reproduction." @default.
• W2107359887 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2107359887 creator A5003513106 @default.
• W2107359887 creator A5010708139 @default.
• W2107359887 creator A5072398569 @default.
• W2107359887 date "2008-05-01" @default.
• W2107359887 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2107359887 title "Northern Goshawk Habitat: an Intersection of Science, Management, and Conservation" @default.
• W2107359887 cites W103749202 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W113575918 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W1528309322 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W1593725795 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W1715825481 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W1877601592 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W1918754331 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W1980691675 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W1990346358 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2046569438 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2054197847 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2056787461 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2071895128 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2073456066 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2074407311 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2082932087 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2095607697 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2097015864 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2107864203 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2121676237 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2126612480 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2137248971 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2139427406 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2144949114 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2152267927 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2155698870 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2167599769 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2168060500 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2277695228 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2316579138 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2328955582 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2332997482 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2462621599 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2595311184 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2615417218 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2621671556 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2622366767 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2763025845 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2883896571 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2949717697 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W3093770793 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W3093869271 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W3119768214 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W3141352808 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W315970743 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W6082885 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W613266452 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W63148931 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W855170712 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2464512777 @default.
• W2107359887 cites W2526498521 @default.
• W2107359887 doi "https://doi.org/10.2193/2007-131" @default.
• W2107359887 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2107359887 type Work @default.
• W2107359887 sameAs 2107359887 @default.
• W2107359887 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2107359887 countsByYear W21073598872012 @default.
• W2107359887 countsByYear W21073598872013 @default.
• W2107359887 countsByYear W21073598872014 @default.
• W2107359887 countsByYear W21073598872015 @default.
• W2107359887 countsByYear W21073598872016 @default.
• W2107359887 countsByYear W21073598872020 @default.
• W2107359887 countsByYear W21073598872023 @default.
• W2107359887 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2107359887 hasAuthorship W2107359887A5003513106 @default.
• W2107359887 hasAuthorship W2107359887A5010708139 @default.
• W2107359887 hasAuthorship W2107359887A5072398569 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C152630561 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C160331591 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C188382862 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C204323151 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C2776133958 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C2776764107 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C77077793 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConceptScore W2107359887C142724271 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConceptScore W2107359887C152630561 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConceptScore W2107359887C159985019 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConceptScore W2107359887C160331591 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConceptScore W2107359887C185933670 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConceptScore W2107359887C188382862 @default.
• W2107359887 hasConceptScore W2107359887C18903297 @default.

• next