FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2107612271> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2107612271 endingPage "961" @default.
• W2107612271 startingPage "930" @default.
• W2107612271 abstract "Purpose Noting the scarcity of complexity techniques applied to modelling social systems, this paper attempts to formulate a conceptual model of decision‐making behaviour within the information systems evaluation (ISE) task, against the backdrop of complexity theory. Design/methodology/approach Complexity theory places an emphasis on addressing how dynamic non‐linear systems can be represented and modelled utilising computational tools and techniques to draw out inherent system dynamics. In doing so, the use of fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM) and morphological analysis (MA) (hence a fuzzy‐morphological approach), is applied to empirical case study data, to elucidate the inherent behavioural and systems issues involved in ISE decision making within a British manufacturing organisation. Findings The paper presents results of applying a combined FCM and MA approach to modelling complexity within management decision making in the ISE task: both in terms of a cognitive map of the key decision criteria; a matrix of constraint criteria; and a synthesised model that provides an indication of the linkages between technology management factors and organisational imperatives and goals. These findings show the usefulness of viewing the topic in complexity science terms (emergent behaviour, non‐linearity and chaotic response). Research limitations/implications This research is limited in applying the given technique to a single case study organisation in the UK manufacturing sector, where the sample size is limited. Since this is the first time that such a combined MA‐FCM technique has been used in this field known to the authors, future research needs to validate and explore the implications of this approach in a wider context (multiple organisations and viewpoints). Practical implications The paper highlights the need for those involved in analysing managerial decision making to include aspects of complexity theory in their evaluations – namely uncovering inherent inter‐relationships that may exist between stakeholders, processes and systems. In doing so, expanding the manager's understanding of how to achieve congruence between driving forces and factors, which may exhibit non‐linear, chaotic or feedback behaviour. Originality/value The given research brings together both artificial intelligence and operational research techniques, applied in the socio‐technical milieu of information systems evaluation, within the context of complexity theory, in order to describe the rich detail within the ISE decision‐making task." @default.
• W2107612271 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2107612271 creator A5030777326 @default.
• W2107612271 creator A5061787561 @default.
• W2107612271 date "2006-08-01" @default.
• W2107612271 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2107612271 title "Applying a fuzzy‐morphological approach to complexity within management decision making" @default.
• W2107612271 cites W1508855501 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W1554694181 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W1564942306 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W1968552027 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W1975598632 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W1983280806 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W2001552301 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W2014214168 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W2016113211 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W2018058131 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W2018800079 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W2028673123 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W2058749784 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W2073845692 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W2076610482 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W2156543297 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W2790434863 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W4211007335 @default.
• W2107612271 cites W4236428370 @default.
• W2107612271 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610680604" @default.
• W2107612271 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2107612271 type Work @default.
• W2107612271 sameAs 2107612271 @default.
• W2107612271 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2107612271 countsByYear W21076122712012 @default.
• W2107612271 countsByYear W21076122712014 @default.
• W2107612271 countsByYear W21076122712015 @default.
• W2107612271 countsByYear W21076122712016 @default.
• W2107612271 countsByYear W21076122712017 @default.
• W2107612271 countsByYear W21076122712018 @default.
• W2107612271 countsByYear W21076122712021 @default.
• W2107612271 countsByYear W21076122712022 @default.
• W2107612271 countsByYear W21076122712023 @default.
• W2107612271 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2107612271 hasAuthorship W2107612271A5030777326 @default.
• W2107612271 hasAuthorship W2107612271A5061787561 @default.
• W2107612271 hasBestOaLocation W21076122712 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C13736549 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C1883856 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C42011625 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C5041914 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C57936825 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C58166 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C127413603 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C13736549 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C154945302 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C162324750 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C187736073 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C1883856 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C201995342 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C202444582 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C2522767166 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C2780451532 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C33923547 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C41008148 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C42011625 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C42475967 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C5041914 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C539667460 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C57936825 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C58166 @default.
• W2107612271 hasConceptScore W2107612271C9652623 @default.
• W2107612271 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2107612271 hasLocation W21076122711 @default.
• W2107612271 hasLocation W21076122712 @default.
• W2107612271 hasLocation W21076122713 @default.
• W2107612271 hasOpenAccess W2107612271 @default.
• W2107612271 hasPrimaryLocation W21076122711 @default.
• W2107612271 hasRelatedWork W1975773326 @default.
• W2107612271 hasRelatedWork W1977383971 @default.
• W2107612271 hasRelatedWork W1998172393 @default.
• W2107612271 hasRelatedWork W2081647779 @default.
• W2107612271 hasRelatedWork W2102373941 @default.
• W2107612271 hasRelatedWork W2107612271 @default.
• W2107612271 hasRelatedWork W2362882617 @default.
• W2107612271 hasRelatedWork W2546162184 @default.
• W2107612271 hasRelatedWork W2567152721 @default.
• W2107612271 hasRelatedWork W4237750775 @default.

• next