FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2107906105> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2107906105 endingPage "402" @default.
• W2107906105 startingPage "400" @default.
• W2107906105 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyOpposing Views1 Feb 2015Radical Cystectomy: Open vs Robotic Approach Clayton Stephen Lau, Robert H. Blackwell, and Marcus L. Quek Clayton Stephen LauClayton Stephen Lau More articles by this author , Robert H. BlackwellRobert H. Blackwell More articles by this author , and Marcus L. QuekMarcus L. Quek More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.11.079AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail References 1 : Propensity-matched comparison of morbidity and costs of open and robotic assisted radical cystectomies: a contemporary population based analysis in the United States. Eur Urol2014; 66: 569. Google Scholar 2 : A randomized trial of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. N Engl J Med2014; 371: 389. Google Scholar 3 : Lymphadenectomy at the time of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. BJU Int2011; 107: 642. Google Scholar 4 : Quality of lympadenectomy is equivalent in robotic and open cystectomy using the same template. J Urol2012; 187: 1200. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Complications after robotic assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol2013; 64: 52. Google Scholar 6 : Defining morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol2009; 5: 164. Google Scholar 7 : Early and late complications of robotic assisted cystectomy: a standardized analysis by urinary diversion type. J Urol2014; 191: 681. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Intermediate-term oncologic outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer. J Endourol2014; 28: 939. Google Scholar 9 : The RAZOR trial — randomized open versus robotic cystectomy — study design and trial update. BJU Int2014; . Epub ahead of print. Google Scholar 10 : Assessing the minimum number of lymph nodes needed at radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. BJU Int2009; 103: 1359. Google Scholar 11 : Impact of surgeon and volume on extended lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium (IRCC). BJU Int2013; 111: 1075. Google Scholar 12 : Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol2010; 57: 196. Google Scholar 13 : Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy. J Urol2013; 189: 474. Link, Google Scholar 14 : Lymphadenectomy with robotic cystectomy. Curr Urol Rep2013; 14: 59. Google Scholar 15 : Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival. J Urol2007; 178: 2308. Link, Google Scholar 16 : A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur Urol2010; 57: 274. Google Scholar 17 : Surgical margin status after robot assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol2010; 184: 87. Link, Google Scholar 18 : Matched comparison of robotic-assisted and open radical cystectomy. Urology2012; 79: 1303. Google Scholar © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 193Issue 2February 2015Page: 400-402 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Clayton Stephen Lau More articles by this author Robert H. Blackwell More articles by this author Marcus L. Quek More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2107906105 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2107906105 creator A5028570159 @default.
• W2107906105 creator A5048390692 @default.
• W2107906105 creator A5052021735 @default.
• W2107906105 date "2015-02-01" @default.
• W2107906105 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2107906105 title "Radical Cystectomy: Open vs Robotic Approach" @default.
• W2107906105 cites W1715541821 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W1966938827 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W2002209526 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W2004596895 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W2008523684 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W2019812794 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W2052354141 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W2079951494 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W2084015754 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W2085121132 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W2099606826 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W2118229810 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W2129608226 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W2139963921 @default.
• W2107906105 cites W2153606726 @default.
• W2107906105 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.11.079" @default.
• W2107906105 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25447101" @default.
• W2107906105 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2107906105 type Work @default.
• W2107906105 sameAs 2107906105 @default.
• W2107906105 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2107906105 countsByYear W21079061052016 @default.
• W2107906105 countsByYear W21079061052017 @default.
• W2107906105 countsByYear W21079061052020 @default.
• W2107906105 countsByYear W21079061052023 @default.
• W2107906105 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2107906105 hasAuthorship W2107906105A5028570159 @default.
• W2107906105 hasAuthorship W2107906105A5048390692 @default.
• W2107906105 hasAuthorship W2107906105A5052021735 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConcept C103203806 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConcept C2775910329 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConcept C2777284795 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConcept C2780352672 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConcept C2780824555 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConcept C3020745361 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConceptScore W2107906105C103203806 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConceptScore W2107906105C121608353 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConceptScore W2107906105C126322002 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConceptScore W2107906105C126894567 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConceptScore W2107906105C141071460 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConceptScore W2107906105C2775910329 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConceptScore W2107906105C2777284795 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConceptScore W2107906105C2780352672 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConceptScore W2107906105C2780824555 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConceptScore W2107906105C3020745361 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConceptScore W2107906105C61434518 @default.
• W2107906105 hasConceptScore W2107906105C71924100 @default.
• W2107906105 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2107906105 hasLocation W21079061051 @default.
• W2107906105 hasLocation W21079061052 @default.
• W2107906105 hasOpenAccess W2107906105 @default.
• W2107906105 hasPrimaryLocation W21079061051 @default.
• W2107906105 hasRelatedWork W1895441594 @default.
• W2107906105 hasRelatedWork W1964524236 @default.
• W2107906105 hasRelatedWork W2066626651 @default.
• W2107906105 hasRelatedWork W2072045535 @default.
• W2107906105 hasRelatedWork W2079030324 @default.
• W2107906105 hasRelatedWork W2162855063 @default.
• W2107906105 hasRelatedWork W2165762581 @default.
• W2107906105 hasRelatedWork W2604879616 @default.
• W2107906105 hasRelatedWork W3023279098 @default.
• W2107906105 hasRelatedWork W4296252756 @default.
• W2107906105 hasVolume "193" @default.
• W2107906105 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2107906105 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2107906105 magId "2107906105" @default.
• W2107906105 workType "article" @default.