FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2107979215> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2107979215 endingPage "289" @default.
• W2107979215 startingPage "280" @default.
• W2107979215 abstract "Purpose The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of arthroscopic suture bridge repairs of massive rotator cuff tears. Methods Thirty-six patients with massive rotator cuff tears that had been repaired by arthroscopic suture bridge repair were enrolled in this study. The mean follow-up period after surgery was 37.6 ± 8.9 months (range, 25 to 56). Arthroscopic en masse suture bridge repair was used in delaminated tears. The integrity of the repaired rotator cuff was examined by ultrasonography 4.5 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, Constant score, range of motion, and muscle power. Results Twenty-seven cases (75%) showed complete healing on serial ultrasonography, whereas recurrent tears were detected in the remaining 9 cases (25%). Five retears were smaller than, and the other 4 were the same as or larger than, the initial tear. Overall mean functional scores and values improved after surgery. Although the 4 larger retears had a poorer outcome with respect to ASES score than the healed group (P = .005), the Constant score for these 4 retears did not significantly differ at the last follow-up (P = .175). Mean ASES and Constant scores for the larger tear group were also relatively satisfactory (64.2 and 63.0, respectively). Fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus on preoperative magnetic resonance images was associated with a high retear rate (P = .003, odds ratio = 13.664). Conclusions Massive rotator cuff tears can be treated successfully by arthroscopic en masse suture bridge repair with satisfactory results. Larger retears had some adverse effects on functional outcome, whereas patients with smaller retears did not significantly differ in functional outcome from the healed group. Fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus on preoperative magnetic resonance images is a poor prognostic indicator. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of arthroscopic suture bridge repairs of massive rotator cuff tears. Thirty-six patients with massive rotator cuff tears that had been repaired by arthroscopic suture bridge repair were enrolled in this study. The mean follow-up period after surgery was 37.6 ± 8.9 months (range, 25 to 56). Arthroscopic en masse suture bridge repair was used in delaminated tears. The integrity of the repaired rotator cuff was examined by ultrasonography 4.5 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, Constant score, range of motion, and muscle power. Twenty-seven cases (75%) showed complete healing on serial ultrasonography, whereas recurrent tears were detected in the remaining 9 cases (25%). Five retears were smaller than, and the other 4 were the same as or larger than, the initial tear. Overall mean functional scores and values improved after surgery. Although the 4 larger retears had a poorer outcome with respect to ASES score than the healed group (P = .005), the Constant score for these 4 retears did not significantly differ at the last follow-up (P = .175). Mean ASES and Constant scores for the larger tear group were also relatively satisfactory (64.2 and 63.0, respectively). Fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus on preoperative magnetic resonance images was associated with a high retear rate (P = .003, odds ratio = 13.664). Massive rotator cuff tears can be treated successfully by arthroscopic en masse suture bridge repair with satisfactory results. Larger retears had some adverse effects on functional outcome, whereas patients with smaller retears did not significantly differ in functional outcome from the healed group. Fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus on preoperative magnetic resonance images is a poor prognostic indicator." @default.
• W2107979215 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2107979215 creator A5008029860 @default.
• W2107979215 creator A5011311394 @default.
• W2107979215 creator A5015490041 @default.
• W2107979215 creator A5068799024 @default.
• W2107979215 creator A5072504962 @default.
• W2107979215 date "2013-02-01" @default.
• W2107979215 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2107979215 title "Clinical and Ultrasonographic Outcomes of Arthroscopic Suture Bridge Repair for Massive Rotator Cuff Tear" @default.
• W2107979215 cites W183527674 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W1946386259 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W1964332256 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W1967663865 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W1991967079 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W1993515038 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2002229245 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2005814357 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2008384745 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2013302486 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2026817838 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2036267244 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2043037985 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2043598790 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2049190888 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2052848582 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2064301576 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2073045552 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2074694852 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2085325954 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2089321459 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2092622940 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2098226047 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2106597940 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2113816776 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2114093124 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2116240576 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2119373222 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2128472200 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2154541870 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2164539373 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2170163373 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W2179559369 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W4247798302 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W4252347689 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W4253502356 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W4255097449 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W4320300814 @default.
• W2107979215 cites W4378763086 @default.
• W2107979215 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.09.008" @default.
• W2107979215 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23369479" @default.
• W2107979215 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2107979215 type Work @default.
• W2107979215 sameAs 2107979215 @default.
• W2107979215 citedByCount "117" @default.
• W2107979215 countsByYear W21079792152013 @default.
• W2107979215 countsByYear W21079792152014 @default.
• W2107979215 countsByYear W21079792152015 @default.
• W2107979215 countsByYear W21079792152016 @default.
• W2107979215 countsByYear W21079792152017 @default.
• W2107979215 countsByYear W21079792152018 @default.
• W2107979215 countsByYear W21079792152019 @default.
• W2107979215 countsByYear W21079792152020 @default.
• W2107979215 countsByYear W21079792152021 @default.
• W2107979215 countsByYear W21079792152022 @default.
• W2107979215 countsByYear W21079792152023 @default.
• W2107979215 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2107979215 hasAuthorship W2107979215A5008029860 @default.
• W2107979215 hasAuthorship W2107979215A5011311394 @default.
• W2107979215 hasAuthorship W2107979215A5015490041 @default.
• W2107979215 hasAuthorship W2107979215A5068799024 @default.
• W2107979215 hasAuthorship W2107979215A5072504962 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConcept C2776030733 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConcept C2778275304 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConceptScore W2107979215C126838900 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConceptScore W2107979215C141071460 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConceptScore W2107979215C143409427 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConceptScore W2107979215C2776030733 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConceptScore W2107979215C2776511800 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConceptScore W2107979215C2777327002 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConceptScore W2107979215C2778275304 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConceptScore W2107979215C2779162959 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConceptScore W2107979215C2781184374 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConceptScore W2107979215C60465272 @default.
• W2107979215 hasConceptScore W2107979215C71924100 @default.
• W2107979215 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2107979215 hasLocation W21079792151 @default.
• W2107979215 hasLocation W21079792152 @default.
• W2107979215 hasOpenAccess W2107979215 @default.

• next