FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2108011017> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2108011017 endingPage "563" @default.
• W2108011017 startingPage "561" @default.
• W2108011017 abstract "Journal of Comparative Effectiveness ResearchVol. 3, No. 6 OpinionWhat does US$1.1 billion buy? An investment in the futureLisa A SimpsonLisa A SimpsonE-mail Address: Lisa.Simpson@academyhealth.orgAcademyHealth, 1150 17th Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036, USASearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:12 Dec 2014https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.14.74AboutSectionsView ArticleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail View articleKeywords: academicCERfundingimpactincentivespolicyresearch infrastructureworkforceReferences1 National Academies of Science. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA (2007).Google Scholar2 Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA (2007). www.nap.edu/catalog/11463.html Google Scholar3 ResearchAmerica. America Speaks: poll data summary, Volume 10 (2009). www.researchamerica.org/uploads/AmericaSpeaksV10.pdfGoogle Scholar4 Wilensky GR. The policies and politics of creating a comparative clinical effectiveness research center. Health Aff. 28(4), w719–w729 (2009).Crossref, Google Scholar5 Orszag P. Time to act on health care costs. Issues in Science and Technology. 27 November 2013. http://issues.org/24–23/orszagGoogle Scholar6 Institute of Medicine. Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA (2009).Google Scholar7 Conway PH, Clancy C. Comparative-effectiveness research – implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's report. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 328–330 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar8 Esposito D, Yong P, Rich E, Geonnotti K, Kimmey L. The ARRA investment in CER: a description of the midstream evaluation and how the funds were allocated and CER priorities addressed. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 3(6), 581–589 (2014).Link, Google Scholar9 Forrest C, Simpson L, Clancy C. Child health services research: challenges and opportunities. JAMA 277(22), 1787–1793 (1997).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar10 Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. Oxford University Press, UK (2012).Crossref, Google Scholar11 A National Research Agenda for Public Health Services and Systems. Am. J. Prev. Med. 42(5S1), S72–S78 (2012). www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/articles/journal_articles/2012/rwjf72691Medline, Google Scholar12 Halfon N, Schuster M, Valentine W, McGlynn E. Improving the quality of healthcare for children: implementing the results of the AHSR research agenda conference. Health Serv. Res. 33(4 Pt 2), 955–976 (1998).Medline, CAS, Google Scholar13 Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Baumann AA et al. The implementation research institute: training mental health implementation researchers in the United States. Implement. Sci. 8, 105 (2013).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Hanson TA. Scientific communities of practice for learning – lessons from ethnographic fieldwork. www.academia.edu/1429397/Scientific_communities_of_practice_for_learning_-_lessons_from_ethnographic_fieldworkGoogle Scholar15 Holve E, Segal C, Rein A, Hamilton Lopez M, Johnson B. The Electronic Data Methods (EDM) Forum for comparative effectiveness research (CER). Med. Care 50, S7–S10 (2012).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16 Wilcox A, Randhawa G, Embi P, Cao H, Kuperman G. Sustainability Considerations for Health Research and Analytic Data Infrastructures. eGEMs 2(2), doi:10.13063/2327-9214.1113 (2014).Crossref, Google Scholar17 The International School on Research Impact Assessment. www.theinternationalschoolonria.comGoogle Scholar18 Guthrie S, Wamae W, Diepeveen S, Wooding S, Grant J. Measuring Research: A Guide to Research Evaluation Frameworks and Tools. Prepared for the Association of American Medical Colleges. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/MG1200/MG1217/RAND_MG1217.sum.pdf Google Scholar19 American Society for Cell Biology. The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. http://am.ascb.org/dora Google Scholar20 Bladek M. DORA: San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. C & R L News April: 191–196. http://crln.acrl.org/content/75/4/191.full.pdf+htmlGoogle Scholar21 Priem J. Scholarship: Beyond the paper. Nature 495(7442), 437–440 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar22 AcademyHealth. AHRQ: 15 Years of transforming care and improving health (2014). www.academyhealth.org/files/AHRQReport2014.pdfGoogle Scholar23 Research Excellence Framework. Decisions on assessing research impact (2011). www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/pub/decisionsonassessingresearchimpact/01_11.pdfGoogle Scholar24 Alivisatos P, Isaacs ED, Mason T. The sequester is going to devastate U.S. science research for decades. The Atlantic, March 2013. www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/03/the-sequester-is-going-to-devastate-us-science-research-for-decades/273925 Google Scholar25 Stein S. The next frontier in the war over science. Huffington Post, 6 May 2014. www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/06/war-on-science_n_5269527.htmlGoogle Scholar26 Inside Health Policy. House republicans say increased NIH, FDA funding off table for medical innovation bill. 10 September 2014. http://insidehealthpolicy.com/house-republicans-nih-fda-funding-bump-table-innovation-billGoogle ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByA Half-Century of Change22 May 2017 | Health Services Research, Vol. 52, No. 3 Vol. 3, No. 6 Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics Downloaded 50 times History Published online 12 December 2014 Published in print November 2014 Information© Future Medicine LtdKeywordsacademicCERfundingimpactincentivespolicyresearch infrastructureworkforceFinancial & competing interests disclosureAcademyHealth received support from the ARRA funds, but these projects have since either ended or are now funded through other federal and non-federal sources. The author has no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.PDF download" @default.
• W2108011017 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2108011017 creator A5005008868 @default.
• W2108011017 date "2014-11-01" @default.
• W2108011017 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W2108011017 title "What does US$1.1 billion buy? An investment in the future" @default.
• W2108011017 cites W1594902910 @default.
• W2108011017 cites W2007767904 @default.
• W2108011017 cites W2056410133 @default.
• W2108011017 cites W2059275568 @default.
• W2108011017 cites W2094375923 @default.
• W2108011017 cites W2098135180 @default.
• W2108011017 cites W2131412947 @default.
• W2108011017 cites W2132800868 @default.
• W2108011017 cites W2139873806 @default.
• W2108011017 cites W2339528355 @default.
• W2108011017 cites W2554549458 @default.
• W2108011017 doi "https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.14.74" @default.
• W2108011017 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25494559" @default.
• W2108011017 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2108011017 type Work @default.
• W2108011017 sameAs 2108011017 @default.
• W2108011017 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2108011017 countsByYear W21080110172017 @default.
• W2108011017 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2108011017 hasAuthorship W2108011017A5005008868 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConcept C27548731 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConceptScore W2108011017C161191863 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConceptScore W2108011017C17744445 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConceptScore W2108011017C199539241 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConceptScore W2108011017C27548731 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConceptScore W2108011017C41008148 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConceptScore W2108011017C71924100 @default.
• W2108011017 hasConceptScore W2108011017C94625758 @default.
• W2108011017 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2108011017 hasLocation W21080110171 @default.
• W2108011017 hasLocation W21080110172 @default.
• W2108011017 hasOpenAccess W2108011017 @default.
• W2108011017 hasPrimaryLocation W21080110171 @default.
• W2108011017 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W2108011017 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W2108011017 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
• W2108011017 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W2108011017 hasRelatedWork W2322233747 @default.
• W2108011017 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2108011017 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2108011017 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W2108011017 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W2108011017 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W2108011017 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2108011017 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2108011017 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2108011017 magId "2108011017" @default.
• W2108011017 workType "article" @default.