FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2108142764> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2108142764 endingPage "938" @default.
• W2108142764 startingPage "934" @default.
• W2108142764 abstract "Objective: The physical examination of peripheral perfusion based on touching the skin or measuring capillary refill time has been related to the prognosis of patients with circulatory shock. It is unclear, however, whether monitoring peripheral perfusion after initial resuscitation still provides information on morbidity in critically ill patients. Therefore, we investigated whether subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion could help identify critically ill patients with a more severe organ or metabolic dysfunction using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and lactate levels. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Multidisciplinary intensive care unit in a university hospital. Patients: Fifty consecutive adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Patients were considered to have abnormal peripheral perfusion if the examined extremity had an increase in capillary refill time (>4.5 seconds) or it was cool to the examiner hands. To address reliability of subjective inspection and palpation of peripheral perfusion, we also measured forearm-to-fingertip skin-temperature gradient (Tskin-diff), central-to-toe temperature difference (Tc-toe), and peripheral flow index. The measurements were taken within 24 hours of admission to the intensive care after hemodynamic stability was obtained (mean arterial pressure >65 mm Hg). Changes in SOFA score during the first 48 hours were analyzed (δ-SOFA). Individual SOFA score was significantly higher in patients with abnormal peripheral perfusion than in those with normal peripheral perfusion (9 ± 3 vs. 7 ± 2, p < 0.05). Tskin-diff, Tc-toe, and peripheral flow index were congruent with the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion. The proportion of patients with δ-SOFA score >0 was significantly higher in patients with abnormal peripheral perfusion (77% vs. 23%, p < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of unfavorable evolution are 7.4 (95% confidence interval 2–19; p < 0.05) times higher for a patient with abnormal peripheral perfusion. The proportion of hyperlactatemia was significantly different between patients with abnormal and normal peripheral perfusion (67% vs. 33%, p < 0.05). The odds of hyperlactatemia by logistic regression analysis are 4.6 (95% confidence interval 1.4–15; p < 0.05) times higher for a patient with abnormal peripheral perfusion. Conclusions: Subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion with physical examination following initial hemodynamic resuscitation in the first 24 hours of admission could identify hemodynamically stable patients with a more severe organ dysfunction and higher lactate levels. Patients with abnormal peripheral perfusion had significantly higher odds of worsening organ failure than did patients with normal peripheral perfusion following initial resuscitation." @default.
• W2108142764 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2108142764 creator A5012141677 @default.
• W2108142764 creator A5019348361 @default.
• W2108142764 creator A5040727843 @default.
• W2108142764 creator A5057342507 @default.
• W2108142764 creator A5066477811 @default.
• W2108142764 date "2009-03-01" @default.
• W2108142764 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2108142764 title "The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients" @default.
• W2108142764 cites W1854895771 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W1968198621 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W1973976410 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W1974873560 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W1977261421 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W1978874230 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W1986083983 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2007170353 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2012397223 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2013429977 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2013845970 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2029493246 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2032936502 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2044999792 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2047660660 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2052035429 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2078546046 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2080347627 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2084266120 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2092277070 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2107728559 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2123656964 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2129681898 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2131985493 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2135662590 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2149592972 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2153723930 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W2161631123 @default.
• W2108142764 cites W4250421444 @default.
• W2108142764 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819869db" @default.
• W2108142764 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19237899" @default.
• W2108142764 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2108142764 type Work @default.
• W2108142764 sameAs 2108142764 @default.
• W2108142764 citedByCount "221" @default.
• W2108142764 countsByYear W21081427642012 @default.
• W2108142764 countsByYear W21081427642013 @default.
• W2108142764 countsByYear W21081427642014 @default.
• W2108142764 countsByYear W21081427642015 @default.
• W2108142764 countsByYear W21081427642016 @default.
• W2108142764 countsByYear W21081427642017 @default.
• W2108142764 countsByYear W21081427642018 @default.
• W2108142764 countsByYear W21081427642019 @default.
• W2108142764 countsByYear W21081427642020 @default.
• W2108142764 countsByYear W21081427642021 @default.
• W2108142764 countsByYear W21081427642022 @default.
• W2108142764 countsByYear W21081427642023 @default.
• W2108142764 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2108142764 hasAuthorship W2108142764A5012141677 @default.
• W2108142764 hasAuthorship W2108142764A5019348361 @default.
• W2108142764 hasAuthorship W2108142764A5040727843 @default.
• W2108142764 hasAuthorship W2108142764A5057342507 @default.
• W2108142764 hasAuthorship W2108142764A5066477811 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConcept C146957229 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConcept C2776376669 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConcept C2777465075 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConcept C2778165595 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConcept C2909332496 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConcept C2987404301 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConcept C46762472 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConceptScore W2108142764C126322002 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConceptScore W2108142764C141071460 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConceptScore W2108142764C146957229 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConceptScore W2108142764C164705383 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConceptScore W2108142764C177713679 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConceptScore W2108142764C2776376669 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConceptScore W2108142764C2777465075 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConceptScore W2108142764C2778165595 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConceptScore W2108142764C2909332496 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConceptScore W2108142764C2987404301 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConceptScore W2108142764C46762472 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConceptScore W2108142764C71924100 @default.
• W2108142764 hasConceptScore W2108142764C84393581 @default.
• W2108142764 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2108142764 hasLocation W21081427641 @default.
• W2108142764 hasLocation W21081427642 @default.
• W2108142764 hasOpenAccess W2108142764 @default.
• W2108142764 hasPrimaryLocation W21081427641 @default.
• W2108142764 hasRelatedWork W2090241620 @default.
• W2108142764 hasRelatedWork W2108142764 @default.
• W2108142764 hasRelatedWork W2133635544 @default.
• W2108142764 hasRelatedWork W2135662590 @default.

• next